CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

Affiliated Societies

RFD is the official journal of the International Embryo Transfer Society and the Society for Reproductive Biology.



Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 21(1)

28 SIMPLIFIED ACTIVATION METHOD TO IMPROVE THE IN VITRO DEVELOPMENT OF HANDMADE CLONED (HMC) PORCINE EMBRYOS

Y. Du A, Z. Yang A, B. Lv A, L. Lin B, P. M. Kragh B, X. Zhang A, G. Vajta C, H. Yang A and L. Bolund A B

A Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen, China;
B Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark;
C PIVET Medical Centre, Perth, Australia
   

Abstract
Export Citation
Print
  


Abstract

Delayed activation is commonly used in pig somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) where electrical activation is followed by chemical activation. However, chemical incubation of several hours (up to 4 or 6) is logistically not very convenient even though handmade cloning (HMC) could improve the overall efficiency of pig cloning (Du et al. 2007 Theriogenology 68, 1104–1110). It was reported that a brief exposure of cycloheximide (CX) before electrical activation could significantly increase developmental rate and total blastocyst cell number when simultaneous activation was performed in micromanipulator-based pig cloning (Naruse et al. 2007 Theriogenology 68, 709–716). The purpose of our present work is to investigate whether such activation method is also applicable for pig HMC. Data were analyzed by t-test using SPSS (11.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). After 42 h in vitro maturation, cumulus cells were removed. In vitro-cultured porcine fetal fibroblasts were used as donor cells. Cytoplast-fibroblast pairing, electrical fusion and activation of fused cytoplast-fibroblast pairs were performed as described previously (Kragh et al. 2005 Theriogenology 64, 1536–1545; Du et al. 2005 Cloning Stem Cells 7, 199–205). Three groups were compared due to different activation protocol. In Group 1 (control), reconstructed embryos were cultured in porcine zygote medium 3 (PZM3) supplemented with 4 mg mL–1 BSA, 5 μg mL–1 cytochalasin B (CB), and 10 μg mL–1 CX for 4 h. In Group 2 (CX priming), fused pairs and the other halves of cytoplasts were incubated in HEPES-buffered TCM-199 medium supplemented with 10% calf serum, 10 μg mL–1 CX for 10 min just before the second fusion or electrical activation. In Group 3 (CB + CX priming), treatment similar to Group 2 was performed except that additional 5 μg mL–1 CB was added for the 10-min incubation. Reconstructed embryos were in vitro cultured in the well of the well (WOW) system for 6 days. Blastocyst rates and total cell numbers of Day 6 blastocysts were evaluated. As illustrated in Table 1, embryos pretreated with both CB and CX gave the best results, with better blastocyst formation (53.8 ± 4.8%; mean ± SEM) and higher cell number (77.2 ± 5.4) compared to the other 2 groups. Our data suggested that CX and CB priming could be used as a solution to the long chemical incubation in porcine SCNT by HMC, making the embryos more receptive to electrical activation.

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 21(4842) 114–115   http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RDv21n1Ab28
Published online: 09 December 2008




 
Top  Email this page
 
   


Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013