CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Sexual Health   
Sexual Health
Journal Banner
  Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Committee
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Online Early
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Advertisers
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

red arrow Interview with Kit Fairley
blank image
Hear Kit Fairley speak about what is sexual health.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 9(3)

Risk behaviours by type of concurrency among young people in three STI clinics in the United States

Kristen L. Hess A F, Pamina M. Gorbach A, Lisa E. Manhart B, Bradley P. Stoner C, David H. Martin D and King K. Holmes E

A School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of California Los Angeles, 10880 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
B School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Box 359931, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
C Department of Anthropology, Washington University St. Louis, Campus Box 1114, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
D School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University, 1542 Tulane Avenue, Suite 331, Box T4M-2, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
E School of Public Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Box 359931, 908 Jefferson Street, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
F Corresponding author. Email: khess@ucla.edu

Sexual Health 9(3) 280-287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH11047
Submitted: 15 March 2011  Accepted: 16 September 2011   Published: 9 January 2012


 
PDF (168 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

Background: Concurrent sexual partnerships can increase sexually transmissible infections (STI) transmission on a population level. However, different concurrency types may be associated with differential risks for transmission. To investigate this, we describe the prevalence and correlates of four specific concurrency types. Methods: Between 2001 and 2004, 1098 young adults attending three STI clinics were interviewed and tested for STIs. Characteristics associated with concurrency types were identified using logistic regression. Results: Approximately one-third of respondents reported reactive (34%), transitional (36%), compensatory (32%) and experimental (26%) concurrency. Among men, reactive concurrency was associated with not identifying as heterosexual, drug use and having sex the same day as meeting a partner. Among women, reactive concurrency was associated with African-American race and having >3 lifetime partners. Transitional concurrency was associated with >3 lifetime partners for men and women. Among men, compensatory concurrency was associated with African-American race; among women, there were no associations with compensatory concurrency. Among men, experimental concurrency was associated with >3 lifetime partners and having sex the same day as meeting a partner. Among women, experimental concurrency was associated with not identifying as heterosexual, drug use and having sex the same day as meeting a partner. Conclusions: All concurrency types were common in this population and each was associated with a set of demographic and risk factors. Reactive and experimental concurrency types were associated with other high-risk behaviours, such as drug use.

Additional keywords: drug use, multiple partners, sexual behaviour.


References

[1]  Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS 1997; 11: 641–8.
CrossRef | CAS |

[2]  Potterat JJ, Zimmerman-Rogers H, Muth SQ, Rothenberg RB, Green DL, Taylor JE, et al Chlamydia transmission: concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150: 1331–9.
| CAS |

[3]  Ghani A, Swinton J, Garnett G. The role of sexual partnership networks in the epidemiology of gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis 1997; 24: 45–56.
CrossRef | CAS |

[4]  Koumans EH, Farley TA, Gibson JJ, Langley C, Ross MW, McFarlane M, et al Characteristics of persons with syphilis in areas of persisting syphilis in the United States: sustained transmission associated with concurrent partnerships. Sex Transm Dis 2001; 28: 497–503.
CrossRef | CAS |

[5]  Hudson C. AIDS in rural Africa: a paradigm for HIV-1 prevention. Int J STD AIDS 1996; 7: 236–43.
CrossRef | CAS |

[6]  Kretzschmar M, Morris M. Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease. Math Biosci 1996; 133: 165–95.
CrossRef | CAS |

[7]  Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Bonas DM, Martinson FE, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR. Concurrent sexual partnerships among women in the United States. Epidemiology 2002; 13: 320–7.
CrossRef |

[8]  Kraut-Becher JR, Aral SO. Gap length: an important factor in sexually transmitted disease transmission. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30: 221–5.
CrossRef |

[9]  Manhart LE, Aral SO, Holmes KK, Foxman B. Sex partner concurrency: measurement, prevalence, and correlates among urban 18–39-year-olds. Sex Transm Dis 2002; 29: 133–43.
CrossRef |

[10]  Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Doherty IA. Concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the United States. Am J Public Health 2007; 97: 2230–7.
CrossRef |

[11]  Ford K, Sohn W, Lepkowski J. American adolescents: sexual mixing patterns, bridge partners, and concurrency. Sex Transm Dis 2002; 29: 13–9.
CrossRef |

[12]  Rosenberg MD, Gurvey JE, Adler N, Dunlop MB, Ellen JM. Concurrent sex partners and risk for sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents. Sex Transm Dis 1999; 26: 208–12.
CrossRef | CAS |

[13]  Nelson SJ, Manhart LE, Gorbach PM, Martin DH, Stoner BP, Aral SO, et al Measuring sex partner concurrency: It’s what’s missing that counts. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34: 801–7.

