CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
blank image Search
blank image blank image
blank image
  Advanced Search

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Virtual Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Submit Article
Author Instructions
Open Access
Awards and Prizes
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates
Library Recommendation

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter logo LinkedIn

red arrow Connect with SRB
blank image
facebook TwitterIcon

Affiliated Societies

RFD is the official journal of the International Embryo Transfer Society and the Society for Reproductive Biology.

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 22(1)


D. Carballo Guerrero A, A. Tríbulo A, R. Tríbulo A, H. Tríbulo A and G. A. A

A Instituto Reproducción Animal Córdoba, Zona Rural Gral. Paz, Córdoba, Argentina;
B Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina

Export Citation
Cited by


Although we have previously shown that ovarian superstimulation during the first follicular wave resulted in a successful response (Carballo Guerrero D et al. 2009 Reprod. Fertil. 21, 242), the current protocol needs to be optimized in order to be used in the field. Therefore, an experiment was designed to simplify this treatment and to compare it with the traditional superstimulation protocol using progesterone and estradiol. Simmental cows (n = 14) were subjected to 3 superstimulation treatments (2 first wave groups and 1 control group) in a crossover design (i.e. all cows received the 3 treatments and all treatments were represented on each collection day). Cows in Group 1 received a progesterone-releasing device (Cue-Mate®, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) along with 0.150 mg of D + cloprostenol (PGF; Bioprost-D®, Biotay, Buenos Aires, Argentina) at random stages of the estrous cycle. A second PGF was injected 5 days after Cue-Mate® insertion, followed by GnRH (0.050 mg of lecirelin; Biosin-OV®, Biotay) 36 h later (i.e. 7 days after Cue-Mate® insertion). Based on previous studies, ovulation was expected to occur 30 to 36 h later. Therefore, superstimulation treatments were initiated 36 h after GnRH (Day 0), with a total dose of 400 mg NIH-FSH-P1 of Folltropin®-V (Bioniche Animal Health) in twice-daily decreasing doses over 4 days. Prostaglandin was administered with the last 2 Folltropin®-V injections and Cue-Mate® devices were removed with the last Folltropin®-V injection. Cows received 12.5 mg of porcine LH (Lutropin®-V, Bioniche Animal Health) 24 h after Cue-Mate® removal and were AI 12 and 24 h later. Ova/embryos were collected 7 days after porcine LH and evaluated following IETS recommendations. Cows in Group 2 were treated similarly to those in the Group 1, except they did not receive the second PGF injection 5 days after Cue-Mate® insertion (thus eliminating the need to handle animals on that day). Finally, cows in Group 3 [estradiol benzoate (EB)+P4 control group] received a Cue-Mate® plus 2.5 mg of EB (Bioestradiol®, Biotay) and 50 mg of progesterone (P4; Lab., Rio de Janeiro, Argentina) at random stages of their estrous cycle. Superstimulation treatments were initiated 4 days later (Day 0) following the same protocol used in Group 1. Data were transformed to square root and analyzed by ANOVA. Mean (± SEM) numbers of ova/embryos collected, fertilized ova, and transferable embryos did not differ among groups (12.9 ± 2.0, 9.8 ± 1.7, and 6.6 ± 1.2; 11.5 ± 1.7, 9.3 ± 1.5, and 7.7 ± 1.6; and 14.5 ± 2.8, 9.4 ± 2.3, and 6.8 ± 1.7 for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). In conclusion, data demonstrated that superstimulation during the first follicular wave can be successfully used in groups of randomly cycling donors without the need for estrus detection or estradiol to synchronize follicular wave emergence. The protocol is easy to follow and embryo production is comparable to that of the estradiol and progesterone protocol.

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 22(5305) 358–358   http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RDv22n1Ab404
Published online: 08 December 2009

Top  Email this page

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help


© CSIRO 1996-2016