CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 20(1)

159 TECHNIQUES FOR OVUM PICK-UP IN GONADOTROPIN-TREATED ALPACAS

G. Gamarra, A. Gallegos, E. Alvarado, M. Asparrin and W. Vivanco

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 20(1) 159 - 160

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the quantity and quality of oocytes collected when using 2 methods for ovum pick-up and 2 different regimens for ovarian stimulation in live alpaca donors. Thirty-four non-pregnant female alpacas of 3 to 5 years of age maintained at 4100 m elevation in southern Peru were randomly distributed into 4 experimental groups. Groups 1 (n = 8) and 3 (n = 9) received an intravaginal device containing 0.78 mg of progesterone (Cue-Mate®, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) plus an i.m. injection of 1 mg of estradiol benzoate on Day 0; the intravaginal device was removed on Day 7. Groups 2 (n = 7) and 4 (n = 10) received an i.m. injection of 3.1 mg of LH (Lutropin®, Bioniche Animal Health) on Day 0. Females received 700 IU of eCG (Pregnecol®, Bioniche Animal Health) i.m. on Day 7 (Groups 1 and 3) or Day 2 (Groups 2 and 4). In all groups, oocyte collection was done 2 days after the injection of eCG. Groups 1 and 2 were subjected to ventral laparotomy aspirating the oocytes from follicles >3 mm in diameter using a 10-mL hypodermic syringe containing 1 mL of aspiration media (Ringer's lactate solution plus 10% bovine serum) and connected to an 18 G × 1 inch aspiration needle. After collection, the follicular fluid was searched and the COC were graded. Groups 3 and 4 were subjected to ovum pick-up by transvaginal recovery using an ultrasound scanner (Parus 240®, Pie Medical, Maastricht, the Netherlands) equipped with a vaginal probe of 7.5 MHz (MEVA®, Pie Medical) and a 17G × 55 cm aspiration needle introduced through a needle guide. Follicles >3 mm in diameter were aspirated into 50-mL centrifuge tubes containing 5 mL of aspiration media with 75 IU mL–1 of heparin. The aspirated fluid was filtered and rinsed using an embryo filter (EmCon®, Immunosystems, Menomonie, WI), and COC were searched and graded under a microscope based on the intactness of the cumulus cell layers. Data were analyzed by ANOVA. There were no differences (P > 0.05) between groups in the mean number of follicles aspirated per donor (11.0, 13.8, 9.4, and 9.1 for Groups 1 to 4 respectively), and in the mean number of COC recovered per donor (7.6, 7.0, 6.0, and 6.1 respectively for Groups 1 to 4). The proportions of good quality COC were significantly (P < 0.01) different between surgical (81.0 and 79.5% for Groups 1 and 2) and transvaginal/ultrasound-guided (7.4% for Group 3) methods of collection; however, they were similar to the proportion in Group 4 (64.9%) retrievals. The results show that in the absence of an intravaginal device, a similar quantity and quality of alpaca oocytes can be collected when using a surgical approach or minimally invasive ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular aspiration.



Full text doi:10.1071/RDv20n1Ab159

© CSIRO 2008

 
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012