Articles citing this paper
Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: a case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)
S. J. Vine A B , M. S. Crowther A C H , S. J. Lapidge D , C. R. Dickman A , N. Mooney E , M. P. Piggott F and A. W. English G
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Institute of Wildlife Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
B Present address: World Wildlife Fund-Australia, Level 13, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
C Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW), PO Box 1967, Hurstville, NSW 2220, Australia.
D Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, 48 Oxford Terrace, Unley, SA 5601, Australia.
E Wildlife Management Branch and Fox Eradication Branch, Department of Primary Industries and Water, GPO Box 44, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.
F Australian Centre for Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia. Present address: The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
G Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Werombi Road, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
H Corresponding author. Email: m.crowther@usyd.edu.au
Wildlife Research 36(5) 436-446 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR08069
Submitted: 12 May 2008 Accepted: 4 May 2009 Published: 21 July 2009
87 articles found in Crossref database.
Toward Reliable Estimates of Abundance: Comparing Index Methods to Assess the Abundance of a Mammalian Predator
Güthlin Denise,
Storch Ilse,
Küchenhoff Helmut, Festa-Bianchet Marco
PLoS ONE. 2014 9(4). p.e94537
Effectiveness and Applications of Hair Traps for the Study of Wild mammal populations
Barja Isabel,
Navarro-Castilla Álvaro, Pérez Laura
Polish Journal of Ecology. 2016 64(3). p.409
Effects of different attractants and human scent on mesocarnivore detection at camera traps
Heinlein Bracy W.,
Urbanek Rachael E.,
Olfenbuttel Colleen, Dukes Casey G.
Wildlife Research. 2020 47(4). p.338
Fecal pellet surveys and DNA analysis reveal that Appalachian cottontails (Sylvilagus obscurus) are more widespread than previously recorded in western Maryland
Petrick Kelly Russo,
Seddon William L.,
Lambert Thomas D., Ammer Frank K.
Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science. 2019 93(1). p.13
The behavioral responses of a nocturnal burrowing marsupial (Lasiorhinus latifrons) to drone flight
Headland Taylor,
Ostendorf Bertram, Taggart David
Ecology and Evolution. 2021 11(17). p.12173
Bottom-up and top-down processes interact to modify intraguild interactions in resource-pulse environments
Greenville Aaron C.,
Wardle Glenda M.,
Tamayo Bobby, Dickman Chris R.
Oecologia. 2014 175(4). p.1349
Rare or cryptic? The first report of an Omura's whale (Balaenoptera omurai) in the South Atlantic Ocean
Cypriano‐Souza Ana Lúcia,
de Meirelles Ana Carolina Oliveira,
Carvalho Vitor Luz, Bonatto Sandro Luis
Marine Mammal Science. 2017 33(1). p.80
The impacts and management of foxes Vulpes vulpes in Australia
SAUNDERS Glen R.,
GENTLE Matthew N., DICKMAN Christopher R.
Mammal Review. 2010 40(3). p.181
Detecting small and cryptic animals by combining thermography and a wildlife detection dog
Karp Denise
Scientific Reports. 2020 10(1).
Comparison of survey techniques on detection of northern flying squirrels
Diggins Corinne A.,
Gilley L. Michelle,
Kelly Christine A., Ford W. Mark
Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2016 40(4). p.654
Determining the efficacy of camera traps, live capture traps, and detection dogs for locating cryptic small mammal species
Thomas Morgan L.,
Baker Lynn,
Beattie James R., Baker Andrew M.
Ecology and Evolution. 2020 10(2). p.1054
Comparison of three methods of estimating the population size of an arboreal mammal in a fragmented rural landscape
Crowther Mathew S.,
Dargan Jessica R.,
Madani George,
Rus Adrian I.,
Krockenberger Mark B.,
McArthur Clare,
Moore Ben D.,
Lunney Daniel, Mella Valentina S. A.
