Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Temporal variability of soil water storage evaluated for a coffee field

L. C. Timm A F , D. Dourado-Neto B , O. O. S. Bacchi C , W. Hu D , R. P. Bortolotto B , A. L. Silva E , I. P. Bruno B and K. Reichardt C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Rural Engineering, FAEM, UFPel, Pelotas, RS C.P. 354-96001-970, Brazil.

B Crop Science Department, ESALQ, USP, Piracicaba, SP C.P. 9, 13418-900, Brazil.

C Soil Physics Laboratory, CENA, USP, Piracicaba, SP C.P. 96, 13416-903, Brazil.

D Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

E CTC, Fazenda Santo Antônio, Piracicaba, SP 13400-970, Brazil.

F Corresponding author. Email: lctimm@ufpel.edu.br

Soil Research 49(1) 77-86 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR10023
Submitted: 19 January 2010  Accepted: 13 July 2010   Published: 4 February 2011

Abstract

Sampling field soils to estimate soil water content and soil water storage (S) is difficult due to the spatial variability of these variables, which demands a large number of sampling points. Also, the methodology employed in most cases is invasive and destructive, so that sampling in the same positions at different times is impossible. However, neutron moderation, time domain reflectrometry, and, more recently, frequency domain reflectrometry methodologies allow measurements at the same points over long time intervals. This study evaluates a set of neutron probe data, collected at 15 positions placed randomly along a coffee crop contour line, over 2 years at 14-day intervals. The temporal stability of S was again demonstrated, so that wetter or dryer locations remain so over time, and the definition of such positions in the field reduces the number of sampling points in future S evaluations under similar conditions. An analysis was made to determine the minimum number of sampling points to obtain the average S of the field within a chosen level of significance. Classical statistical analysis indicated that the 15 measurement positions could be reduced to four or even to one position to obtain a reliable field S average. State–time analysis showed S estimations depend more on previous measurements of rainfall P (52%) than on evapotranspiration ET (28%) and S (20%). The analysis also showed that ET was not realistically estimated from previous measurements of S; it was more dependent on previous measurements of ET (59%) than on P (30%) and S (9%). This statistical procedure showed great advantages over classical multiple regressions. Future studies of this type should be carried out at regularly spaced observation points in a grid, in order to allow a 2-D and 3-D state–space–time analysis.

Additional keywords: multiple regression, neutron probe, sampling number, state–space, state–time.


References

Aboitiz M, Labadie JW, Heermann DF (1986) Stochastic soil moisture estimation and forecasting for irrigated fields. Water Resources Research 22, 180–190.
Stochastic soil moisture estimation and forecasting for irrigated fields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) ‘Crop evapotranspiration (guidelines for computing crop water requirements).’ FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. (FAO: Rome)

EMBRAPA – Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solo (2006) ‘Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos.’ (Embrapa Solos: Rio de Janeiro)

Fenilli TAB, Reichardt K, Dourado-Neto D, Trivelin PCO, Favarin JL, Costa FMP, Bacchi OOS (2007) Growth, development and fertilizer N recovery for a coffee crop growing in Brazil. Scientia Agricola 64, 541–547.
Growth, development and fertilizer N recovery for a coffee crop growing in Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlCqsb%2FI&md5=2ca7a763a69abcfaaaf770747e37a67cCAS |

Hills TC, Reynolds SG (1969) Illustrations of soil moisture variability in selected areas and plots of different sizes. Journal of Hydrology 8, 27–47.
Illustrations of soil moisture variability in selected areas and plots of different sizes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hu W, Shao MA, Reichardt K (2010) Using a new criterion to identify sites for mean soil water storage evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 74, 762–773.
Using a new criterion to identify sites for mean soil water storage evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmtVWmsrs%3D&md5=9e0146101029162f12b1b9f4f33eb338CAS |

Hu W, Shao MA, Wang QJ, Reichardt K (2008) Soil water content temporal-spatial variability of the surface layer of a Loess Plateau hillside in China. Scientia Agricola 65, 277–289.
Soil water content temporal-spatial variability of the surface layer of a Loess Plateau hillside in China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hui S, Wendroth O, Parlange MB, Nielsen DR (1998) Soil variability: infiltration relationships of agroecosytems. Journal of Balkan Ecology 1, 21–40.

