CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Australian Journal of Zoology
  Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Zoology   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Numerical Taxonomy of Australian Species of 9 Genera of Scolopendrid Centipedes (Chilopoda, Scolopendridae)

LE Koch and DH Colless

Abstract

Data on 32 characters of each of 35 Australian species in nine scolopendrid genera (Scolopendrinae: Arthrorhabdus, Asanada, Colobopleurus, Cormocephalus, Notiasemus, Scolopendra; Otostigminae: Ethmostigmus, Otostigmus, Rhysida) are analysed by means of various numerical procedures (Phenetic: principal components, nearest and furthest neighbour, WPGMA, UPGMA, a new 'variable' method, PHD, minimum spanning tree, three types of consensus trees, CRAMER; Cladistic: Wagner trees, Farris optimization, ADTREE). A few scolopendrine species form a 'primitive' cluster with the outgroup, Cryptopidae. The species inermis is removed from Cormocephalus and reinstated in its original genus Cupipes. Colobopleurus inopinatus groups inseparably in Cormocephalus and is transferred to it. Arthrorhabdus mjobergi often links with Scolopendra and consistently separates widely from A. paucispinus, which is similar to extralimital members of the genus. With the above provisos, the various species generally group together in their currently recognized genera, and Scolopendra (two species) and Cormocephalus, sensu lato (17 species) emerge as particularly 'strong' genera. Cormocephalus, as in previous analyses, tends to have subgroups of varying degrees of consistency but these are considered inadequately robust to warrant receiving formal subgeneric status. The three otostigmine genera are 'strong' and cluster near each other: Rhysida and Otostigmus are particularly 'good' genera; Ethmostigmus has two consistently strong segments. The cladograms are, as usual, highly asymmetrical (pectinate) at upper levels. They provide a putative evolutionary tree, but a very unsatisfactory basis for a 'phylogenetic' classification.

Australian Journal of Zoology 34(1) 87 - 105  doi:10.1071/ZO9860087

  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (782 KB) $25
Export Citation
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010