CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review an Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook twitter youtube

red arrow Connect with SRB
blank image
facebook TwitterIcon

Affiliated Societies

RFD is the official journal of the International Embryo Transfer Society and the Society for Reproductive Biology.



Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 22(1)

422 GENERATION OF REPORTER TRANSGENIC MICE FOR THE CHEMOKINE CXCL2 USING TWO DIFFERENT DNA CONCENTRATIONS

M. Crispo A, M. Cárdenas-Rodriguez A, G. Schlapp A, G. Fernández A and M. Rumbo A

A Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Uruguay;
B Universidad Nacional de la Plata, Argentina
   

Abstract
Export Citation
Print
  


Abstract

Transgenic mice have important implications in biomedicine, and are widely employed to understand gene functions and their regulation. The improvement of transgenic efficiency is relevant because of the low rate of success for this technology. CXCL2 is a chemokine secreted by macrophages and epithelial cells under proinflammatory stimulus of the innate immune response such as bacterial endotoxins. The main effect of CXCL2 is the recruitment of neutrophils to the site of production to fight infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of 2 DNA concentrations in the efficiency of the transgenesis process. To this aim we used a luciferase reporter under the control of CXCL2 promoter for the generation of a transgenic line to report activation of innate immune response. A total of 1727 1-cell embryos were divided into 2 experimental groups to be microinjected with 0.5 or 1.0 ng μL-1 of DNA in 25 sessions. Three-week-old B6SJL F1 females (n = 131) were superovulated with 5 IU of eCG i.p. (Novormon, Syntex, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and 5 IU of hCG i.p. (Ovusyn, Syntex) 46 h later, and mated with B6SJL F1 stud males. At the moment of hCG treatment, foster females were mated with vasectomized males to induce pseudogestation. Donor females were euthanized by cervical dislocation 20 h after hCG treatment, and embryos were recovered from the ampulla, denuded in 300 μg mL-1 hyaluronidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2, in drops of M16 media (Sigma) under mineral oil, until microinjection. DNA construction consisted of the luciferase reporter gene under the control of the murine CXCL2 gene promoter. Embryos were microinjected into 1 pronucleus under an inverted microscope (Nikon, NY, USA) using glass microtools and mechanic micromanipulators (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Intact/injected embryos were assessed 30 min after microinjection. Fifteen to 20 embryos per foster female were transferred in both oviducts. Birth rate, survival of pups at Day 7 after birth, number of transgenic pups assessed by standard PCR, and overall transgenic efficiency was registered for each group. Data were analyzed by Yates-corrected chi-square test. No statistical differences were founded except for a higher number of pups alive/embryo transferred in the lower DNA concentration, suggesting the advantage of using 0.5 ng μL-1 v. 1.0 ng μL-1.

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 22(5305) 368–368   http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RDv22n1Ab422
Published online: 08 December 2009




 
Top  Email this page
 
   


Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2014