CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Soil Research   
Soil Research
Journal Banner
  Soil, Land Care & Environmental Research
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

Now Online

Land Resources Surveys


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 48(3)

Tillage practices altered labile soil organic carbon and microbial function without affecting crop yields

Margaret M. Roper A D, V. V. S. R. Gupta B, Daniel V. Murphy C

A CSIRO Plant Industry, Private Bag No. 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.
B CSIRO Entomology, Private Bag No. 2, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
C Soil Biology Group, School of Earth and Environment, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: Margaret.Roper@csiro.au
 
PDF (496 KB) $25
 Supplementary Material
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

A 7-year tillage experiment was conducted on a deep sand in the central wheat belt of Western Australia between 1998 and 2004 to evaluate the impact of tillage intensity [no-tillage (NT), conservation tillage (CT), and rotary tillage (RT)] on soil organic matter, microbial biomass and function, and crop yields in a wheat–lupin rotation. A fourth treatment (subterranean clover pasture, Pasture) with least soil disturbance was included as a comparison. By March 2004, total soil carbon (C) in NT and CT increased by 4.4 and 2.6 t/ha, respectively, to an average of 17.6 t/ha in the top 0.1 m of the soil profile. There was a loss of total soil C in RT (–0.5 t/ha), which was significant compared with the other 2 tillage treatments. Total soil C and nitrogen (N) contents in the pasture treatment were similar to those in NT and CT at the end of the experiment. Labile fractions of soil C responded more rapidly to tillage practice, with significant reductions by 2001 in light fraction C and dissolved organic C in the RT treatment compared with the other 3 treatments. The effect of RT on biology and function was seen early in the experiment and, compared with Pasture, NT, and CT, intense tillage in RT significantly reduced microbial biomass and cellulase activity in the surface 0.05 m by the third year of the experiment. However, at a depth of 0.05–0.10 m there were no significant differences between treatments. Grain yields in NT, CT, and RT were unaffected by tillage except in 2003, when lupin yield under RT (1.6 t/ha) was significantly less than under NT (2.0 t/ha) and CT (1.9 t/ha). Minimal differences between NT and CT are a reflection of the minimum disturbance in the CT treatment, although there were significant differences between CT and NT in microbial indices such as microbial quotient and metabolic quotient, suggesting a future divergence of these treatments.

Keywords: no-tillage, conservation-tillage, rotary-tillage, pasture, microbial biomass.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013