CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 20(1)

22 PREGNANCY RATES IN DAIRY COWS TREATED WITH PROGESTERONE-RELEASING DEVICES AND DIFFERENT GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE OR ESTRADIOL PLUS EQUINE CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN FIXED-TIME ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION PROTOCOLS

G. Veneranda, L. Filippi, D. Racca, L. Cutaia and G. A. Bo

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 20(1) 91 - 91

Abstract

We have previously shown that the addition of eCG improved pregnancy rates following fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in lactating dairy cows treated with estradiol benzoate (EB) and progesterone releasing devices (Veneranda et al. 2006 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 18, 118). An experiment was designed to compare pregnancy rates in lactating dairy cows treated with progesterone-releasing devices and EB plus eCG with different gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-based protocols. Five-hundred lactating dairy cows between 30 and 51 days postpartum (when prostaglandin F (PGF) treatments were given in the Pre-Synch groups), with a milk yield of 29.5 ± 7.0 kg per day (range 13.0 to 46.0 kg) and a body condition score (BCS) between 2.5 to 3.5 out of 5 were used. Cows were blocked by days postpartum and randomly assigned to five treatment groups. Cows in the Pre-Synch group received PGF 28 and 14 days prior to the insertion of a DIB device (1 g progesterone, Syntex SA, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and the administration of 50 µg of Lecirelin (GnRH, Ovusin, Syntex SA) IM (Day 0). On Day 7, DIB were removed and cows received PGF (0.5 mg cloprostenol, Ciclase, Syntex SA). On Day 9, cows received a second GnRH treatment and were FTAI 16 h later (60 h after device removal). Cows in the Modified Pre-Synch group were treated similarly except that they received a DIB for 7 days prior to the second PGF injection and no DIB at the time of the first GnRH. Cows in the P4-Synch group were treated as those in the Pre-synch group but did not receive the two doses of PGF 28 and 14 days earlier. Cows in the P4 + EB + eCG groups received a DIB for 8 days, 2 mg of EB at DIB insertion (Day 0), and PGF and 400 IU eCG (Novormon, Syntex SA) IM at DIB removal (Day 8); they were subdivided to receive 1 mg of EB on Day 9 (P4 + EB + eCG + EB group) or GnRH on Day 10 (P4 + EB + eCG + GnRH group). Cows in these latter two groups were also FTAI 60 h after device removal. Pregnancy was determined by rectal palpation 50 days after FTAI and data were analyzed by logistic regression. Pregnancy rates were not affected by BCS, days postpartum, or milk yield (P > 0.5). However, there was a significant group effect due to a higher (P < 0.05) pregnancy rate in the P4 + EB + eCG + EB (49%) and P4 + EB + eCG + GnRH (44%) treatment groups than in those in the Modified Pre-Synch group (30%). Pregnancy rate in the P4-Synch group (39%) was lower (P < 0.05) than those in the P4 + EB + eCG + EB group but not different from the others. Finally, pregnancy rate in Pre-Synch group (41%) was intermediate and not different from the other treatment groups. Results of these experiments suggest that treatments with progesterone-releasing devices, EB, and eCG result in pregnancy rates that are comparable to or better than those obtained in GnRH-based protocols in lactating dairy cows. Further studies are needed to investigate whether eCG could increase pregnancy rates in cows treated with GnRH and progesterone-releasing devices.

The authors thank Syntex SA for providing the hormones used in the study.



Full text doi:10.1071/RDv20n1Ab22

© CSIRO 2008

 
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012