Wildlife Research. 2021 48(2). p.105
The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia
Meek Paul D.,
Ballard Guy-Anthony,
Vernes Karl, Fleming Peter J. S.
Australian Mammalogy. 2015 37(1). p.1
Detecting and protecting the threatened Kangaroo Island dunnart (Sminthopsis fuliginosusaitkeni)
Hohnen Rosemary,
P. Murphy Brett,
A. Gates Jody,
Legge Sarah,
R. Dickman Chris, C. Z. Woinarski John
Conservation Science and Practice. 2019 1(1). p.e4
Snap happy: camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methods
Wearn Oliver R., Glover-Kapfer Paul
Royal Society Open Science. 2019 6(3). p.181748
You can’t run but you can hide: the negative influence of human presence on mid-sized mammals on an Atlantic island
Lessa Isadora Cristina Motta,
Ferreguetti Átilla Colombo,
Kajin Maja,
Dickman Christopher R., Bergallo Helena Godoy
Journal of Coastal Conservation. 2017 21(6). p.829
Detection probability of least tern and piping plover chicks in a large river system
Roche Erin A.,
Shaffer Terry L.,
Anteau Michael J.,
Sherfy Mark H.,
Stucker Jennifer H.,
Wiltermuth Mark T., Dovichin Colin M.
The Journal of Wildlife Management. 2014 78(4). p.709
Feasibility and application of using Texas horned lizard scat to predict lizard size and age class
Huerta Javier O.,
Henke Scott E.,
Wester David B.,
Eversole Cord B.,
Webb Stephen L., Hernandez Fidel
Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2023 47(3).
Time‐lapse camera trapping as an alternative to pitfall trapping for estimating activity of leaf litter arthropods
Collett Rachael A., Fisher Diana O.
Ecology and Evolution. 2017 7(18). p.7527
Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance
Mumma Matthew A.,
Zieminski Chris,
Fuller Todd K.,
Mahoney Shane P., Waits Lisette P.
Molecular Ecology Resources. 2015 15(5). p.1133
Evaluating camera traps as an alternative to live trapping for estimating the density of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) and red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus)
Villette Petra,
Krebs Charles J., Jung Thomas S.
European Journal of Wildlife Research. 2017 63(1).
Are shed hair genomes the most effective noninvasive resource for estimating relationships in the wild?
Khan Anubhab,
Patel Kaushalkumar,
Bhattacharjee Subhadeep,
Sharma Sudarshan,
Chugani Anup N.,
Sivaraman Karthikeyan,
Hosawad Vinayak,
Sahu Yogesh Kumar,
Reddy Goddilla V., Ramakrishnan Uma
Ecology and Evolution. 2020 10(11). p.4583
Slow recruitment in a red-fox population following poison baiting: a non-invasive mark–recapture analysis
Berry Oliver,
Tatler Jack,
Hamilton Neil,
Hilmer Steffi,
Hitchen Yvette, Algar Dave
Wildlife Research. 2013 40(7). p.615
A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities
De Bondi Natasha,
White John G.,
Stevens Mike, Cooke Raylene
Wildlife Research. 2010 37(6). p.456
Individual hunting behaviour and prey specialisation in the house cat Felis catus: Implications for conservation and management
Dickman Christopher R., Newsome Thomas M.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2015 173 p.76
Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture–recapture modelling
Lindsø Lars K.,
Dupont Pierre,
Rød-Eriksen Lars,
Andersskog Ida Pernille Øystese,
Ulvund Kristine Roaldsnes,
Flagstad Øystein,
Bischof Richard, Eide Nina E.
Oecologia. 2022 198(1). p.139
Did ‘precautionary’ 1080 baiting have a realistic potential to eradicate Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Tasmania without in situ monitoring data?
Marks Clive A.,
Edwards Ivo,
Obendorf David,
Pereira Filipe, Hall Graham P.
