CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

Affiliated Societies

RFD is the official journal of the International Embryo Transfer Society and the Society for Reproductive Biology.



Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 17(2)

88 PREGNANCY RATES FOR IN VITRO AND IN VIVO PRODUCED OVINE EMBRYOS VITRIFIED USING THE MINIMUM VOLUME COOLING CRYOTOP METHOD

J. Kelly A, D. Kleemann A, M. Kuwayama B and S. Walker A

A South Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, Australia
B Kato Ladies' Clinic, Tokyo, Japan. Email: kelly.jen@saugov.sa.gov.au
   

Abstract
PDF
(243 KB)
Export Citation
Print
  


Abstract

Previously we reported that, using the minimum volume cooling (MVC) cryotop vitrification method, in vitro-produced ovine and bovine embryo survival after thawing was similiar to that of fresh embryos (Kelly et al. 2004 Reprod. Fert. Dev. 16, 172). While survival of vitrified embryos after thawing can be indicative of embryo viability, this assessment does not always correlate with embryo survival after transfer. This study assesses the effect of vitrification using the MVC cryotop method on the survival after transfer of in vitro- and in vivo-produced ovine embryos. Fresh or vitrified Day 6 ovine embryos (expanded blastocysts, blastocysts, compact morulae) were used in this study. Ovine cumulus–oocyte complexes were obtained and matured, fertilized (Day 0), and cultured in vitro (Walker et al. 1996 Biol. Reprod. 55, 703–708). In vitro embryos for vitrification were produced and vitrified (Kelly et al. 2004 Reprod. Fert. Dev. 16, 172) 10 days prior to the day of transfer. In vivo embryos were recovered from donor Merino ewes and vitrified 7 days prior to the day of transfer while fresh in vivo embryos were collected and transferred on the same day. Semen used for both in vivo and in vitro embryo production was from the same sire. On the day of transfer, vitrified embryos were thawed directly into 1.25 M sucrose solution, followed by stepwise dilution of the cryoprotectants. Embryos were transferred as singles into synchronized recipient ewes on a randomized basis. Fetal number was detected at Day 50. Variables were assessed using the CATMOD procedure in SAS. Pregnancy rate for in vivo-derived embryos was higher (P < 0.01) than for in vitro-derived embryos. Embryo treatment (fresh vs. vitrified) did not significantly affect pregnancy rate. Pregnancy rate for ewes detected (by vasectomized rams) in estrus within 48 h of progesterone pessary removal was higher (P < 0.05) than for both the 48–68 h and unmarked groups. The latter two groups did not differ significantly. None of the first-order interactions were significant (P > 0.05). This study demonstrates that ovine embryos (in vitro and in vivo) can be vitrified, thawed, and transferred without compromising embryo viability. However, the differences in pregnancy rate between the recipient groups warrant further investigation. The MVC cryotop method is a vitrification technique that can be adapted to routine field use.

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 17(896) 194–194   http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RDv17n2Ab88
Submitted: 1 August 2004    Accepted: 1 October 2004    Published online: 01 January 2005




 
Top  Email this page
 
   


Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013