Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Facilitators of and barriers to high-resolution anoscopy adherence among men who have sex with men: a qualitative study

Kaan Z. Apaydin A , Andy Nguyen B , Lori Panther A , Derri L. Shtasel B C , Sannisha K. Dale C D , Christina P. C. Borba E F , Christopher S. Lathan B G , Kenneth Mayer A B H and Alex S. Keuroghlian A B C I
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Fenway Institute, 1340 Boylston St., Boston, MA 02215, USA.

B Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

C Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02214, USA.

D Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA.

E Department of Psychiatry, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

F Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02218, USA.

G Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

H Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

I Corresponding author. Email: akeuroghlian@partners.org

Sexual Health 15(5) 431-440 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH18029
Submitted: 23 February 2018  Accepted: 31 May 2018   Published: 24 September 2018

Abstract

Background: Anal cancer is a rare malignancy that disproportionately affects men who have sex with men (MSM) and HIV-infected people. Anal cancer is associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) in upward of 90% of cases and is preceded by pre-cancerous changes in cells of the anal canal. High-resolution anoscopy (HRA) is used for the detection, treatment and continued monitoring of anal dysplasia. Practice guidelines regarding anal cancer prevention vary by jurisdiction and institution, and patient engagement is low for high-risk populations such as MSM. The purpose of this study is to characterise perceptions among MSM of barriers to and facilitators of their adherence to HRA follow-up recommendations. Methods: Surveys and in-person focus groups with MSM who were either adherent or non-adherent to HRA follow-up recommendations at a Federally Qualified Health Centre in Boston, MA, which specialises in sexual and gender minority care, were conducted. Facilitators of and barriers to follow-up were identified by deductive content analysis. Results: Focus group participants identified the following barriers to and facilitators of HRA follow up: (1) patient-level beliefs about HPV-related disease or HRA, ability to engage in care, internalised stigma and physical discomfort; (2) provider-level knowledge and expertise, communication skills and relationship-building with patient; and (3) systems-level societal stigma and healthcare system inefficiencies. Conclusions: Reinforcing facilitators of and reducing barriers to HRA follow up may improve adherence among MSM. This includes improvements to: patient education, provider training to increase knowledge and cultural sensitivity, public awareness about HPV-related anal cancer, physical discomfort associated with HRA and systems inefficiencies.

Additional keywords: anal cancer, high-resolution anoscopy, HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HPV, human papillomavirus, men who have sex with men.


References

[1]  Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Neyman N, Altekruse SF (Eds.). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2010. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Cancer Institute; 2013. Available online at: https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2010/ [verified 7 May 2018].

[2]  De Vuyst H, Clifford GM, Nascimento MC, Madeleine MM, Franceschi S. Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva, vagina and anus: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2009; 124 1626–36.
Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva, vagina and anus: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Frisch M, Fenger C, van den Brule AJC, Sørensen P, Meijer CJLM, Walboomers JMM. Variants of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and perianal skin and their relation to human papillomaviruses. Cancer Res 1999; 59 753–7.

[4]  Kobayashi T, Sigel K, Gaisa M. Prevalence of anal dysplasia in human immunodeficiency virus–infected transgender women. Sex Transm Dis 2017; 44 714–6.
Prevalence of anal dysplasia in human immunodeficiency virus–infected transgender women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  Daling JR, Weiss NS, Hislop TG, Maden C, Coates RJ, Sherman KJ. Sexual practices, sexually transmitted diseases, and the incidence of anal cancer. N Engl J Med 1987; 317 973–7.
Sexual practices, sexually transmitted diseases, and the incidence of anal cancer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Silverberg MJ, Lau B, Justice AC, Engels E, Gill MJ, Goedert JJ. Risk of anal cancer in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals in North America. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54 1026–34.
Risk of anal cancer in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals in North America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7]  Palefsky JM. Human papillomavirus and anal intraepithelial neoplasia. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2008; 5 78–85.
Human papillomavirus and anal intraepithelial neoplasia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Palefsky JM, Holly EA, Hogeboom CJ, Berry JM, Jay N, Darragh TM. Anal cytology as a screening tool for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1997; 14 415–22.
Anal cytology as a screening tool for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Palefsky JM. Practicing high-resolution anoscopy. Sex Health 2012; 9 580–6.
Practicing high-resolution anoscopy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Berry-Lawhorn JM, Palefsky JM. Progression of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions to anal squamous cell carcinoma and clinical management of anal superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 2017; 28 91–6.
Progression of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions to anal squamous cell carcinoma and clinical management of anal superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Esser S, Kreuter A, Oette M, Gingelmaier A, Mosthaf F, Sautter-Bihl ML. German-Austrian guidelines on anal dysplasia and anal cancer in HIV-positive individuals: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. JDDG - J Ger Soc Dermatology 2015; 13 1302–1319.
German-Austrian guidelines on anal dysplasia and anal cancer in HIV-positive individuals: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Macaya A, Muñoz-Santos C, Balaguer A, Barberà MJ. Interventions for anal canal intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 1–25.
Interventions for anal canal intraepithelial neoplasia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, HPV-Associated Cancers and Precancers. Atlanta: CDC; 2016. Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/hpv-cancer.htm [verified 8 May 2018].

[14]  The Anchor Study. 2017. Available online at: https://anchorstudy.org/ [verified February 2018].

[15]  Machalek DA, Grulich AE, Hillman RJ, Jin F, Templeton DJ, Tabrizi SN. The Study of the Prevention of Anal Cancer (SPANC): design and methods of a three-year prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 2013; 13
The Study of the Prevention of Anal Cancer (SPANC): design and methods of a three-year prospective cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Aberg JA, Gallant JE, Anderson J, Oleske JM, Libman H, Currier JS. Primary care guidelines for the management of persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus: recommendations of the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39 609–29.
Primary care guidelines for the management of persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus: recommendations of the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) AIDS Institute (AI). Anal dysplasia and cancer guideline. New York: NYSDOH; 2018. Available online at: https://www.hivguidelines.org/adult-hiv/preventive-care-screening/anal-dysplasia-cancer/ [verified June 2017].