Ecological Management & Restoration. 2014 15(3). p.196
Hunter estimates of game density as a simple and efficient source of information for population monitoring: A comparison to targeted survey methods
Hušek Jan,
Boudreau Melanie R.,
Panek Marek, Rozylowicz Laurentiu
PLOS ONE. 2021 16(8). p.e0256580
Elliott traps found to be ineffective for the survey of swamp skink (Lissolepis coventryi): a cautionary tale of outdated survey guidelines
Humphrey Jacinta E.,
Robert Kylie A., Leonard Steve W. J.
Wildlife Research. 2017 44(7). p.514
Platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) body size, condition and population structure in Tasmanian river catchments: variability and potential mucormycosis impacts
Gust Nick, Griffiths Josh
Wildlife Research. 2011 38(4). p.271
Morphometric Analysis ofOryctes rhinoceros(L.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from Oil Palm Plantations
Manjeri G.,
Muhamad R.,
Faridah Q. Z., Tan S. G.
The Coleopterists Bulletin. 2013 67(2). p.194
The German wildlife information system (WILD): population densities and den use of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and badgers (Meles meles) during 2003–2007 in Germany
Keuling Oliver,
Greiser Grit,
Grauer Andreas,
Strauß Egbert,
Bartel-Steinbach Martina,
Klein Roland,
Wenzelides Ludger, Winter Armin
European Journal of Wildlife Research. 2011 57(1). p.95
Rapid recolonisation by the European red fox: how effective are uncoordinated and isolated control programs?
Newsome Thomas M.,
Crowther Mathew S., Dickman Christopher R.
European Journal of Wildlife Research. 2014 60(5). p.749
Genetic tagging reveals a significant impact of poison baiting on an invasive species
Berry Oliver,
Algar Dave,
Angus John,
Hamilton Neil,
Hilmer Steffi, Sutherland Duncan
The Journal of Wildlife Management. 2012 76(4). p.729
Power of faecal pellet count and camera trapping indices to monitor mammalian herbivore activity
Davis Naomi E.,
Di Stefano Julian,
Whelan Jim,
Wright John,
Taylor Lorraine,
Coulson Graeme,
Sitters Holly, Sullivan Tom
Wildlife Research. 2022 49(8). p.686
Spatially explicit capture–recapture analysis of bobcat (Lynx rufus) density: implications for mesocarnivore monitoring
Thornton Daniel H., Pekins Charles E.
Wildlife Research. 2015 42(5). p.394
Are koalas detected more effectively by systematic spotlighting or diurnal searches?
Wilmott Lachlan,
Cullen Dympna,
Madani George,
Krogh Martin, Madden Kylie
Australian Mammalogy. 2019 41(1). p.157
Drivers of taxonomic bias in conservation research: a global analysis of terrestrial mammals
dos Santos J. W.,
Correia R. A.,
Malhado A. C. M.,
Campos‐Silva J. V.,
Teles D.,
Jepson P., Ladle R. J.
Animal Conservation. 2020 23(6). p.679
Vehicle tracks are predator highways in intact landscapes
Raiter Keren G.,
Hobbs Richard J.,
Possingham Hugh P.,
Valentine Leonie E., Prober Suzanne M.
Biological Conservation. 2018 228 p.281
DNA from scats combined with capture–recapture modeling: a promising tool for estimating the density of red foxes—a pilot study in a boreal forest in southeast Norway
Wegge Per,
Bakke Beate Banken,
Odden Morten, Rolstad Jørund
Mammal Research. 2019 64(1). p.147
Observer differences in individual identification of feral cats from camera trap images
Sparkes Jessica,
Fleming Peter J. S., Goldingay Ross
Australian Mammalogy. 2022 45(1). p.32
What are we missing? How the delay-period setting on camera traps affects mesopredator detection
Sparkes Jessica,
Fleming Peter J. S.,
McSorley Adam, Mitchell Bruce
Australian Mammalogy. 2020 43(2). p.243
Evaluating the costs and sampling adequacy of a vertebrate monitoring program
Perkins G. C.,
Kutt A. S.,
Vanderduys E. P., Perry J. J.
