CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter youtube

red arrow Connect with SRB
blank image
facebook TwitterIcon

Affiliated Societies

RFD is the official journal of the International Embryo Transfer Society and the Society for Reproductive Biology.



Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 22(1)

323 POSSIBLE BENEFICIAL EFFECT OF REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES ON BOAR SPERM FUNCTION

C. H. C. Viana A, M. Nichi B, R. O. C. Silva B, E. G. A. Perez B, R. N. Garcia A, P. F. Lima A, R. P. Cabral A, D. G. Silva A, Â. C. Teodoro A, V. H. Barnabe B and R. C. Barnabe B

A Pontifícia Universidade Católica, Poços de Caldas, MG, Brazil;
B Department of Animal Reproduction, FMVZ-USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
   

Abstract
Export Citation
Print
  


Abstract

Boar spermatozoa are sensitive to the attack of reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to the high content of unsaturated fatty acids in its plasma membrane and the relative low antioxidant capacity of boar seminal plasma. The benefical effect of antioxidant supplementation to the semen of boars is still a matter of debate, with different results in the literature, probably due to the empirical methods used to determine the more adequate antioxidant, and to the physiological role or the ROS. The aim of the present experiment was to study which ROS is the most deleterious to the boar sperm. Sperm samples from 4 boars were collected by digital manipulation. Sperm samples were then incubated (1 h, 37°C) with 4 ROS inducer mechanisms: xanthine/xanthine oxidase (produces superoxide anion), hydrogen peroxide (4 mM), ascorbate/ferrous sulfate (4 mM; produced hydroxyl radical), and malondialdehyde (lipid peroxidation product). Samples were analyzed for the 3-3′ diaminobenzidine stain, as an index of mitochondrial activity; the eosin/nigrosin staining, as an index of membrane integrity; the simple stain (fast green/Bengal rose), as an index of acrosome integrity; and the measurement of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), as an index of lipid peroxidation. Results showed that the boar sperm is relatively resistant to all ROS studied in the present experiment. Only for the percentage of sperm showing intact membrane, a difference was found between incubation with superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical (Table 1). The TBARS production was higher in samples incubated with hydroxyl radical, indicating that these samples were more susceptible to the attack of this ROS. Surprisingly, a positive correlation was found between TBARS and membrane integrity (r = 0.51, P = 0.04), indicating that samples more susceptible to the oxidative stress showed higher membrane integrity. A hypothesis to explain such conflicting results would be the physiological role of the ROS on several spermatic events, especially in this particular species. It is well known that boar semen, in order to achieve ideal motility, requires aerobic conditions. Further studies are necessary to study the effect of each ROS on each physiological or pathological event on boar sperm function.


The authors thank Nutricell for the media used in the present experiment.

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 22(5305) 317–318   http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RDv22n1Ab323
Published online: 08 December 2009




 
Top  Email this page
 
   


Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2014