CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Soil Research   
Soil Research
Journal Banner
  Soil, Land Care & Environmental Research
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

Now Online

Land Resources Surveys


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 46(4)

The fate of phosphorus under contrasting border-check irrigation regimes

R. W. McDowell A C, D. Rowley B

A AgResearch Ltd. Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
B Department of Geography, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.
C Corresponding author. Email: richard.mcdowell@agresearch.co.nz
 
PDF (129 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Flood-irrigation, to the extent that outwash (runoff from border-check bays) occurs, is a major cause of P loss from grazed pastures and has potential to harm surface water quality. We used a combination of rainfall simulation to produce runoff and field sampling of outwash to investigate processes of P loss from treatments receiving no irrigation and irrigation at 10%, 15%, and 20% soil moisture and every 21 days (3w). Intact soil blocks were removed from each treatment, dung removed, soils wetted to about 32% soil moisture, and runoff produced via rainfall simulation. This indicated that P losses were proportional to soil Olsen P concentrations (29.8–51.4 mg Olsen P/kg; 0.096–0.541 mg dissolved reactive P/L). Olsen P concentration was less in those treatments receiving a greater number of irrigations due to increased pasture production and, presumably, loss via outwash. When soil blocks were allowed to dry, concentrations in runoff more than doubled and were paralleled by a decrease in soil microbial biomass P. However, when outwash was sampled in the field, P loss was greater in more frequently irrigated treatments. This was attributed to increased stocking rates and P-release from dung masking any soil effect. However, differences in P loss in outwash from 2 treatments (without recent grazing) were attributed to different soil moisture before irrigation. Assuming 25% of irrigation is lost as outwash, annual loads were estimated to range from 0.7 kg P/ha in the 10% treatment, irrigated 2.6 times a year, to 12.6 kg P/ha in the 3w treatment, irrigated 6.5 times per year. This suggests that the frequency of irrigation and stocking rate dictate the majority of P lost in this system (not soil P concentration). Hence, mitigation practices should be promoted to minimise outwash in intensively sheep-grazed pastures and potential surface water quality impacts.

Keywords: dung, Olsen P, microbial biomass, fertiliser.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013