Australian Zoologist. 2013 36(3). p.373
Sign surveys can be more efficient and cost effective than driven transects and camera trapping: a comparison of detection methods for a small elusive mammal, the numbat (
Seidlitz Anke,
Bryant Kate A.,
Armstrong Nicola J.,
Calver Michael C., Wayne Adrian F.
Wildlife Research. 2021 48(6). p.491
Comparing relative abundance models from different indices, a study case on the red fox
Martin-Garcia Sara,
Rodríguez-Recio Mariano,
Peragón Iván,
Bueno Itzcóatl, Virgós Emilio
Ecological Indicators. 2022 137 p.108778
Lethal 1080 baiting continues to reduce European Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) abundance after more than 25 years of continuous use in south‐west Western Australia
Marlow Nicola J.,
Thomas Neil D.,
Williams Andrew A. E.,
Macmahon Brian,
Lawson John,
Hitchen Yvette,
Angus John, Berry Oliver
Ecological Management & Restoration. 2015 16(2). p.131
The multilevel organismal diversity approach deciphers difficult to distinguish nudibranch species complex
Korshunova Tatiana A.,
Driessen Floor M. F.,
Picton Bernard E., Martynov Alexander V.
Scientific Reports. 2021 11(1).
The use of infrared sensors and digital cameras for documenting visitor use patterns: a case study from D'Aguilar National Park, south-east Queensland, Australia
Fairfax Russell James,
Dowling Ralph MacKenzie, Neldner Victor John
Current Issues in Tourism. 2014 17(1). p.72
Detecting pest and prey responses to fox control across the landscape using remote cameras
Towerton Alison L.,
Penman Trent D.,
Kavanagh Rodney P., Dickman Christopher R.
Wildlife Research. 2011 38(3). p.208
Opportunistically acquired evidence is unsuitable data to model fox (Vulpes vulpes) distribution in Tasmania
Marks Clive A.,
Obendorf David,
Pereira Filipe,
Edwards Ivo, Hall Graham P.
Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2014 38(4). p.757
Modelling Landscape-Level Numerical Responses of Predators to Prey: The Case of Cats and Rabbits
Cruz Jennyffer,
Glen Alistair S.,
Pech Roger P., Boyce Mark S.
PLoS ONE. 2013 8(9). p.e73544
Detecting mammals in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for biodiversity monitoring and management
Swan Matthew,
Di Stefano Julian,
Christie Fiona,
Steel Erin, York Alan
Biodiversity and Conservation. 2014 23(2). p.343
Wild boars’ social structure in the Mediterranean habitat
Maselli V.,
Rippa D.,
Russo G.,
Ligrone R.,
Soppelsa O.,
D’Aniello B.,
Raia P., Fulgione D.
Italian Journal of Zoology. 2014 81(4). p.610
Scavenging behavior of the Short-eared Dog (Atelocynus microtis) in Ecuadorian lowland rainforest
Lizana Victor,
Martínez-Carrasco Carlos,
Mosquera Diego,
Vinueza H. Gabriela,
Romo David,
Swing Kelly,
Cardells Jesús, Díaz Eduardo A.
Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. 2023 58(1). p.61
Comparison of Small-Mammal Sampling Techniques in Tidal Salt Marshes of the Central Gulf Coast of Florida
DeSa Melissa A.,
Zweig Christa L.,
Percival H. Franklin,
Kitchens Wiley M., Kasbohm John W.
Southeastern Naturalist. 2012 11(1). p.G17
Hiding in the dark: Local ecological knowledge about slow loris in Sarawak sheds light on relationships between human populations and wild animals
Miard Priscillia,
Nekaris K. A. I., Ramlee Hatta
Human Ecology. 2017 45(6). p.823
DNA genotypes reveal red fox (Vulpes vulpes) abundance, response to lethal control and limitations of contemporary survey techniques
Marks Clive A.,
Gigliotti Frank,
McPhee Steve,
Piggott Maxine P.,
Taylor Andrea, Glen Al. S.
