Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > SH > SH10025
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 8(1)

‘If your husband calls, you have to go’: understanding sexual agency among young married women in urban South India

Rohini Prabha Pande A G , Tina Y. Falle B , Sujit Rathod C , Jeffrey Edmeades D and Suneeta Krishnan E F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A 7118 Willow Avenue, Takoma Park, MD 20912, USA.

B Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), PO Box 3297, Code 1250, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

C Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-Berkeley, School of Public Health, 101 Haviland Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

D International Center for Research on Women (ICRW), 1120 20th Street NW, Ste. 500 N, Washington, DC 20036, USA.

E Women’s Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 114 Sansome Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94104, USA.

F Centre for Public Policy, Indian Institute of Management Bengaluru, Bannerghatta Road, Bilekahalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560076, India.

G Corresponding author. Email: rohinipande@jhu.edu

Sexual Health 8(1) 102-109 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH10025
Submitted: 27 February 2010  Accepted: 20 July 2010   Published: 24 January 2011

Abstract

Background: Early marriage is common in many developing countries, including India. Women who marry early have little power within their marriage, particularly in the sexual domain. Research is limited on women’s ability to control their marital sexual experiences. Methods: We identified factors affecting sexual communication among married women aged 16–25, in Bangalore, India, and how factors associated with sexual communication differed from those influencing non-sexual agency. We ran ordered logit regression models for one outcome of sexual agency (sexual communication, n = 735) and two outcomes of non-sexual agency (fertility control, n = 735, and financial decision-making, n = 728). Results: Sexual communication was more restricted (83 women (11.3%) with high sexual communication) than financial decision-making (183 women (25.1%) with high financial decision-making agency) and fertility control (238 women (32.4%) with high fertility control). Feeling prepared before the first sexual experience was significantly associated with sexual communication (odds ratio (OR) = 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.13–2.89). Longer marriage duration (OR 2.13; 95% CI = 1.42–3.20) and having worked pre-marriage (OR 1.38; 95% CI = 1.02–1.86) were also significant. Few other measures of women’s resources increased their odds of sexual communication. Education, having children, pre-marital vocational training and marital intimacy were significant for non-sexual outcomes but not sexual communication. Conclusions: Policy-makers seeking to enhance young married women’s sexual communication need to consider providing sex education to young women before they marry. More broadly, interventions designed to increase women’s agency need to be tailored to the type of agency being examined.

Additional keywords: communication, sex education, women’s empowerment.


Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Samraksha and in particular Sanghamitra Iyengaar, for the support and insights provided during the early years of this study; to the Samata Health Study team for their dedication and effort; and to Kalyani Subbiah for her diligence in directing the project. We thank Anju Malhotra, Anne Golla, Margaret Greene, Corinne Rocca and Kalyani Subbiah for their insights and feedback on this manuscript. The project was supported by award R01HD041731 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.


References


[1] Jain S , Kurz K . New insights on preventing child marriage: a global analysis of factors and programs. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women; 2007.

[2] International Institute for Population Sciences. National family health survey (NFHS-3), India 2005–06. Mumbai: IIPS, Macro International; 2007.

[3] International Institute for Population Sciences. Youth in India, situation and needs 2006–2007: Fact sheet Maharastra. Mumbai: IIPS, Population Council; 2007.

[4] Jejeebhoy SJ , Bott S . Non-consensual sexual experiences of young people in developing countries. In: Jejeebhoy SJ, Shah I, Thapa S, editors. Sex without consent: young people in developing countries. New York: Zed Books; 2005. pp. 3–45.

[5] Santhya KG,  Haberland N,  Ram F,  Sinha RK,  Mohanty SK. Consent and coercion: examining unwanted sex among married young women in India. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2007; 33 124–32.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[6] Jensen R,  Thornton R. Early female marriage in the developing world. Gend Dev 2003; 11 9–19.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[7] Pande RP , Kurz K , Walia S , MacQuarrie K , Jain S . Improving the reproductive health of married and unmarried youth in India: evidence of effectiveness and costs from community-based interventions. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women; 2006.

[8] Santhya KG , Jejeebhoy SJ . Young women’s experiences of forced sex within marriage: evidence from India. In: Jejeebhoy SJ, Shah I, Thapa S, editors. Sex without consent: young people in developing countries. New York: Zed Books; 2005. pp. 59–74.

[9] Measham D . Gender-based power and susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections in Karnataka State, India. Berkeley: University of California; 2004.

[10] Narayan KA,  Srinivasa DK,  Pelto PJ,  Veerammal S. Puberty rituals, reproductive knowledge and health of adolescent schoolgirls in South India. Asia Pac Popul J 2001; 16 225–38.


[11] Go VF,  Sethulakshmi CJ,  Bentley ME,  Sivaram S,  Srikrishnan AK,  Solomon S, et al. When HIV-prevention messages and gender norms clash: the impact of domestic violence on women’s HIV risk in slums of Chennai, India. AIDS Behav 2003; 7 263–72.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[12] Joshi A,  Dhapola M,  Kurian E,  Pelto PJ. Experiences and perceptions of marital sexual relationships among rural women in Gujarat, India. Asia Pac Popul J 2001; 16 177–94.


