437 DETERMINING GENE COPY NUMBER IN TRANSFECTED CAPRINE FIBROBLAST CELLS

Abstract

Transgene expression in stably transgenic organisms is affected by many factors, including the copy number of the transgene in the genome and by interactions between the transgene and flanking DNA sequences. Very high transgene copy number has also been shown to affect genetic stability in transgenic plants and animals. Two commonly used methods for transfecting cells prior to their use in nuclear transfer (NT) are liposome-mediated transfection and electroporation. Little is known about the transgene copy number or variability of the copy number with these techniques. The objective of this study was to determine transgene copy number after liposome-mediated transfection and electroporation. The mean transgene copy number and variability between individual integration events have been determined. Q-PCR conditions were optimized for primer annealing temperature and concentration when amplifying a region of a plasmid expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the human elongation factor (hEF) promoter (hEFGFP) used for transfection. The quantitative nature of the Q-PCR reaction was confirmed by amplifying 10-fold dilutions of the plasmid and plotting the threshold cycle (CT) value against the log of the plasmid concentration. A correlation coefficient of 1.00 and a calculated PCR efficiency of 93.3% were obtained from this analysis. Caprine fibroblasts were transfected by electroporation with 20 μg of DNA or FuGENE^® HD (Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA) reagent with 6 μg of DNA using either a circular or linearized hEFGFP plasmid. Transformed cells were plated at low density in medium containing Geneticin^® (Gibco, Grand Island, NY USA). After 10 days of culture, single-cell colonies were isolated and expanded. When cultures reached 1 to 2 million cells, genomic DNA was isolated. Transgene copy number was determined by amplifying genomic DNA from individual clones representing 1 × 10⁵ cells with Q-PCR. Transgene copy number was calculated from a standard curve of the transgene plasmid. The mean transgene copy number for electroporation circular was 2.7 ± 0.75 (n = 32 colonies) and 1.3 ± 0.65 (n = 19) when using a linear DNA construct. FuGENE HD using a circular plasmid construct generated a mean gene copy number of 0.5 ± 0.11 (n = 14) and 0.64 ± 0.13 (n = 16) for the linear plasmid construct. One-way ANOVA followed by multiple pair-wise comparisons using Tukey’s method showed significant differences when comparing electroporation circular to all other treatments. However, there were no differences when comparing electroporation linear, FuGENE HD circular, and FuGENE HD linear to each other. Because the calculated mean copy number for transfection with FuGENE HD was consistently less than 1, it is assumed that these colonies consisted predominantly of single-copy integrations. Our results indicate that the transfection method can affect gene copy number. Electroporation resulted in multiple but few copies whereas Fugene HD resulted in predominantly single-copy integrations. The probability of transgene mutation with single-copy integration suggests that electroporation is preferable forproducing transgenic animals by NT.