Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Case report and evaluation of the frequency of the prozone phenomenon in syphilis serology – an infrequent but important laboratory phenomenon

Jeffrey J. Post A B C E , Candice Khor A B C , Virginia Furner B , Don E. Smith B , L. Ross Whybin D and Peter W. Robertson D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Infectious Diseases, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.

B Albion Street Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Surry Hills, NSW 2010, Australia.

C Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

D Department of Microbiology, Serology Laboratory, South Eastern Area Laboratory Services, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: Jeffrey.Post@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au

Sexual Health 9(5) 488-490 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH11156
Submitted: 9 November 2011  Accepted: 1 May 2012   Published: 10 September 2012

Abstract

Background: Treponema pallidum specific serology generally remains reactive for life. Therefore, the diagnosis of syphilis reinfection relies on clinical assessment and nontreponemal (reagin) serologic testing. The prozone phenomenon can lead to a falsely nonreactive rapid plasma reagin (RPR) assay result. Methods: We report a case of secondary syphilis in a HIV infected patient with a previous history of syphilis infection, where a falsely nonreactive RPR assay was associated with a delayed diagnosis of reinfection and infectious syphilis. The prozone phenomenon was detected in several of the patient’s serum samples collected around this time. We subsequently undertook a prospective evaluation for the prozone phenomenon in 3222 consecutive sera, which were assayed using the RPR assay for clinical purposes over a 10-month period. Results: The overall rate of the prozone phenomenon was 2 out of 3222 samples (0.06%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.02–0.22%) and the rate per reactive sample was 2 out of 397 (0.5%; 95% CI: 0.14–1.81%). Conclusion: Clinicians should request RPR testing at dilutions of sera when syphilis is suspected clinically and the RPR assay is nonreactive.

Additional keywords: false negative reactions, HIV, serology, testing.


References

[1]  Jin F, Prestage GP, Kippax SC, Pell CM, Donovan BJ, Kaldor JM, et al Epidemic syphilis among homosexually active men in Sydney. Med J Aust 2005; 183 179–83.
| 16097913PubMed |

[2]  Botham SJ, Ressler K-A, Bourne C, Ferson MJ. Epidemic infectious syphilis in inner Sydney – strengthening enhanced surveillance. Aust N Z J Public Health 2006; 30 529–33.
Epidemic infectious syphilis in inner Sydney – strengthening enhanced surveillance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17209268PubMed |

[3]  The Kirby Institute. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia annual surveillance report 2011. Sydney: The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales; 2011.

[4]  Larsen SA, Steiner BM, Rudolph AH. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995; 8 1–21.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3hvFyhtg%3D%3D&md5=2b17dfe26e30990f43feb4109ff1fc95CAS | 7704889PubMed |

[5]  Jurado RL, Campbell J, Martin PD. Prozone phenomenon in secondary syphilis. Has its time arrived? Arch Intern Med 1993; 153 2496–8.
Prozone phenomenon in secondary syphilis. Has its time arrived?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FivFenug%3D%3D&md5=34f3937c9a777f453d294a1f68881a6cCAS | 7832818PubMed |

[6]  Spangler AS, Jackson JH, Fiumara NJ, Warthin TA. Syphilis with a negative blood test reaction. JAMA 1964; 189 87–90.
Syphilis with a negative blood test reaction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF2c7gsF2rtw%3D%3D&md5=058e7b01b93e7b0eee4be93aba6ab8f9CAS | 14148055PubMed |

[7]  el-Zaatari MM, Martens MG, Anderson GD. Incidence of the prozone phenomenon in syphilis serology. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84 609–12.
| 1:STN:280:DyaK2cznslSrug%3D%3D&md5=17a74c41d87f530cfb57791923e0feb2CAS | 8090401PubMed |

[8]  Smith G, Holman RP. The prozone phenomenon with syphilis and HIV-1 co-infection. South Med J 2004; 97 379–82.
The prozone phenomenon with syphilis and HIV-1 co-infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15108832PubMed |

[9]  Nnoruka EN, Ezeoke ACJ. Evaluation of syphilis in patients with HIV infection in Nigeria. Trop Med Int Health 2005; 10 58–64.
Evaluation of syphilis in patients with HIV infection in Nigeria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FivVyrtg%3D%3D&md5=4a76411d9c8de1323cf7014a3a6d5629CAS | 15655014PubMed |

[10]  Hunter MG, Robertson PW, Post JJ. Significance of isolated reactive treponemal chemiluminescence immunoassay results. J Infect Dis ;
Significance of isolated reactive treponemal chemiluminescence immunoassay results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |