Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Does the introduced bumblebee, Bombus terrestris (Apidae), prefer flowers of introduced or native plants in Australia?

Andrew B. Hingston
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. Email: hingston@utas.edu.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 53(1) 29-34 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO04048
Submitted: 17 June 2004  Accepted: 15 December 2004   Published: 24 February 2005

Abstract

Proponents of importation of the European bumblebee, Bombus terrestris (L.), into Australia for pollination of commercial greenhouse crops argue that this species will have little impact on Australian native ecosystems because it prefers to forage on flowers of introduced species of plants rather than Australian native plants. However, data presented as evidence of preference for introduced plants have been equivocal. This study compared the attractiveness of introduced and Australian native plants to free-foraging B. terrestris in a garden at the interface between an urban area and native vegetation in the Australian island of Tasmania, where a feral population of B. terrestris had been established for over 10 years. No evidence was found to support the proposal that B. terrestris forages on flowers of introduced plants in preference to those of Australian native plants. The numbers of B. terrestris seen foraging per 1000 flowers did not differ significantly between introduced plants and Australian native plants, and the preferred food sources of B. terrestris included flowers of both introduced and Australian native species. Because B. terrestris forages frequently on many species of both introduced and native plants, assessments of its ecological impacts must include the effects of altered pollination on recruitment rates in both introduced weeds and native plants, and reduced quantities of nectar and pollen of native plants on recruitment rates of dependent fauna.


Acknowledgments

I thank Alex Buchanan for advice on nomenclature of plant species, an anonymous referee for helpful comments, and Maj-Britt di Folco for discussions on statistical techniques.


References

Andersson, S. (1988). Size-dependent pollination efficiency in Anchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae): causes and consequences. Oecologia 76, 125–130.
Commonwealth of Australia (1997). ‘The National Weeds Strategy.’ (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.)

Cooke, A. (2001). Bumblebees under study. Practical Hydroponics and Greenhouses 59, 20–24.
Goodwin S., and Steiner M. (1997). Introduction of Bombus terrestris for biological pollination of horticultural crops in Australia. A submission to AQIS and Environment Australia. Gosford IPM Services, Gosford. Available at http://www.tmag.tas.gov.au/workshop/ append2.html [Verified 13 January 2005].

Goodwin S., and Steiner M. (1999). Background to a submission to Environment Australia. In ‘Workshop on Possible Introduction of Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) for Pollination of Horticultural Crops in Australia’. (Ed. R. E. Buttermore.) (Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery: Hobart.) Available at http://www.tmag.tas.gov.au/workshop/proceedings.html [Verified 13 January 2005].

Goulson, D. (2003). Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34, 1–26.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hergstrom K., Buttermore R., Seeman O., and McCorkell B. (2002). Environmental research on the impact of bumblebees in Australia and facilitation of national communication for/against further introduction. Horticulture Australia Project No: VG99033.

Hingston, A. B. , and McQuillan, P. B. (1998a). Does the recently introduced bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Apidae) threaten Australian ecosystems? Australian Journal of Ecology 23, 539–549.
Moller H., and Raffaelli D. (1998). Predicting risks from new organisms: the potential of community press experiments. In ‘Proceedings of the Conference on Statistics in Ecology and Environmental Monitoring. 2: Decision Making and Risk Assessment in Biology’. (Eds D. L. Fletcher, L. Kavalieris and B. F. J. Manly.) pp. 131–156. (University of Otago Press for the Centre for Applications of Statistics and Mathematics, University of Otago: Dunedin.)

Ohashi, K. , and Yahara, T. (2002). Visit larger displays but probe proportionally fewer flowers: counterintuitive behaviour of nectar-collecting bumble bees achieves an ideal free distribution. Functional Ecology 16, 492–503.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Paton D. C. (1996). ‘Overview of feral and managed honeybees in Australia: distribution, abundance, extent of interactions with native biota, evidence of impacts and future research.’ (Australian Nature Conservation Agency: Canberra.)

Prŷs-Jones O. E., and Corbet S. A. (1991). ‘Bumblebees.’ (The Richmond Publishing Co. Ltd: Slough, UK.)

Robertson, A. W. , and Macnair, M. R. (1995). The effects of floral display size on pollinator service to individual flowers of Myosotis and Mimulus. Oikos 72, 106–114.
Thorp R. W. (2003). Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): commercial use and environmental concerns. In ‘Symposium Proceedings of the Entomological Society of America. For Non-Native Crops, Whence Pollinators of the Future?’. (Eds K. Strickler and J. Cane.) Chapter 2. (Entomological Society of America: Lanham, MD.)

Williams, N. M. , Minckley, R. L. , and Silveira, F. A. (2001). Variation in native bee faunas and its implications for detecting community changes. Conservation Ecology 5, 7.[Verified 13 January 2005]
Wilson A. (1999). Bumblebee workshop presentation. In ‘Workshop on Possible Introduction of Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) for Pollination of Horticultural Crops in Australia’. (Ed. R. E. Buttermore.) (Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery: Hobart.) Available at http://www.tmag.tas.gov.au/workshop/proceedings.html [Verified 13 January 2005].