CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > The Rangeland Journal   
The Rangeland Journal
  Rangeland Ecology & Management
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Contributors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
Referee Guidelines
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

Now Online

Land Resources Surveys


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 31(3)

Buffel grass in Queensland’s semi-arid woodlands: response to local and landscape scale variables, and relationship with grass, forb and reptile species

Teresa J. Eyre A D, Jian Wang A, Melanie F. Venz A, Chris Chilcott B, Giselle Whish C

A Biodiversity Sciences Unit, Queensland Department of Resource Management, Forestry Building, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia.
B Department of Agricultural and Food, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6058, Australia.
C Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 203 Tor Street, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: teresa.eyre@derm.qld.gov.au
 
PDF (633 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Buffel grass [Pennisetum ciliare (L.) Link] has been widely introduced in the Australian rangelands as a consequence of its value for productive grazing, but tends to competitively establish in non-target areas such as remnant vegetation. In this study, we examined the influence landscape-scale and local-scale variables had upon the distribution of buffel grass in remnant poplar box (Eucalyptus populnea F.Muell.) dominant woodland fragments in the Brigalow Bioregion, Queensland. Buffel grass and variables thought to influence its distribution in the region were measured at 60 sites, which were selected based on the amount of native woodland retained in the landscape and patch size. An information-theoretic modelling approach and hierarchical partitioning revealed that the most influential variable was the percent of retained vegetation within a 1-km spatial extent. From this, we identified a critical threshold of ~30% retained vegetation in the landscape, above which the model predicted buffel grass was not likely to occur in a woodland fragment. Other explanatory variables in the model were site based, and included litter cover and long-term rainfall. Given the paucity of information on the effect of buffel grass upon biodiversity values, we undertook exploratory analyses to determine whether buffel grass cover influenced the distribution of grass, forb and reptile species. We detected some trends; hierarchical partitioning revealed that buffel grass cover was the most important explanatory variable describing habitat preferences of four reptile species. However, establishing causal links – particularly between native grass and forb species and buffel grass – was problematic owing to possible confounding with grazing pressure. We conclude with a set of management recommendations aimed at reducing the spread of buffel grass into remnant woodlands.

Keywords: clearing, fragmentation, grassy woodlands, invasive grass, thresholds.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012