[18]  Hillman RJ, Cuming T, Darragh T, Nathan M, Berry-Lawthorn M, Goldstone S. 2016 IANS International guidelines for practice standards in the detection of anal cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2016; 20 283–91.
2016 IANS International guidelines for practice standards in the detection of anal cancer precursors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Palefsky JM, Holly EA, Ralston ML, Da Costa M, Greenblatt RM. Prevalence and risk factors for anal human papillomavirus infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–positive and high‐risk HIV‐negative women. J Infect Dis 2001; 183 383–91.
Prevalence and risk factors for anal human papillomavirus infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–positive and high‐risk HIV‐negative women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Palefsky JM, Holly EA, Ralston ML, Jay N. Prevalence and risk factors for human papillomavirus infection of the anal canal in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative homosexual men. J Infect Dis 1998; 177 361–7.
Prevalence and risk factors for human papillomavirus infection of the anal canal in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative homosexual men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Patel HS, Silver AR, Levine T, Williams G, Northover JM. Human papillomavirus infection and anal dysplasia in renal transplant recipients. Br J Surg 2010; 97 1716–21.
Human papillomavirus infection and anal dysplasia in renal transplant recipients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Safaeian M, Solomon D, Castle PE. Cervical cancer prevention-cervical screening: science in evolution. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2007; 34 739–60.
Cervical cancer prevention-cervical screening: science in evolution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  D’Souza G, Rajan SD, Bhatia R, Cranston RD, Plankey MW, Silvestre A. Uptake and predictors of anal cancer screening in men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health 2013; 103 e88–e95.
Uptake and predictors of anal cancer screening in men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Koskan AM, LeBlanc N, Rosa-Cunha I. Exploring the perceptions of anal cancer screening and behaviors among gay and bisexual men infected with HIV. Cancer Control 2016; 23 52–58.
Exploring the perceptions of anal cancer screening and behaviors among gay and bisexual men infected with HIV.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25]  Nadarzynski T, Smith H, Richardson D, Jones CJ, Llewellyn CD. Human papillomavirus and vaccine-related perceptions among men who have sex with men: a systematic review. Sex Transm Infect 2014; 90 515–23.
Human papillomavirus and vaccine-related perceptions among men who have sex with men: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[26]  Newman PA, Roberts KJ, Masongsong E, Wiley DJ. Anal cancer screening: barriers and facilitators among ethnically diverse gay, bisexual, transgender, and other men who have sex with men. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv 2008; 20 328–53.
Anal cancer screening: barriers and facilitators among ethnically diverse gay, bisexual, transgender, and other men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  Scambler G. Health-related stigma. Sociol Health Illn 2009; 31 441–55.
Health-related stigma.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[28]  Hatzenbuehler ML, Pachankis JE. Stigma and minority stress as social determinants of health among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Pediatr Clin North Am 2016; 63 985–97.
Stigma and minority stress as social determinants of health among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  Palefsky JM, Holly EA, Hogeboom CJ, Berry JM, Jay N, Darragh TM. Anal cytology as a screening tool for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1997; 14 415–22.
Anal cytology as a screening tool for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[30]  University of California San Francisco Anal Dysplasia Clinic. HRA Provider List. San Francisco, CA: University of California, San Francisco; 2014. Available online at: http://analcancerinfo.ucsf.edu/hra-provider-list [verified February 2018].

[31]  Davis TW, Goldstone SE, Chen G. Tolerability of anal dysplasia screening. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2013; 17 404–8.
Tolerability of anal dysplasia screening.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[32]  Tariq S, Woodman J. Using mixed methods in health research. JRSM Short Rep 2013; 4 1–8.
Using mixed methods in health research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[33]  Fenkl EA, Schochet E, Jones SG, da Costa BR. Evaluation of an HPV/anal cancer screening awareness program for HIV-infected men who have sex with men. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2015; 26 492–7.
Evaluation of an HPV/anal cancer screening awareness program for HIV-infected men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Thomas EA, Goldstone SE. Should I or shouldn’t I: decision making, knowledge and behavioral effects of quadrivalent HPV vaccination in men who have sex with men. Vaccine 2011; 29 570–6.
Should I or shouldn’t I: decision making, knowledge and behavioral effects of quadrivalent HPV vaccination in men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[35]  Fontenot HB, Fantasia HC, Vetters R, Zimet GD. Increasing HPV vaccination and eliminating barriers: recommendations from young men who have sex with men. Vaccine 2016; 34 6209–16.
Increasing HPV vaccination and eliminating barriers: recommendations from young men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[36]  Burla L, Knierim B, Barth J, Liewald K, Duetz M, Abel T. From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nurs Res 2008; 57 113–7.
From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Everitt BS. Making sense of statistics in psychology: a second-level course. Oxford, UK. Oxford University Press; 1996.

[38]  Fylan F. Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women’s attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour. Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48 1509–14. http://bjgp.org/content/48/433/1509

[39]  Chang GJ, Berry J, Jay N, Palefsky J, Welton M. Surgical treatment of high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45 453–8.
Surgical treatment of high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[40]  French RS, Bonell C, Wellings K, Weatherburn P. An exploratory review of HIV prevention mass media campaigns targeting men who have sex with men. BMC Public Health 2014; 14 616–32.
An exploratory review of HIV prevention mass media campaigns targeting men who have sex with men.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |