Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Clinical significance of questionnaire-elicited or clinically reported anorectal symptoms for rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis amongst men who have sex with men

Nichole A. Lister A , Nadia J. Chaves B , Chee W. Pang C , Anthony Smith C and Christopher K. Fairley A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Public Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Carlton, Vic. 3053, Australia.

B Infectious Diseases Department, Austin Health, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.

C Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: cfairley@unimelb.edu.au

Sexual Health 5(1) 77-82 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH07068
Submitted: 31 August 2007  Accepted: 30 January 2008   Published: 22 February 2008

Abstract

Background: Although Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Ng) and Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) are common infections in men who have sex with men, it is unclear from previous studies whether anorectal symptoms are reliable clinical indicators of infection. Aim: The objective of the study was to investigate the clinical significance of questionnaire-elicited or clinically reported anal symptoms for rectal Ng and Ct. Methods: During 2002 to 2003, men who have sex with men (MSM) screened or tested for Ng or Ct according to the national guidelines were invited to participate in a questionnaire. Results: During the study period, 366 MSM were enrolled into the study (88% recruitment rate), of whom 20 (5%) and 25 (7%) were diagnosed with rectal Ng or Ct, respectively. Overall, ‘any’ anorectal symptoms on a questionnaire were reported equally by those with and without rectal Ng (75 v. 74%, P = 0.69), but heavy anal discharge (P < 0.01) and anal pain (P = 0.04) were more common in those with rectal Ng. Symptoms on the questionnaire were not different among those with and without Ct. Any anal symptoms were reported substantially more often via questionnaire than in a clinical consultation (75 v. 16%, P < 0.01) and symptoms reported in a clinical consultation were not associated with Ng or Ct detection. Conclusion: The weak or absent association between symptoms and the presence of Ct or Ng highlights the importance of annual sexually transmitted infection screening in MSM regardless of symptoms.

Additional keyword: screening.


References


[1] Donovan B,  Bodsworth NJ,  Rohrsheim R,  McNulty A,  Tapsall JW. Characteristics of homosexually active men with gonorrhoea during an epidemic in Sydney, Australia. Int J STD AIDS 2001; 12 437–43.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | [verified 8 January].

[11] Sexually Transmitted Infections in Gay Men Action Group. Sexually transmitted infection guidelines for men who have sex with men. Sydney: Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine; 2005. Available online at: http://www.racp.edu.au/index.cfm?objectid=1F341D23-9A87-24D0-BD2364ED00196B11 [verified 8 January 2008].

[12] Lister NA,  Smith A,  Read T,  Fairley CK. Introduction of screening guidelines for men who have sex with men at an STD clinic, the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Australia. Sex Health 2005; 2 241–4.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[13] Mark KE,  Gunn RA. Estimating epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of reported cases using a sample survey methodology. Sex Transm Dis 2004; 31 215–20.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[14] Lafferty WE,  Hughes JP,  Hansfiled HH. Sexually transmitted diseases in men who have sex with men. Acquisition of gonorrhea and nongonococcal urethritis by fellatio and implications for STD/HIV prevention. Sex Transm Dis 1997; 24 272–8.
PubMed |

[15] Hocking J,  Fairley CK. Need for screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Australia. Aust NZ J Publ Health 2003; 27 80–1.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16] Ciemins E,  Flood J,  Kent CK,  Shaw H,  Rowniak S,  Moncada J, et al. Reexamining the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among gay men with urethritis: implications for STD policy and HIV prevention activities. Sex Transm Dis 2000; 27 249–51.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[17] Fenton KA,  Korovessis C,  Johnson AM,  McCadden A,  McManus S,  Wellings K. Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Lancet 2001; 358 1851–4.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[18] Turner CF,  Rogers SM,  Miller HG,  Gribble JN,  Chromy JR,  Leone PA, et al. Untreated gonococcal and chlamydial infection in a probability sample of Baltimore adults. JAMA 2002; 287 726–33.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[19] Anderson JE,  Stall R. Increased reporting of male-to-male sexual activity in a national survey. Sex Transm Dis 2002; 29 643–6.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |