Apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) as a surrogate for neutron probe counts to measure soil moisture content in heavy clay soils (Vertosols)
John N. Stanley A B D , David W. Lamb A B , Gregory Falzon A B C and Derek A. Schneider A BA Precision Agriculture Research Group, School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information (CRCSI), Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.
C C4D, School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351.
D Corresponding author. Email: jstanle4@une.edu.au
Soil Research 52(4) 373-378 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR13142
Submitted: 4 May 2013 Accepted: 12 January 2014 Published: 22 April 2014
Abstract
Site-specific measurements of the apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) of soil using the EM38 were correlated with near-simultaneous neutron probe readings over periods of moisture extraction by an irrigated cotton crop. Thirty sites were monitored from three ECa zones within a 96-ha field of grey Vertosol soil 30 km west of Moree, New South Wales, Australia. This study differs from previous approaches by reporting the effect on ECa of a wetting front (irrigation) reaching a single ECa measurement point in a field and by using polyethylene neutron probe access tubes so that the EM38 could be operated directly over the same site measured by a neutron probe. We report strong correlations (r = 0.94) between neutron probe counts (CRR) averaged to a depth of 40 or 60 cm and ECa from an EM38 held in the vertical mode 20 cm above the soil surface. All combinations of EM sensor height (0–1.2 m) to neutron probe measurement depth (0.2–1.4 m) returned correlations >0.85. The relationship between CCR and ECa was linear for the purposes of estimating water content over a range of background ECa levels. More critical modelling suggested a slight curve (logarithmic model) fitted best. The range of surface-surveyed ECa from the start of irrigation (refill point) to fully irrigated (full point) was ~27 mS m–1 for this Vertosol, where surface ECa readings typically ranged from 50 to 200 mS m–1. We suggest that the calibration of ECa to CRR might be effected by a two-point measurement of the soil, namely at both upper (field capacity) and lower (wilting point) ECa values, and a site-specific calibration template generated by extending these point measures to whole-field surveys.
Additional keywords: ΔECa, electromagnetic induction survey, precision agriculture, spatial water use.
References
Dang YP, Dalal RC, Pringle MJ, Biggs AJW, Darr S, Sauer B, Moss J, Payne J, Orange D (2011) Electromagnetic induction sensing of soil identifies constraints to the crop yields of north-eastern Australia. Soil Research 49, 559–571.| Electromagnetic induction sensing of soil identifies constraints to the crop yields of north-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Finley AO, Banerjee S (2010) ‘MBA: Multilevel B-spline Approximation. R package version 0.0-7.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria)
Greacen EL (1981) ‘Soil water assessment by the neutron method.’ (CSIRO: Adelaide, S. Aust.)
Hossain MB, Lamb DW, Lockwood PV, Frazier P (2010) EM38 for volumetric soil moisture content in deep vertosol soils. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 74, 100–109.
| EM38 for volumetric soil moisture content in deep vertosol soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huth N, Poulton P (2007) An electromagnetic induction method for monitoring variation in soil moisture in agroforestry systems. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45, 63–72.
| An electromagnetic induction method for monitoring variation in soil moisture in agroforestry systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Isbell R (2003) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ Revised edn (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)
Kachanoski RG, Gregorich EG, van Wesenbeeck IJ (1988) Estimating spatial variation of soil water content using noncontact electromagnetic inductive methods. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 68, 715–722.
| Estimating spatial variation of soil water content using noncontact electromagnetic inductive methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Khakural BR, Robert PC, Hugins DR (1998) Use of non-contacting electromagnetic conduction methods for estimating soil moisture across a landscape. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 29, 2055–2065.
| Use of non-contacting electromagnetic conduction methods for estimating soil moisture across a landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXlvVWgtbc%3D&md5=f7cde4c310700272215f8e9f69020e13CAS |
McNeill JD (1992) Rapid, accurate mapping of soil salinity by electromagnetic ground conductivity meters. In ‘Advances in measurement of soil physical properties: ringing theory into practice’. Special Publication No. 30. pp. 209–229. (SSSA: Madison WI, USA)
Morris ER (2009) Height-above-ground effects on penetration depth and response of electromagnetic induction soil conductivity meters. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 68, 150–156.
| Height-above-ground effects on penetration depth and response of electromagnetic induction soil conductivity meters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Padhi J, Misra RK (2011) Sensitivity of EM38 in determining soil water distribution in an irrigated wheat field. Soil & Tillage Research 117, 93–102.
| Sensitivity of EM38 in determining soil water distribution in an irrigated wheat field.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Development Core Team (2013) ‘nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-111.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria)
R Development Core Team (2013) ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at: www.R-project.org/
Sheets JV, Hendrickx JMH (1995) Noninvasive soil moisture content measurement using electromagnetic induction. Water Resources Research 31, 2401–2409.
| Noninvasive soil moisture content measurement using electromagnetic induction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Slavich PG, Petterson GH (1993) Estimating the electrical conductivity of saturated paste extracts from 1 : 5 soil:water suspensions and texture. Australian Journal of Soil Research 31, 73–81.
| Estimating the electrical conductivity of saturated paste extracts from 1 : 5 soil:water suspensions and texture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smiles DE (1984) Water relations of cracking clay soils. In ‘The properties and utilization of cracking clay soils. Proceedings of a Symposium’. 24–28 August 1981, University of New England, Armidale, NSW. Reviews in Rural Science 5. (Eds JW McGarity, EH Hoult, HB So) pp. 143–149. (University of New England: Armidale, NSW)
Stanley JN, Schneider DA, Lamb DW (2012) Site-specific measurements of apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) correlate to neutron moisture probe counts: Towards the spatial measurement of soil moisture content for precision agriculture. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Agronomy Conference’. 14–18 October 2012. Armidale, NSW. (Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute Ltd: Gosford, NSW)
Sudduth KA, Drummond ST, Kitchen NR (2001) Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 31, 239–264.
| Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Triantafilis J, Lesch SM (2005) Mapping clay content variation using electromagnetic induction techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46, 203–237.
| Mapping clay content variation using electromagnetic induction techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Triantafilis J, Laslett GM, McBratney AB (2000) Calibrating an electromagnetic induction instrument to measure salinity in soil under irrigated cotton. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 1009–1017.
| Calibrating an electromagnetic induction instrument to measure salinity in soil under irrigated cotton.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXms1Cjsrs%3D&md5=5d6e9d31af3fe9f21cb1d3a93c7ec909CAS |
Yule DF (1984) Volumetric calculations in cracking clay soils. In ‘The properties and utilization of cracking clay soils. Proceedings of a Symposium’. 24–28 August 1981, University of New England, Armidale, NSW. Reviews in Rural Science 5. (Eds JW McGarity, EH Hoult, HB So) pp. 136–140. (University of New England: Armidale, NSW)
