CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Virtual Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
Awards and Prizes
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
Library Recommendation

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn

red arrow Connect with SRB
blank image
facebook TwitterIcon

Affiliated Societies

RFD is the official journal of the International Embryo Transfer Society and the Society for Reproductive Biology.

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 22(1)


C. I. Casaretto A, D. Lombardo A, S. Giuliano A, M. Gambarotta B, M. I. Carretero A, V. L. Trasorras A and M. H. Miragaya A

A Instituto de Investigación y Tecnología en Reproducción Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina;
B Área de Elementos de Estadística, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Export Citation


During the last decades, the interest in breeding South American Camelids has increased, not only as companion animals but also for their high- quality fiber. Although several studies have been carried out on artificial insemination in Lama glama, this technique has not been widely applied in reproductive programs, principally due to the difficulty in collecting raw semen from males and the lack of knowledge about freezing/thawing techniques and semen characteristics. The aim of the present study was to objectively characterize llama sperm morphometry by a computer-assisted system, thereby increasing the knowledge on male llama physiology, leading to further developement of reproductive biotechnologies such as artificial insemination. Five semen samples were obtained by electroejaculation from each of 8 males, 6- to 10-year-old llamas of proven fertility. Smears were prepared from each sample and stained with Tinción 15® (Biopur S.R.L., Rosario, Argentina) and observed at x 1000 magnification. Images of sperm heads were captured by a Leica DC180 camera (Leica Microsystems Co., Wetzlar, Germany), obtaining 200 images from each sample. Binary images were obtained and area, length, width, equivalent circle diameter, curve length, curve width, perimeter, convex perimeter, roundness, and elongation were measured using QWin Plus (Leica Microsystems Co.). A total of 8005 sperm heads were measured. Descriptive statistics of the complete population was performed, with the following results obtained (mean ± SD): area (μm2) 20.09 ± 0.6, length (μm) 6.6 ± 0.3, width (μm) 4.14 ± 0.1, equivalent diameter ((μm) 5.06 ± 0.1, curve length (μm) 5.8 ± 0.3, curve width (μm) 3.48 ± 0.3, perimeter (μm) 18.54 ± 0.1, convex perimeter (μm) 17.34 ± 0.3, roundness 1.28 ± 0.04, and elongation 1.6 ± 0.01. Coefficients of variation were between 0.47 and 8.72%. A design considering the male as a fixed factor and the ejaculate as a nested factor was used for the purpose of identifying differences in morphometry between ejaculates of the same male and/or between males. Normality was tested using the Kolmogorov test. Significant differences between ejaculates of some males were found for curve length, curve width, perimeter, roundness, and elongation (P < 0.05). There were no intra-male differences for sperm head area, length, width, equivalent circle diameter, and convex perimeter. Of the parameters, there were significant differences between males for sperm area, length, equivalent circle diameter, and convex perimeter (P < 0.05). The differences found in sperm morphometry confirm the great polymorphism observed when subjectively evaluating llama semen morphology and make the establishment of a single pattern of normal llama sperm morphometry impossible.

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 22(5305) 310–311   http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RDv22n1Ab309
Published online: 08 December 2009

Top  Email this page

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2016