Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective

Articles citing this paper

What qualities of long-acting reversible contraception do women perceive as desirable or undesirable? A systematic review

Jacqueline Coombe A B , Melissa L. Harris A and Deborah Loxton A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: jacqueline.coombe@uon.edu.au

Sexual Health 13(5) 404-419 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH15189
Submitted: 24 September 2015  Accepted: 22 May 2016   Published: 29 July 2016



26 articles found in Crossref database.

More Than a Physical Burden: Women’s Mental and Emotional Work in Preventing Pregnancy
Kimport Katrina
The Journal of Sex Research. 2018 55(9). p.1096
Contraception values and preferences: protocol and methods for a global systematic review
Kennedy Caitlin E., Yeh Ping Teresa, Gaffield Mary E.
Contraception. 2020 101(2). p.69
Access to contraception: A nonprofit’s community strategy
Sagrestano Lynda M., Clay Joy, Finerman Ruthbeth, Madjlesi Amy F., Gettings Nikole, Ashby Sydney
Women's Reproductive Health. 2019 6(3). p.166
The preferences of women in Australia for the features of long-acting reversible contraception: results of a discrete choice experiment
Haas Marion, Church Jody, Street Deborah J., Bateson Deborah, Fisher Jane, Taft Angela, Black Kirsten I., Lucke Jayne, Hussainy Safeera Y., McGeechan Kevin, Norman Wendy, Mazza Danielle
The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2022 27(5). p.424
“I think maybe 10 years seems a bit long.” Beliefs and attitudes of women who had never used intrauterine contraception
Walker Susan, Newton Victoria Louise, Hoggart Lesley, Parker Michael
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. 2018 44(2). p.90
Women's experiences of more than one termination of pregnancy within two years: a mixed‐methods study
Purcell C, Riddell J, Brown A, Cameron ST, Melville C, Flett G, Bhushan Y, McDaid L
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2017 124(13). p.1983
Long‐acting reversible contraception: conflicting perspectives of advocates and potential users
Rowlands S, Ingham R
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2017 124(10). p.1474
There might be blood: a scoping review on women’s responses to contraceptive-induced menstrual bleeding changes
Polis Chelsea B., Hussain Rubina, Berry Amanda
Reproductive Health. 2018 15(1).
Factors influencing contraceptive use or non-use among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
Coombe Jacqueline, Anderson Amy E., Townsend Natalie, Rae Kym M., Gilbert Stephanie, Keogh Lyniece, Corby Christine, Loxton Deborah
Reproductive Health. 2020 17(1).
Association between young women’s physical and mental health and their method of contraception in a longitudinal, population-based study
Rowlands Ingrid J, Mishra Gita D, Lucke Jayne C
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. 2021 47(2). p.129
Weight change among women using intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device, or a levonorgestrel implant for contraception did not influence early discontinuation
Bahamondes Luis
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 34 p.100857
Googling long‐acting reversible contraception: A scoping review examining the information available online about intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants
Caddy Cassandra, Coombe Jacqueline
Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 2023
A qualitative exploration of perceptions and experiences of contraceptive use, abortion and post-abortion family planning services (PAFP) in three provinces in China
Che Yan, Dusabe-Richards Esther, Wu Shangchun, Jiang Yi, Dong Xiaojing, Li Jian, Zhang Wei-Hong, Temmerman Marleen, Tolhurst Rachel
BMC Women's Health. 2017 17(1).
Side Effects and Health Benefits of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
Dianat Shokoufeh, Fox Edith, Ahrens Katherine A., Upadhyay Ushma D., Zlidar Vera M., Gallo Maria F., Stidd Reva L., Moskosky Susan, Dehlendorf Christine
Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019 133(2). p.332
How young Australian women explain their use of condoms, withdrawal and fertility awareness: a qualitative analysis of free-text comments from the CUPID study
Coombe Jacqueline, Wigginton Britta, Loxton Deborah, Lucke Jayne, Harris Melissa L.
Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2022 24(11). p.1563
Who uses long-acting reversible contraception? Profile of LARC users in the CUPID cohort
Coombe Jacqueline, Harris Melissa L., Loxton Deborah
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 2017 11 p.19
Promoting the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives to reduce unplanned pregnancies
Jones Emma Louise
Primary Health Care. 2024 34(2). p.29
Examining long-acting reversible contraception non-use among Australian women in their 20s: findings from a qualitative study
Coombe Jacqueline, Harris Melissa. L., Loxton Deborah
Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2019 21(7). p.822
Contraceptive use and contraceptive counselling interventions for women of reproductive age with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Harris Melissa L., Feyissa Tesfaye R., Bowden Nikola A., Gemzell-Danielsson Kristina, Loxton Deborah
BMC Medicine. 2022 20(1).
Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review
Yeh Ping Teresa, Kautsar Hunied, Kennedy Caitlin E, Gaffield Mary E
Contraception. 2022 111 p.3
Contextualizing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception in Delaware
Berndt Virginia Kuulei, Bell Ann V.
Contraception. 2021 103(6). p.439
A multicenter randomized clinical trial of etonogestrel and levonorgestrel contraceptive implants with nonrandomized copper intrauterine device controls: effect on weight variations up to 3 years after placement
Bahamondes Luis, Brache Vivian, Ali Moazzam, Habib Ndema
Contraception. 2018 98(3). p.181
Not seeking yet trying long-acting reversible contraception: a 24-month randomized trial on continuation, unintended pregnancy and satisfaction
Hubacher David, Spector Hannah, Monteith Charles, Chen Pai-Lien
Contraception. 2018 97(6). p.524
Introducing Long-Acting Contraceptive Removal Indicators in a Pilot Study in Mozambique: Dynamics of Discontinuation and Implications for Quality of Care
Jacinto Ana, Ronda Adalgisa Viola, Lee Connie, Fikree Fariyal F., Ramirez-Ferrero Eric
Global Health: Science and Practice. 2022 10(1). p.e2100252
Barriers to Reproductive Healthcare for Women With Opioid Use Disorder
Smith Carleigh, Morse Elizabeth, Busby Steven
Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing. 2019 33(2). p.E3
Factors influencing contraception choice and use globally: a synthesis of systematic reviews
D’Souza Preethy, Bailey Julia V., Stephenson Judith, Oliver Sandy
The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2022 27(5). p.364

Committee on Publication Ethics


Abstract Supplementary MaterialSupplementary Material (31 KB) Export Citation Get Permission