
%0 Journal Article
%A Loch, RJ 
%T Using rill/interrill comparisons to infer likely responses of erosion to slope length: implications for land management
%J Soil Research
%D 1996/08/01
%V 34
%N 4
%P 489-502
%K erosion, rilling, interrill erosion, erosion control.
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9960489
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/SR9960489 
%X With the release of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) there is potential to consider a range of responses of erosion to increasing slope length. This paper presents data to illustrate commonly observed effects of increasing overland flow on erosion processes and erosion rates, and considers the application of the data to specifying land management strategies and forms of vegetative cover most suited to particular soils. It also discusses a methodology for assessing relevant slope length factors for the RUSLE based on rill/interrill susceptibility. Three basic responses to slope length are noted: (i) little increase in erosion per unit area with increasing length, due to either the failure of rills to develop for the range of overland flows considered, or rill formation at very low hows with no further increase in erosion rates as flow rates increase; (ii) moderate increase in erosion per unit area with slope length associated with slight rill development; and (iii) large increases in erosion per unit area with slope length as rilling develops strongly. These responses have significance for the relative importance of surface and contact cover (and therefore, for the plant species grown and/or residue management strategy adopted), and for the use of contour banks to reduce slope length. 