Kachanoski RG, De Jong E (1988) Scale dependence and temporal persistence of spatial patterns of soil water storage. Water Resources Research 24, 85–91.
Scale dependence and temporal persistence of spatial patterns of soil water storage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Köppen W (1931) ‘Grundriss der klimakunde.’ (Walter D E Guyter & Co.: Berlin)

Mohanty BP, Mousli Z (2000) Saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil water retention properties across a soil-slope transition. Water Resources Research 36, 3311–3324.
Saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil water retention properties across a soil-slope transition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moreti D, Libardi PL, Rocha GC, Lovatti MJ, Aguiar LIG (2007) Avaliação espaço-temporal das armazenagens gravimétrica e volumétrica da água num latossolo com citros. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo 31, 1281–1290.
Avaliação espaço-temporal das armazenagens gravimétrica e volumétrica da água num latossolo com citros.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nielsen DR, Kutílek M (1994) ‘Soil hydrology.’ (Catena Verlag: Reiskirchen, Germany)

Nielsen DR, Wendroth O (2003) ‘Spatial and temporal statistics: sampling field soils and their vegetation.’ (Catena Verlag: Reiskirchen, Germany)

Penman HL (1963) ‘Vegetation and hydrology.’ Tech. Comm. 53. (Commonwealth Bureau of Soils: Harpenden, England)

Reichardt K, Portezan-Filho O, Bacchi OOS, Oliveira JCM, Dourado-Neto D, Pilotto JE, Calvache M (1997) Neutron probe calibration correction by temporal stability parameters of soil water content probability distribution. Scientia Agricola 54, 17–21.
Neutron probe calibration correction by temporal stability parameters of soil water content probability distribution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Special issue]

Shumway RH (1988) ‘Applied statistical time series analysis.’ (Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

Shumway RH, Stoffer DS (1982) An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the EM algorithm. Journal of Time Series Analysis 3, 253–264.
An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the EM algorithm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shumway RH, Stoffer DS (2000) ‘Time series analysis and its applications.’ (Springer: New York)

Silva AL, Bruno IP, Reichardt K, Bacchi OOS, Dourado-Neto D, Favarin JL, Costa FMP, Timm LC (2009) Soil water extraction by roots and Kc for the coffee crop. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 13, 257–261.

Silva AL, Roveratti R, Reichardt K, Bacchi OOS, Timm LC, Bruno IP, Oliveira JCM, Dourado-Neto D (2006) Variability of water balance components in a coffee crop grown in Brazil. Scientia Agricola 63, 153–165.
Variability of water balance components in a coffee crop grown in Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Soil Survey Staff (1993) ‘Soil survey manual.’ (US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC)

Timm LC, Gomes DT, Barbosa EP, Reichardt K, Souza MD, Dynia JF (2006) Neural network and state-space models for studying relationships among soil properties. Scientia Agricola 63, 386–395.
Neural network and state-space models for studying relationships among soil properties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVOntrzO&md5=bb12b5b125089b179bc62bbb808ff3fdCAS |

Vachaud G, Passerat De Silans A, Balabanis P, Vauclin M (1985) Temporal stability of spatially measured soil water probability density function. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49, 822–828.
Temporal stability of spatially measured soil water probability density function.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Warrick AW, Nielsen DR (1980) Spatial variability of soil physical properties in the field. In ‘Applications of soil physics’. (Ed. D Hillel) pp. 319–344. (Academic Press: New York)

Western AW, Grayson RB, Blöschl G (2002) Scaling of soil moisture: a hydrologic perspective. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 205, 20–37.

Western AW, Zhou SL, Grayson RB, McMahon TA, Blöschl G, Wilson DJ (2004) Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes. Journal of Hydrology 286, 113–134.
Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |