Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Day roost selection by female little forest bats (Vespadelus vulturnus) within remnant woodland on Phillip Island, Victoria

Susan Campbell A D , Linda F. Lumsden B , Roger Kirkwood C and Graeme Coulson A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B Arthur Rylah Institute, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.

C Phillip Island Nature Park, Phillip Island, Vic. 3922, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: s.campbell3@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au

Wildlife Research 32(2) 183-191 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04039
Submitted: 8 May 2004  Accepted: 24 February 2005   Published: 4 May 2005

Abstract

The day roosting behaviour of the little forest bat (Vespadelus vulturnus), Australia’s smallest bat, was investigated in the context of the planned removal of dead timber within managed woodlands on Phillip Island, Victoria. Between August 1999 and March 2000, 14 female little forest bats were fitted with VHF microtransmitters and tracked to a total of 16 roost trees. All roosts were located in dead timber, 11 in severely decayed remains of eucalypt trees, and five in dead sections of live trees. Roost trees were compared with randomly chosen trees from within the available habitat, for a range of tree characteristics. Female little forest bats selected roosts in trees with dead timber offering many hollows and reduced canopy cover. Furthermore, roost trees were located in areas (0.1-ha plots) with higher densities of these types of trees than in the available habitat. However, there was no difference in the height or diameter of roost trees or roost plots compared with available habitat. Emergence time from roosts was strongly associated with civil twilight (when the centre of the sun is 6° below an ideal horizon), and the number of bats exiting a single roost tree ranged from 1 to 120 (median = 20). Dead trees provide critical roosting habitat and we recommend retention of dead standing trees for conserving little forest bat roosts in managed woodlands.


Acknowledgments

We thank the Phillip Island Nature Park for allowing access to the KCC and purchasing the transmitters. These transmitters were supplied and maintained by David Titley of Titley Electronics. The project could not have been possible without the advice and guidance of Ashley Reed and the many hours of field assistance generously donated by Nat Czarny, Tom Keeble, and many other volunteers. Thank you to Brad Law for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This work was conducted under Ethics Permit 1.99 from the Phillip Island Nature Park Animal Experimentation and Ethics Committee and Research Permit 10000620 from the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria.


References

Aldridge, H. D. J. N. , and Brigham, R. M. (1988). Load carrying and manoeuvrability in an insectivorous bat: a test of the 5% “rule” of radio-telemetry. Journal of Mammalogy 69, 379–382.
Campbell S. (2000). Roost-site selection by female little forest bats (Vespadelus vulturnus) on Phillip Island, Victoria. B.Sc.(Honours) Thesis, University of Melbourne.

Churchill S. (1998). ‘Australian Bats.’ (Reed New Holland: Sydney.)

Common I. F. B. (1990). ‘Moths of Australia.’ (Melbourne University Press: Melbourne.)

Gibbons, P. , and Lindenmayer, D. B. (1996). Issues associated with the retention of hollow-bearing trees within eucalypt forests managed for production. Forest Ecology and Management 83, 245–279.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kunz T. H. (1982). Roosting ecology. In ‘Ecology of Bats’. (Ed. T. H. Kunz.) pp. 1–55. (Plenum Press: New York.)

Kunz T. H., and Lumsden L. F. (2003). Ecology of cavity and foliage roosting bats. In ‘Bat Ecology’. (Eds T. H. Kunz and M. B. Fenton.) pp. 3–89. (The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.)

Law, B. S. , and Anderson, J. (2000). Roost preferences and foraging ranges of the eastern forest bat Vespadelus pumilus under two disturbance histories in northern New South Wales, Australia. Austral Ecology 25, 352–367.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McNab B. K. (1982). Evolutionary alternatives in the physiological ecology of bats. In ‘Ecology of Bats’. (Ed. T. H. Kunz.) pp. 151–200. (Plenum Press: New York.)

Menkhorst, P. W. (1984). Use of nest boxes by forest vertebrates in Gippsland: acceptance, preference and demand. Australian Wildlife Research 11, 255–264.
Sasse D. B., and Perkins P. J. (1996). Summer roosting ecology of northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis) in the White Mountain National Park. In ‘Bats and Forests Symposium, October 19–21, 1995, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada’. (Eds R. M. R. Barclay and R. M. Brigham.) pp. 91–101. (British Columbia Ministry of Forests: Victoria, Canada.)

Saunders, D. A. , Smith, G. T. , and Rowley, I. (1982). The availability and dimensions of tree hollows that provide nest sites for cockatoos (Psittaciformes) in Western Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 9, 541–556.
Turbill C. (1999). Thermal biology and roost selection of long-eared bats, Nyctophilus geoffroyi. B.Sc.(Honours) Thesis, University of New England, Armidale.

Tuttle, M. D. (1976). Population ecology of the gray bat (Myotis grisescens): factors influencing growth and survival of newly volant young. Ecology 57, 587–595.
Vonhof M. J. (1996). Roost-site preferences of big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) and silver-haired bats (Lasionycteris noctivagans) in the Pend d’Oreille Valley in southern British Columbia. In ‘Bats and Forests Symposium, October 19–21, 1995, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada’. (Eds R. M. R. Barclay and R. M. Brigham.) pp. 62–80. (British Columbia Ministry of Forests: Victoria, Canada.)

Vonhof, M. J. , and Barclay, R. M. R. (1996). Roost-site selection and roosting ecology of forest-dwelling bats in southern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74, 1797–1805.


Young, R. A. , and Ford, G. I. (2000). Bat fauna of a semi-arid environment in central western Queensland Australian Wildlife Research 27, 203–215.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |