Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Large fires as agents of ecological diversity in the North American boreal forest

Philip J. Burton A E , Marc-André Parisien B C , Jeffrey A. Hicke D , Ronald J. Hall C and Jason T. Freeburn C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Canadian Forest Service and University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC, V2N 4Z9, Canada.

B Department of Environmental Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

C Canadian Forest Service, 5320–122nd St, Edmonton, AB, T6H 3S5, Canada.

D Department of Geography, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.

E Corresponding author. Email: pburton@pfc.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca

International Journal of Wildland Fire 17(6) 754-767 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07149
Submitted: 15 October 2007  Accepted: 22 October 2008   Published: 12 December 2008

Abstract

The present study undertook a hierarchical analysis of the variability within and among some individual fire events in the boreal ecozones of Canada and Alaska. When stratified by ecozone, differences in the spatial and temporal distribution of wildfires were observed in the Canadian Large Fire Data Base that reflect climatic, terrain and land-use differences across the country. Remote-sensing data collected before and after boreal forest fires permitted a rigorous analysis of the variability in burn severity within individual fire events, and the identification of certain fire-prone and more fire-resistant land-cover types. The occurrence of fire skips or islands was related to the distribution of those cover types, resulting in proportionally more unburned area within the perimeter of a burn for larger fires. Differences in burn severity led to differences in post-burn vegetation response of tree, shrub and moss layers that can persist for decades or even centuries. As a result, there can be considerable variability in the survival, density and distribution of residual biota and organic materials. This variability creates a range of post-fire vegetation patterns and contributes much to the habitat diversity of boreal landscapes.


Acknowledgements

P. J. Burton and M.-A. Parisien contributed equally to this paper. We thank Richard Williams and Ross Bradstock for inviting the current presentation at the Third International Congress of Forest Fire Science and Ecology. We appreciate the contributions of Alain Leduc and Yves Bergeron (Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue and Université du Québec à Montréal), Mike Flannigan and Sylvie Gauthier (Canadian Forest Service/Service canadien des forêts) to the oral presentation on which the present paper is based. Financial support for the burn severity assessment over selected fires within the Canadian boreal was provided by the Canadian Space Agency Government Related Initiatives Program (GRIP) program to foster the increased use of earth observation data within federal government departments. Thanks to everyone who compiled and lent us data, or assisted in secondary analysis of primary sources, including John Little and Morgan Cranny (Canadian Forest Service) and Robert Landry (Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada). Constructive comments by Brad Hawkes, Steve Glover, two anonymous reviewers and the associate editors have strengthened the paper, for which we are grateful.


References


Amiro BD, Todd JB, Wotton BM, Logan KA, Flannigan MD, Stocks BJ, Mason JA, Martell DL , Hirsch KG (2001) Direct carbon emissions from Canadian forest fires, 1959 to 1999. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  31, 512–525.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | Andison D (2006) ‘Determining Island Remnants and Meso-Scale Fire Patterns in Saskatchewan, Part 3. Event Composition and Spatial Controls.’ (Bandaloop Landscape-Ecosystem Services: Belcarra, BC)

Angelstam P (1998) Maintaining and restoring biodiversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes. Journal of Vegetation Science  9, 593–602.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Burton PJ, Adamowicz WL, Weetman GF, Messier C, Prepas E, Tittler R (2003) The state of boreal forestry and the drive for change. In ‘Towards Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest’. (Eds PJ Burton, C Messier, DW Smith, WL Adamowicz) pp. 1–40. (NRC Research Press: Ottawa, ON)

Chapin FS, Viereck LA, Adams P, Van Cleve K, Fastie CL, Ott RA, Mann D, Johnstone JF (2006) Successional processes in the Alaskan boreal forest. In ‘Alaska’s Changing Boreal Forest’. (Eds FS Chapin, MW Oswood, K Van Cleve, LA Viereck, DL Verbyla) pp. 100–120. (Oxford University Press: New York)

