Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty in patients with vaginal agenesis: sexual and psychosocial outcomes

Article

<< Previous

Next >>

Contents Vol 8(3)

doi:10.1071/SH10105

Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective

	Search




	Advanced Search



	Journal Home

	About the Journal

	Editorial Committee

	Contacts



	Content

	Online Early

	Current Issue

	Just Accepted

	All Issues

	Online Early

	Special Issues

	Sample Issue



	For Authors

	General Information

	Instructions to Authors

	Submit Article

	Open Access



	For Referees

	Referee Guidelines

	Review Article

	Annual Referee Index



	For Advertisers



	For Subscribers

	Subscription Prices

	Customer Service

	Print Publication Dates

e-Alerts

Subscribe to our Email Alert or

feeds for the latest journal papers.

Connect with us

Interview with Kit Fairley

Hear Kit Fairley speak about what is sexual health.

Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty in patients with vaginal agenesis: sexual and psychosocial outcomes

Ljiljana D. Labus ^A , Miroslav L. Djordjevic ^A ^B , Dusan S. Stanojevic ^A , Marta R. Bizic ^A , Borko Z. Stojanovic ^A and Tamara M. Cavic ^A

^A School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
^B Corresponding author. Email: djordjevic@uromiros.com

Sexual Health 8(3) 427-430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH10105
Submitted: 30 August 2010 Accepted: 10 February 2011 Published: 17 August 2011





	PDF (93 KB) $25



	Export Citation

Print

Abstract

Background: The main goal in women with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome (vaginal agenesis) is creation of a neovagina that will satisfy the patient’s desire. We evaluated sexual and psychosocial adjustment in patients who underwent rectosigmoid vaginoplasty because of vaginal agenesis. Methods: A total of 36 women, aged 21 to 38 years (mean = 26) who underwent rectosigmoid vaginoplasty from 1997 to 2006 were evaluated. Sexual and psychosocial appraisal included the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI), and standardised questionnaires about postoperative satisfaction, social and sexual adjustment. Results: Mean FSFI score was 28.9 (range = 11.5–35.7) with a cut-off score of 26.55 for sexual dysfunction. Out of the 36 women, 10 (27, 8%) had sexual dysfunction. Mean BDI score was 7.55 (cut-off score = 0–9 for non-depression). Twenty-eight women (77.8%) were without symptoms of depression, six women (BDI range = 10–29) had moderate and two women had severe depression (BDI = 42). There were a significant number of patients (P < 0.01) with a high satisfaction score in FSFI and low BDI results. Thirty-two (88.9%) of the patients believed that surgery was done at the right time and the main postoperative support came from their family. Thirty-four (94.4%) of the patients reported satisfactory femininity, with a heterosexual orientation. Thirty patients (83. 3%) were very satisfied with the surgery, while 34 considered surgery as the best treatment. Conclusions: The sexual function and psychosocial status of these patients should be followed long-term to estimate their quality of life.

Additional keywords: depression, Rokitansky syndrome, sexual function.

References

[1] Ludwig KS. The Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster syndrome. An analysis of its morphology and embryology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1998; 262: 27–42.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[2] Creatsas G, Deligeoroglou E, Makrakis E, Kontoravdis A, Papadimitriou L. Creation of a neovagina following Williams vaginoplasty and the Creatsas modification in 111 patients with Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril 2001; 76: 1036–40.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[3] Frank RT. The formation of an artificial vagina without operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1938; 35: 1054–5.

[4] McIndoe AH, Banister JB. An operation for the cure of congenital absence of the vagina. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1938; 45: 490–4.
| CrossRef |

[5] Vecchietti G. Neovagina nella syndrome di Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser. Ann Ostet Ginecol 1965; 11: 131–47.
| CAS |

[6] Tobin GR, Day TG. Vaginal and pelvic reconstruction with distally based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81: 62–70.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[7] Baldwin J. The formation of an artificial vagina by intestinal transplantation. Ann Surg 1904; 40: 398–403.
| CAS |

[8] Hensle TV, Reiley EA. Vaginal replacement in children and young adults. J Urol 1998; 159: 1035–8.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[9] Perovic S, Stanojevic D, Djordjevic M, Djakovic N. Refinements in rectosigmoid vaginoplasty. Eur Urol 1998; 33: 156–7.

[10] Laufer MR. Congenital absence of the vagina: in search of the perfect solution. When, and by what technique, should a vagina be created? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14: 441–4.
| CrossRef |

[11] Khen-Dunlop N, Lortat-Jacob S, Thibaud E, Clement-Ziza M, Lyonnet S, Nihoul-Fekete C. Rokitansky syndrome: clinical experience and results of sigmoid vaginoplasty in 23 young girls. J Urol 2007; 177: 1107–11.
| CrossRef |

[12] Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191–208.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[13] Richter P, Werner J, Heerlein A, Kraus A, Sauer H. On the validity of the Beck Depression Inventory. A review. Psychopathology 1998; 31: 160–8.
| CrossRef | CAS |

[14] Buss JG, Raymond AL. McIndoe procedure for vaginal agenesis: result and complications. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64: 758–61.
| CAS |

[15] Freundt I, Toon AM, Huikeshoven FJM, Jeekel H, Drogendijk AC. Long-term psychosexual and psychosocial performance of patients with a sigmoid neovagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1210–4.
| CAS |

[16] Borkowski A, Czaplicki M, Dobronski P. Twenty years of experience with Krzeski’s cystovaginoplasty for vaginal agenesis in Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome: anatomical, histological, cytological and functional results. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1433–40.
| CrossRef |

Subscriber Login

	Username: Password:

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help