CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Wildlife Research   
Wildlife Research
Journal Banner
  Ecology, Management and Conservation in Natural and Modified Habitats
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Referee Guidelines
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 39(4)

Genetically defining populations is of limited use for evaluating and managing human impacts on gene flow

Adam J. Stow A C and William E. Magnusson B

A Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
B Coordenação da Biodiversidade, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, CP 478, 69011-970 Manaus AM, Brazil.
C Corresponding author. Email: adam.stow@mq.edu.au

Wildlife Research 39(4) 290-294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR11150
Submitted: 15 August 2011  Accepted: 2 March 2012   Published: 8 May 2012


 
PDF (114 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

Partitioning genetic variation into panmictic units is one of the most commonly used techniques in genetic studies of wild organisms. For conservation, the rationale is to identify units for management, most often referred to as populations. Describing these populations provides a measure of genetic differentiation, but they are only management units in relation to specific objectives. In situ conservation activities are mostly constrained to landscape (or ‘seascape’) units. With continuing habitat fragmentation, maintaining gene flow and genetic variation is an underlying objective for many conservation activities. Spatially explicit genetic approaches can describe how gene flow varies across a landscape, but the popular approach of identifying populations has limited and specific application. The statistical tests and sampling procedures used seldom allow for the spatial extent of genetic panmixia to be precisely defined. Gene flow, genetic variation and genetic detection of individual movements can be estimated without reference to populations. Furthermore, the term ‘population’ is used inconsistently in the literature and is often poorly defined. Formulating appropriate questions for management requires that the unit of study is clearly described, and often this could be organisms inhabiting defined areas of the landscape. Resources for conservation management are limited, so geneticists working on gene flow in wild organisms need to frame questions relevant to specific management needs and carefully consider the language and approaches employed.



References

Allendorf, F. W., England, P. R., Luikart, G., Ritchie, P. A., and Ryman, N. (2008). Genetic effects of harvest on wild animal populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23, 327–337.
CrossRef |

Bergl, R. A., and Vigilant, L. (2006). Genetic analysis reveals population structure and recent migration within the highly fragmented range of the Cross River gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli). Molecular Ecology 16, 501–516.
CrossRef |

Bowcock, A. M., Ruíz-Linares, A., Tomfohrde, J., Minch, E., Kidd, J. R., and Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1994). High resolution human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368, 455–457.
CrossRef | CAS |

Carr, D., Bowman, J., Kyle, C. J., Tully, S. M., Koen, E. L., Robitaille, F., and Wilson, P. J. (2007). Rapid homogenisation of multiple sources: genetic structure of recolonising populations of fishers. Wildlife Management 71, 1853–1861.
CrossRef |

Cullingham, C. I., Pond, B. A., Kyle, S. C., Rees, E. E., Rosatte, R. C., and White, B. N. (2008). Combining direct and indirect genetic methods to estimate dispersal for informing wildlife disease management decisions. Molecular Ecology 17, 4874–4886.
CrossRef | CAS |

Cushman, S. A., and Landguth, E. L. (2010a). Scale dependent inference in landscapegenetics. Landscape Ecology 25, 967–979.
CrossRef |

Cushman, S. A., and Landguth, E. L. (2010b). Spurious correlations and inferences in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology 19, 3592–3602.
CrossRef |

Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., and De Campos Telles, M. P. (2002). Spatial autocorrelation analysis and the identification of operational units for conservation in continuous populations. Conservation Biology 16, 924–935.
CrossRef |

Dyer, R. J., Nason, J. D., and Garrick, R. C. (2010). Landscape modelling of geneflow: improved power using conditional genetic distance derived from the topology of population networks. Molecular Ecology 19, 3746–3759.
CrossRef |

Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., Helkowski, J. H., Holloway, T., Howard, E. A., Kucharik, C. J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J. A., Prentice, I. C., Ramankutty, N., and Snyder, P. K. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570–574.
CrossRef | CAS |

Frankham, R. (2010). Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go? Conservation Genetics 11, 661–663.
CrossRef |

Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., and Briscoe, D. A. (2010). ‘Introduction to Conservation Genetics.’ 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., Eldridge, M. D. B., Lacy, R. C., Ralls, K., Dudash, M. R., and Fenester, C. B. (2011). Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conservation Biology 25, 465–475.
CrossRef |

Guillot, G., Leblois, R., Coulon, A., and Frantz, A. C. (2009). Statistical methods in spatial genetics. Molecular Ecology 18, 4734–4756.
CrossRef |

Jaquiéry, J., Broquet, T., Hirzel, A. H., Yearsley, J., and Perrin, N. (2011). Inferring landscape effects on dispersal from genetic distances: how far can we go? Molecular Ecology 20, 692–705.
CrossRef |