Charron I , Greene DF (2002) Post-wildfire seedbeds and tree establishment in the southern mixedwood boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  32, 1607–1615.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Dyrness CT, Viereck LA, Van Cleve K (1986) Fire in taiga communities of interior Alaska. In ‘Forest Ecosystems in the Alaskan Taiga’. (Eds K Van Cleve, FS Chapin, PW Flanagan, LA Viereck, CT Dyrness) pp. 74–86. (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Eberhart KE , Woodard PM (1987) Distribution of residual vegetation associated with large fires in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research  17, 1207–1212.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ecological Stratification Working Group (1995) ‘A National Ecological Framework for Canada.’ (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research and Environment Canada, State of Environment Directorate: Ottawa, ON)

Epting J, Verbyla D , Sorbel B (2005) Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+. Remote Sensing of Environment  96, 328–339.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Forestry Canada Fire Danger Group (1992) Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction System. Forestry Canada, Information Report ST-X-3. (Ottawa, ON)

Foster DR (1983) The history and pattern of fire in the boreal forest of south-eastern Labrador. Canadian Journal of Botany  61, 2459–2471.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Johnson EA (1992) ‘Fire and Vegetation Dynamics: Studies from the North American Boreal Forest.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Johnson EA, Miyanishi K , Weir JMH (1998) Wildfires in the western Canadian boreal forest: landscape patterns and ecosystem management. Journal of Vegetation Science  9, 603–610.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Key CH, Benson NC (2006) Landscape assessment: sampling and analysis methods. In ‘FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System’. (Eds DC Lutes, RE Keane, JF Caratti, CH Key, NC Benson, S Sutherland, LH Gangi) USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-164, pp. LA1–LA51. (Fort Collins, CO)

Larsen JA (1980) ‘The Boreal Ecosystem.’ (Academic Press: New York)

Lecomte N, Simard M , Bergeron Y (2006a) Effects of fire severity and initial tree composition on stand structural development in the coniferous boreal forest of north-western Québec, Canada. Ecoscience  13, 152–163.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Miyanishi K (2001) Duff consumption. In ‘Forest Fires: Behavior and Ecological Effects’. (Eds EA Johnson, K Miyanishi) pp. 437–475. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CC, da Fonseca GAB , Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature  403, 853–858.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | PubMed | Parisien MA, Hirsch KG, Lavoie SG, Todd JB, Kafka VG (2004) Saskatchewan fire regime analysis. Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Information Report NOR-X-194. (Edmonton, AB)

Parisien M-A, Peters VS, Wang Y, Little JM, Bosch EM , Stocks BJ (2006) Spatial patterns of forest fires in Canada, 1980–1999. International Journal of Wildland Fire  15, 361–374.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Perera AH, Buse LJ, Weber MG (Eds) (2004) ‘Emulating Natural Forest Landscape Disturbances: Concepts and Applications.’ (Columbia University Press: New York)

Potter CS, Randerson JT, Field CB, Matson PA, Vitousek PM, Mooney HA , Klooster SA (1993) Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles  7, 811–842.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing – reference index version 2.8.0. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/refman.pdf [Verified 16 November 2008]

Rees DC , Juday GP (2002) Plant species diversity on logged versus burned sites in central Alaska. Forest Ecology and Management  155, 291–302.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rempel RS, Carr AP (2003) Patch analyst extension for ArcView: Version 3. Available at http://flash.lakeheadu.ca/~rrempel/patch/index.html [Verified 16 November 2008]

Rowe JS (1961) Critique of some vegetational concepts as applied to forests of north-western Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany  39, 1007–1017.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Zasada JC, Sharik TL, Nygren M (1992) The reproductive process in boreal forest trees. In ‘A Systems Analysis of the Global Boreal Forest’. (Eds HH Shugart, R Leemans, GB Bonan) pp. 85–125. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)