Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A conservation auction for landscape linkage in the southern Desert Uplands, Queensland

Jill Windle A E , John Rolfe B , Juliana McCosker C and Andrea Lingard D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Environmental Management, CQUniversity, Bruce Highway, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.

B Faculty of Business and Informatics, CQUniversity, Bruce Highway, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.

C Queensland Environmental Protection Agency, PO Box 906, Emerald, Qld 4720, Australia.

D Desert Uplands Committee, PO Box 310, Barcaldine, Qld 4725, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: j.windle@cqu.edu.au

The Rangeland Journal 31(1) 127-135 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ08042
Submitted: 9 September 2008  Accepted: 8 December 2008   Published: 26 March 2009

Abstract

Conservation auctions are a type of market-based instrument (MBI) that can achieve a more cost-efficient allocation of public funds than approaches such as devolved grants. In this paper, the conduct of a multiple round conservation auction to improve biodiversity management in a rangelands area is outlined. The auction was designed to develop a wildlife corridor across the southern Desert Uplands bioregion in Queensland and to improve management of rangelands areas.

The conservation auction incorporated two important new design features. First, there was a need to promote landholder cooperation so that proposed areas for better land management were aligned and connected across the region. The second innovative design feature was to hold multiple bidding (three) rounds, which differs from the standard application of a single bidding round.

The auction outcomes resulted in conservation contracts covering 85 000 ha of remnant vegetation awarded at an average cost of $2* per hectare per annum. Although complete landscape connectivity across the Desert Uplands was not achieved, over 70% of the successful bids, accounting for over 62 000 ha (77% of the total bid area), were part of a group that formed a distinct corridor or landscape linkage with only single or part-property gaps. The results also indicate that multiple bidding rounds improved auction efficiency (for the government), although there was little improvement in connectivity. Sixty-six percent more environmental benefit units could be purchased for the given budget of $350 000 between rounds one and three.

Additional keywords: biodiversity, market based-instruments, vegetation corridors.


References


Chouinard H., Paterson T., Wandschneider P., Ohler A. (2008) Will farmers trade profits for stewardship? Heterogeneous motivations for farm practice selection. Land Economics 84, 66–82. open url image1

Faith D. P., Carter G., Cassis G., Ferrier S., Wilkie L. (2003) Complementarity, biodiversity viability analysis, and policy-based algorithms for conservation. Environmental Science & Policy 6, 311–328.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ferraro P. (2004) Targeting conservation investments in heterogeneous landscapes: a distance-function approach and application to watershed management. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86, 905–918.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Fischer J., Lindenmayer D. B. (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16, 265–280.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Greiner R., Lankester A. (2007) Supporting on-farm biodiversity conservation through debt-for-conservation swaps: concept and critique. Land Use Policy 24, 458–471.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hiltry J. A. , Lidicker W. Z. , and Merenlender A. M. (2006). ‘Corridor Ecology – the Science and Practise of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC.)

Klemperer P. (2002) What really matters in auction design? Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, 169–189.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Latacz-Lohmann U., Van der Hamsvoort C. (1997) Auctioning conservation contracts: a theoretical analysis and application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79, 407–418.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Latacz-Lohmann U., Van der Hamsvoort C. (1998) Auctions as a means of creating a market for public goods from agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics 49, 334–345.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

MacLeod N. D., Ash A. J., McIvor J. G. (2004) An economic assessment of the impact of grazing land condition on livestock production in tropical woodlands. The Rangeland Journal 26, 49–71.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Metrick A., Weitzman M. L. (1998) Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preservation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, 21–34. open url image1

National Market Based Instrument Working Group (NMBIWG) (2005). National Market-Based Instrument Pilot Program, Round One Interim Report. National Market Based Instrument Working Group, Canberra.

Oliver I. , and Parkes D. (2003). A prototype for scoring the biodiversity benefits of land use change. Version 5.1. Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources, NSW Government.

Parkes D., Newell G., Cheal D. (2003) Assessing the quality of native vegetation: the ‘habitat hectares’ approach. Ecological Management & Restoration 4, 29–38.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rolfe J. C. (2002) Economics of vegetation clearing in Queensland. The Rangeland Journal 24, 152–169.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rolfe J. C., Blamey R. K., Bennett J. W. (2000) Valuing the preservation of rangelands: tree clearing in the Desert Uplands region of Queensland. The Rangeland Journal 22, 205–219.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rolfe J. , McCosker J. , and Windle J. (2006). Metric design for the Desert Uplands Landscape Linkages auction. Report for the Desert Uplands Committee, August 2006. Queensland Environmental Protection Agency and Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Qld.

Rolfe J., McCosker J., Windle J. (2008) Identifying the incentives that graziers in central-western Queensland need to manage land for conservation outcomes. The Rangeland Journal 30, 297–303.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sinden J. (2004) Do the public gains from vegetation protection in north-western New South Wales exceed the landholders’ loss of land values? The Rangeland Journal 26, 204–224.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Söndgerath D., Schröder B. (2002) Population dynamics and habitat connectivity affecting the spatial spread of populations – a simulation study. Landscape Ecology 17, 57–70.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Trousdale W., Gregory R. (2004) Property evaluation and biodiversity conservation. Decision support for making hard choices. Ecological Economics 48, 279–291.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Whitten S. , Reeson A. , Windle J. , and Rolfe J. (2007). Barriers to and Opportunities for Increasing Participation in Competitive Tenders. Final Report for Land and Water Australia, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Canberra and Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Qld.

Windle J. , and Rolfe J. (2006). Fitzroy Basin Association’s Biodiversity Tender: an Outline and Evaluation. Main Report for the Fitzroy Basin Association, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Qld.

Windle J., Rolfe J. (2008) Exploring the efficiencies of using competitive tenders over fixed price grants to protect biodiversity in Australian rangelands. Land Use Policy 25, 388–398.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Windle J. , Rolfe J. , McCosker J. , and Linguard A. (2007). The Desert Upland Committee’s Landscape Linkage Auction: an Outline and Evaluation. Report for the Desert Upland Committee, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Qld.

Woinarski J. C. Z., Fisher A. (2003) Conservation and the maintenance of biodiversity in the rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 25, 157–171.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wu J., Skelton-Groth K. (2002) Targeting conservation efforts in the presence of threshold effects and ecosystem linkages. Ecological Economics 42, 313–331.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1









*All values are in Australian dollars throughout the paper.

1Full details of how each category was assessed are provided in Rolfe et al. (2006).

2This would include new landowners who may have bought properties that had been run down and were in poor condition.

3A 100-m transect was used to measure ground cover by a point intercept method and five 0.25 × 0.25 m quadrats were cut to dry weigh and establish the pasture biomass.