[13] Khan ME,  Townsend JW,  D’Costa S. Behind closed doors: a qualitative study of sexual behaviour of married women in Bangladesh. Cult Health Sex 2002; 4 237–56.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14] George A . Newly married adolescent women: experiences from case studies in urban India. In: Bott S, Jejeebhoy SD, Shah I, Puri C, editors. Towards adulthood: exploring the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents in South Asia. Geneva: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization (WHO); 2003. pp. 67–70.

[15] Maitra S,  Schensul SL. Reflecting diversity and complexity in marital sexual relationships in a low-income community in Mumbai. Cult Health Sex 2002; 4 133–51.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16] Ravindran STK,  Balasubramanian P. “Yes” to abortion but “no” to sexual rights: the paradoxical reality of married women in rural Tamil Nadu, India. Reprod Health Matters 2004; 12 88–99.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[17] Ghosh J,  Wadhwa V,  Kalipeni E. Vulnerability to HIV/AIDS among women of reproductive age in the slums of Delhi and Hyderabad, India. Soc Sci Med 2009; 68 638–42.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[18] Erulkar AS. The experience of sexual coercion among young people in Kenya. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2004; 30 182–9.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[19] Koenig MA,  Zablotska I,  Lutalo T,  Nalugoda F,  Wagman J,  Gray R. Coerced first intercourse and reproductive health among adolescent women in Rakai, Uganda. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2004; 30 156–63.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[20] National AIDS Control Organization. National behavioural surveillance survey (BSS) 2006: youth. New Delhi: NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, National Institute of Medical Statistics; 2008.

[21] Kabeer N. Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Dev Change 1999; 30 435–64.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22] Malhotra A , Schuler SR . Women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. In: Narayan D, editor. Measuring empowerment: cross-disciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2005. pp. 71–88.

[23] Kishor S . Women’s contraceptive use in Egypt: what do direct measures of empowerment tell us? Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America; 2000 March 23–25; Los Angeles, California.

[24] Pulerwitz J,  Gortmaker S,  DeJong W. Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles 2000; 42 637–60.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[25] Crosby RA,  DiClemente RJ,  Wingood GM,  Salazar LF,  Head S,  Rose E, et al. Sexual agency versus relational factors: a study of condom use antecedents among high-risk young African-American women. Sex Health 2008; 5 41–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[26] Wolff B,  Blanc AK,  Gage AJ. Who decides? Women’s status and negotiations of sex in Uganda. Cult Health Sex 2000; 2 303–22.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27] Blanc AK. The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: an examination of the evidence. Stud Fam Plann 2001; 32 189–213.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[28] Koenig MA , Jejeebhoy SJ , Cleland JC , Ganatra B . Reproductive health in India: new evidence. Jaipur: Rawat Publications; 2008.

[29] Marston C. Gendered communication among young people in Mexico: implications for sexual health interventions. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59 445–56.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[30] Noland CM. Listening to the sound of silence: gender roles and communication about sex in Puerto Rico. Sex Roles 2006; 55 283–94.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[31] Beegle K,  Frankenberg E,  Thomas D. Bargaining power within couples and use of prenatal and delivery care in Indonesia. Stud Fam Plann 2001; 32 130–46.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[32] Krishnan S,  Rocca CH,  Hubbard AE,  Subbiah K,  Edmeades J,  Padian NS. Do changes in spousal employment status lead to domestic violence? Insights from a prospective study in Bangalore, India. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70 136–43.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[33] Rocca CH,  Rathod S,  Falle T,  Pande RP,  Krishnan S. Challenging assumptions about women’s empowerment: social and economic resources and domestic violence among young married women in urban South India. Int J Epidemiol 2008; 38 577–85.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |

[34] Krishnan S , Pande R , Mathur S , Subbiah K , Roca E , Measham D et al . Marriage and motherhood: influences on urban Indian women’s power in sexual relationships. Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America; March 31–April 2 2005; Philadelphia.

[35] Guest P . Researching designs for investigating non-consensual sexual experiences among young people. In: Jejeebhoy SJ, Shah I, Thapa S, editors. Sex without consent: young people in developing countries. New York: Zed Books; 2005. pp. 301–17.

[36] McCullagh P , Nelder JA . Generalized linear models. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.

[37] Mason KO,  Smith HL. Husbands’ versus wives’ fertility goals and use of contraception: the influence of gender context in five Asian countries. Demography 2000; 37 299–311.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[38] Barua A,  Kurz K. Reproductive health-seeking by married adolescent girls in Maharashtra, India. Reprod Health Matters 2001; 9 53–62.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[39] Barua A,  Pande RP,  MacQuarrie K,  Walia S. Caring men? Husbands’ involvement in the maternal care of their young wives. Econ Polit Wkly 2004; 39 5661–8.


[40] Bloom SS,  Wypij D,  Das Gupta M. Dimensions of women’s autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a North Indian city. Demography 2001; 38 67–78.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed |

[41] Hindin MJ. Women’s autonomy, women’s status and fertility-related behavior in Zimbabwe. Popul Res Policy Rev 2000; 19 255–82.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[42] Niraula BB , Morgan SP . Gender inequality in two Nepali settings. In: Garcia B, editor. Women, poverty, and demographic change. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 42–72.

[43] Marston C . Pitfalls in the study of sexual coercion: what are we measuring and why? In: S. Jejeebhoy S, Shah I, Thapa S, editors. Sex without consent: young people in developing countries. New York: Zed Books; 2005. pp. 287–300.