Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Redistribution of monosulfidic black oozes by floodwaters in a coastal acid sulfate soil floodplain

Richard T. Bush A , Leigh A. Sullivan A , Diane Fyfe A and Scott Johnston B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Acid Sulfate Soil Research, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia.

B NSW Agriculture, Grafton, NSW 2460, Australia.

Australian Journal of Soil Research 42(6) 603-607 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR03073
Submitted: 16 May 2003  Accepted: 3 May 2004   Published: 17 September 2004

Abstract

The observations presented in this paper illustrate that significant amounts of monosulfidic black oozes (MBO) were eroded from flood mitigation drainage canals and redistributed across a coastal floodplain during a flood event associated with extreme deoxygenation and a massive fish kill. MBO are organic materials enriched in iron monosulfides and thick layers can accumulate in drains affected by acid sulfate soils. Laboratory studies have demonstrated that MBO can react rapidly when brought into suspension to completely consume dissolved oxygen. The abundance of MBO in flood mitigation drains and their extreme reactivity implicated MBO in the acute deoxygenation of the Richmond River, north-eastern New South Wales, Australia, following a major flood in February 2001. The field observations of MBO redistribution provide valuable evidence to help explain how these materials may interact and contribute to the deoxygenation of floodwaters.

Additional keywords: iron sulfides, pyrite, monosulfides, acid volatile sulfur, deoxygenation, MBO.


References


Berner RA (1970) Sedimentary pyrite formation. American Journal of Science 268, 1–23. open url image1

Brouwer H, Murphy T (1995) Diffusion method for the determination of acid-volatile sulfides (AVS) in sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 13, 1273–1275. open url image1

Bush RT, Fyfe D, Sullivan LA (2004) Occurrence and abundance of monosulfidic-black-ooze in a coastal acid sulfate soil landscape. Australian Journal of Soil Research 42, 609–616.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Johnston SG, Slavich P, Sullivan LA, Hirst P (2003) Artificial drainage of floodwaters from sulfidic backswamps: effects on deoxygenation in an Australian estuary. Marine and Freshwater Research 54, 781–795.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Claff S (2001) Formation and accumulation of sulfides in monosulfidic black drain oozes. (BSc thesis, Southern Cross University, Australia)

Sullivan LA, Bush RT (2001) Report on deoxygenation and acidification of water by monosulfidic black ooze. ‘Floods and fish kills workshop’. Tropical Fruit Research Station, NSW Agriculture, Alstonville., (NSW Agriculture: Alstonville, NSW)

Sullivan LA, Bush RT, McConchie DM (2000) A modified chromium-reducible sulfur method for reduced inorganic sulfur: Optimum reaction time for acid sulfate soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 38, 729–734. open url image1

Sullivan LA, Bush RT, Fyfe D (2002) Acid sulfate soil drain ooze: distribution, behaviour and implications for acidification and deoxygenation of waterways. ‘Acid sulfate soils in Australia and China’. (Eds C Lin, MD Melville, LA Sullivan) pp. 91–99. (Science Press: Beijing)

Tulau, MJ (1999). ‘Acid sulphate soil management priority areas on the Lower Richmond River floodplain.’ (NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation: Sydney)