Assessment of the application of percolation theory to a water repellent soil
Tammo S. Steenhuis A D , Allen G. Hunt B , J.-Yves Parlange A and Robert P. Ewing CA Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Riley-Robb Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
B Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
C Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: TSS1@cornell.edu
Australian Journal of Soil Research 43(3) 357-360 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR04093
Submitted: 25 June 2004 Accepted: 7 January 2005 Published: 25 May 2005
Abstract
A few hydrophobic grains in otherwise hydrophilic sand render the soil hydrophobic and can completely alter the flow of water through unsaturated sands. In this paper we examine whether percolation theory can explain the phenomenon. Percolation theory has been used to describe the dependence of large-scale flow phenomena on heterogeneities found at the pore scale and should, therefore, be able to explain the water flow behaviour in hydrophobic soil. We show that the theory is valid, in general, for a hydrophilic soil into which a small but increasing fraction of highly hydrophobic grains is mixed. However, the application of percolation theory is limited by the complex interactions of matric potential and contact angle effects due to the introduction of hydrophobic particles.
Bauters TWJ,
DiCarlo DA,
Steenhuis TS, Parlange J-Y
(1998) Preferential flow in water-repellent sands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62, 1185–1190.
Berkowitz B, Ewing RP
(1998) Percolation theory and network modeling applications in soil physics. Surveys in Geophysics 19, 23–72.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bisdom EBA,
Dekker LW, Schoute JFTh
(1993) Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma 56, 105–118.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blunt MJ
(2001) Flow in porous media—pore network models and multiphase flow. Current Opinion in Colloid Interface Science 6, 197–207.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bradford SA, Leij FJ
(1996) Predicting two- and three-fluid capillary pressure-saturation relationships of porous media with fractional wettability. Water Resources Research 32, 251–260.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Crist JT,
McCarthy JF,
Zevi Y,
Baveye P,
Throop JA, Steenhuis TS
(2004) Pore-scale visualization of colloid transport and retention in partly saturated porous media. Vadose Zone Journal 3, 444–450.
DiCarlo DA,
Sahni A, Blunt MJ
(2000) The effect of wettability on three-phase relative permeability. Transport in Porous Media 39, 347–366.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunt AG
(2001) Application of percolation theory to porous media with distributed local conditions. Advances in Water Resources 24, 279–307.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hunt AG, Gee GW
(2002) Water retention of fractal soil models using continuum percolation theory tests of Hanford site soils. Vadose Zone Journal 1, 252–260.
Pike GE, Seager CH
(1974) Percolation and conductivity – computer study 1. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 10, 1421–1434.
Raikh ME, Ruzin IM
(1990) Size effect in the longitudinal hopping conduction of a narrow 2-dimensional channel. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 42, 11 203–11 207.
Ritsema CJ, Dekker LW
(1996) Water repellency and its role in forming preferred flow paths in soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 34, 475–487.
| Crossref |
Seager CH, Pike GE
(1974) Percolation and conductivity – computer study 2. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 10, 1435–1446.
Simms PH, Yanful EK
(2002) Predicting soil-water characteristic curves of compacted plastic soils from measured pore-size distributions. Geotechnique 52, 269–278.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stauffer D
(1979) Scaling theory of percolation clusters. Physics Reports 54, 1–74.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