Jombart, T., Dufour, A. B., and Pontier, D. (2008). Revealing cryptic spatial patterns in genetic variability by a new multivariate method. Heredity 101, 92–103.
CrossRef | CAS |

Jones, M. E., Paetkau, D., Geffen, E., and Moritz, C. (2004). Genetic diversity and population structure of Tasmanian devils, the largest marsupial carnivore. Molecular Ecology 13, 2197–2209.
CrossRef | CAS |

Lachish, S., Miller, K. J., Storfer, A., Goldizen, A. W., and Jones, M. E. (2011). Evidence that disease-induced population decline changes genetic structure and alters dispersal patterns in the Tasmanian devil. Heredity 106, 172–182.
CrossRef | CAS |

Laikre, L. (2010). Genetic diversity is overlooked in international policy implementation. Conservation Genetics 11, 349–354.
CrossRef |

Landguth, E. L., Cushman, S. A., Schwartz, M. K., McKelvey, K. S., Murphy, M., and Luikart, G. (2010). Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Molecular Ecology 19, 4179–4191.
CrossRef |

Lowe, W. H., and Allendorf, F. W. (2010). What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? Molecular Ecology 19, 3038–3051.
CrossRef |

Manel, S., Gaggiotti, O. E., and Waples, R. S. (2005). Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20, 136–142.
CrossRef |

Moritz, C. (2002). Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Systematic Biology 51, 238–254.
CrossRef |

Moyle, L. C., Stinchcombe, J. R., Hudgens, B. R., and Morris, W. F. (2003). Conservation genetics in the recovery of endangered animal species: a review of US endangered species recovery plans (1977–1998). Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 26, 85–95.

Murphy, M. A., Evans, J. S., Cushman, S., and Storfer, A. (2008). Representing genetic variation as continuous surfaces: an approach for identifying spatial dependency in landscape genetic studies. Ecography 31, 685–697.
CrossRef |

Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., and Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959.
| CAS |

Pullin, A. S., and Stewart, G. B. (2006). Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology 20, 1647–1656.
CrossRef |

Sarre, S. D., and Georges, A. (2009). Genetics in conservation and wildlife management: a revolution since Caughley. Wildlife Research 36, 70–80.
CrossRef | CAS |

Schwartz, M. K., and McKelvey, K. S. (2009). Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Conservation Genetics 10, 441–452.
CrossRef |

Simmons, J. M., Sunnucks, P., Taylor, A. C., and van der Ree, R. (2010). Beyond roadkill, radiotracking, recapture and FST – a review of some genetic methods to improve understanding of the influence of roads on wildlife. Ecology and Society 15, 9.

Storfer, A., Murphy, M. A., Spear, S. F., Holderegger, R., and Waits, L. P. (2010). Landscape genetics: where are we now? Molecular Ecology 19, 3496–3514.
CrossRef |

Stow, A. J., and Sunnucks, P. (2004). High mate and site fidelity in Cunningham’s skinks (Egernia cunninghami) in natural and fragmented habitat. Molecular Ecology 13, 419–430.
CrossRef | CAS |

Sunnucks, P. (2010). Towards modelling persistence of woodland birds: the role of genetics. Emu 1, 19–39.

Sunnucks, P., and Taylor, A. (2008). The application of genetic markers to landscape management. In ‘Landscape Management and Visualisation: Spatial Models for Natural Resource Management and Planning’. (Eds C. Pettit, W. Cartwright, I. Bishop, K. Lowell, D. Pullar and D. Duncan.) pp. 211–234. (Springer: Berlin.)

Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M., and Knight, T. M. (2004). The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19, 305–308.
CrossRef |

Taylor, B. L., and Dizon, A. E. (1999). First policy then science: why a management unit based soley on genetic criteria cannot work. Molecular Ecology 8, S11–S16.
CrossRef | CAS |

Waples, R. S., and Gaggiotti, O. (2006). What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Molecular Ecology 15, 1419–1439.
CrossRef | CAS |

Weeks, A. R., Sgro, C. M., Young, A. G., Frankham, R., Mitchell, N. J., Miller, K. A., Byrne, M., Coates, D. G., Eldridge, M. D. B., Sunnucks, P., Breed, M. F., James, E. A., and Hoffmann, A. A. (2011). Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective. Evolutionary Applications 4, 709–725.
CrossRef |

Wells, J. V., and Richmond, M. E. (1995). Populations, metapopulations, and species populations: what are they and who should care? Wildlife Society Bulletin 23, 458–462.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 
    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013