CSIRO Publishing Home Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Sexual Health
  An interdisciplinary journal of sexual health including HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections
You are here: Journals > Sexual Health   
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Committee
Editorial Contacts
Sites of Interest
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
For Advertisers
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 

Exploring ‘best practice’ for nucleic acid detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

David M. Whiley A B, Suzanne M. Garland C D, Geoffrey Harnett E, Gary Lum F, David W. Smith E, Sepehr N. Tabrizi C D, Theo P. Sloots A B and John W. Tapsall G H

A Queensland Paediatric Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Sir Albert Sakzewski Virus Research Centre, Royal Children’s Hospital and Health Service District, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia.
B Clinical Medical Virology Centre, University of Queensland, Qld 4029, Australia.
C Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Womens’ Hospital, Melbourne, Vic. 3053, Australia.
D Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Vic. 3053, Australia.
E Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, PathWest Laboratory Medicine Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.
F Microbiology Laboratory, Pathology Department, Royal Darwin Hospital, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia.
G WHO Collaborating Centre for STD and HIV, Microbiology Department, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
H Corresponding author. Email: j.tapsall@unsw.edu.au


Abstract

Nucleic acid detection tests (NADT) have considerable benefits for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC), including high sensitivity across a range of specimen types and use under widely differing settings and conditions. However, sexual health practitioners and others who use data generated by NADT for GC should be aware of some important limitations of these tests. False-positive results caused by cross reaction with commensal Neisseria species have been observed in many assays, and have lead to unacceptably low positive-predictive values in some patient populations. Further, false-negative results can be caused by GC sequence variation, with some gonococci lacking certain NADT target sequences. This review examines the issues associated with gonococcal NADT and considers best practice for use of these assays based on current knowledge. We emphasise the need for supplementary testing and extensive assay validation, and suggest appropriate strategies for these requirements irrespective of the setting in which they are used. Further, we highlight the need to maintain culture-based testing for certain specimen sites as well as for antimicrobial resistance surveillance.

Sexual Health 5(1) 17–23    doi:10.1071/SH07050
Submitted: 6 July 2007    Accepted: 12 December 2007    Published: 22 February 2008





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (127 KB) $25
Export Citation
Cited by
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010