[14]  UNAIDS Reference Group on Estimates, Modeling, and Projections: Working group on measuring concurrent sexual partnerships. HIV: consensus indicators are needed for concurrency. Lancet 2010; 375: 621–2.
CrossRef |

[15]  Morris M. Concurrent partnerships and syphilis persistence: new thoughts on an old puzzle. Sex Transm Dis 2001; 28: 504–7.
CrossRef | CAS |

[16]  Drumright LN, Gorbach PM, Holmes KK. Do people really know their sex partners? Concurrency, knowledge of partner behavior, and sexually transmitted infections within partnerships. Sex Transm Dis 2004; 31: 437–42.
CrossRef |

[17]  Morris M, Kurth AE, Hamilton DT, Moody J, Wakefield S. Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: linking science and public health practice. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 1023–31.
CrossRef |

[18]  Sawers L, Stillwaggon E. Concurrent sexual partnerships do not explain the HIV epidemics in Africa: a systematic review of the evidence. J Int AIDS Soc 2010; 13: 34.
CrossRef |

[19]  Goodreau SM. A decade of modelling research yields considerable evidence for the importance of concurrency: a response to Sawers and Stillwaggon. J Int AIDS Soc 2011; 14: 12.
CrossRef |

[20]  Epstein H, Morris M.. Concurrent partnerships and HIV: an inconvenient truth. J Int AIDS Soc 2011; 14: 13.
CrossRef |

[21]  Santhakumaran S, O’Brien K, Bakker R, Ealden T, Shafer LA, Daniel RM, et al Polygyny and symmetric concurrency: comparing long-duration sexually transmitted infection prevalence using simulated sexual networks. Sex Transm Inf 2010; 86: 553–8.

[22]  Reniers G, Watkins S. Polygyny and the spread of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a case of benign concurrency. AIDS 2010; 24: 299–307.
CrossRef |

[23]  Gorbach PM, Stoner BP, Aral SO, Whittington WLH, Holmes KK. “It takes a village”: understanding concurrent sexual partnerships in Seattle, Washington. Sex Transm Dis 2002; 29: 453–62.
CrossRef |

[24]  Morris M, Epstein H, Wawer M.. Timing is everything: international variations in historical sexual partnership concurrency and HIV prevalence. PloS One 2010; 5: e14092.
CrossRef |

[25]  Doherty IA, Schoenbach VJ, Adimora AA. Condom use and duration of concurrent partnerships among men in the United States. Sex Transm Dis 2009; 36: 265–72.
CrossRef |

[26]  Udry J. The national longitudinal study of adolescent health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2003.

[27]  Doherty IA, Minnis A, Auerswald CL, Adimora AA, Padian NS. Concurrent partnerships among adolescents in a Latino community: the Mission District of San Francisco, California. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34: 437–43.

[28]  Wroblewski JK, Manhart LE, Dickey KA, Hudspeth MK, Totten PA. Comparison of transcription-mediated amplification and PCR assay results for various genital specimen types for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 3306–12.
CrossRef | CAS |

[29]  Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson F, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR, Fullilove RE. Concurrent sexual partnerships among African Americans in the rural south. Ann Epidemiol 2004; 14: 155–60.
CrossRef |

[30]  Crawford I, Hammack PL, McKirnan DJ, Ostrow D, Zamboni BD, Robinson B, et al Sexual sensation seeking, reduced concern about HIV and sexual risk behaviour among gay men in primary relationships. AIDS Care 2003; 15: 513–24.
CrossRef | CAS |

[31]  Galea J, Whittington W, Celum C. An ethnographic study of sexual practices and partnering characteristics of MSM with N. gonorrhoeae in Seattle. Paper presented at 13th Meeting of the International Society for Sexually Transmitted Disease Research; 11–14 July 1999; Denver, CO, USA.

[32]  Manhart LE, Aral SO, Holmes KK, Critchlow CW, Hughes JP, Whittington WL, et al Influence of study population on the identification of risk factors for sexually transmitted diseases using a case–control design: the example of gonorrhea. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 160: 393–402.
CrossRef |


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013