Wildlife Research. 2009 36(8). p.647
Investigation into survey techniques of large mammals: surveyor competence and camera-trapping vs. transect-sampling
Roberts Nathan James
Bioscience Horizons: The International Journal of Student Research. 2011 4(1). p.40
Using eDNA, sediment subfossils, and zooplankton nets to detect invasive spiny water flea (Bythotrephes longimanus)
Walsh Jake R.,
Spear Michael J.,
Shannon Thomas P.,
Krysan Patrick J., Vander Zanden M. Jake
Biological Invasions. 2019 21(2). p.377
Evaluating scat surveys as a tool for population and community assessments
Paton Alexandra J.,
Buettel Jessie C., Brook Barry W.
Wildlife Research. 2021 49(3). p.206
Changing use of camera traps in mammalian field research: habitats, taxa and study types
McCallum Jamie
Mammal Review. 2013 43(3). p.196
Differences in the activity pattern of the wild boar Sus scrofa related to human disturbance
Ohashi Haruka,
Saito Masae,
Horie Reiko,
Tsunoda Hiroshi,
Noba Hiromu,
Ishii Haruka,
Kuwabara Takashi,
Hiroshige Yutaka,
Koike Shinsuke,
Hoshino Yoshinobu,
Toda Hiroto, Kaji Koichi
European Journal of Wildlife Research. 2013 59(2). p.167
Detecting and protecting the threatened Kangaroo Island dunnart (Sminthopsis fuliginosus aitkeni)
Hohnen Rosemary,
P. Murphy Brett,
A. Gates Jody,
Legge Sarah,
R. Dickman Chris, C. Z. Woinarski John
Conservation Science and Practice. 2019 1(1).
Evaluating predator control using two non-invasive population metrics: a camera trap activity index and density estimation from scat genotyping
Keem Jessica L.,
Hradsky Bronwyn A.,
Benshemesh Joe,
Le Pla Mark,
Watkins Abigail,
Weeks Andrew R.,
van Rooyen Anthony,
Black John,
Southwell Darren, Prowse Thomas
Wildlife Research. 2023 51(1).
Sign surveys for red fox (Vulpes vulpes) censuses: evaluating different sources of variation in scat detectability
Cortázar-Chinarro María,
Halvarsson Peter, Virgós Emilio
Mammal Research. 2019 64(2). p.183
The First Report on the Ecology and Distribution of the Wolf Population in Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni National Park
Buglione M.,
Troisi S. R.,
Petrelli S.,
van Vugt M.,
Notomista T.,
Troiano C.,
Bellomo A.,
Maselli V.,
Gregorio R., Fulgione D.
Biology Bulletin. 2020 47(6). p.640
Using Ultrasonic Acoustics to Detect Cryptic Flying Squirrels: Effects of Season and Habitat Quality
Diggins Corinne A.,
Gilley L. Michelle,
Kelly Christine A., Ford W. Mark
Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2020 44(2). p.300
False-positive occupancy models produce less-biased occupancy estimates for a rare and elusive bat species
Rojas Vanessa G,
Loeb Susan C, O’Keefe Joy M
Journal of Mammalogy. 2019 100(1). p.212
Comparing direct and indirect methods to estimate detection rates and site use of a cryptic semi-aquatic carnivore
Day Casey C.,
Westover Matthew D.,
Hall Lucas K.,
Larsen Randy T., McMillan Brock R.
Ecological Indicators. 2016 66 p.230
Using camera traps and N‐mixture models to estimate population abundance: Model selection really matters
Koetke Lisa Jeanne,
Hodder Dexter P., Johnson Chris J.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2024
Sniffing out the stakes: hair-snares for wild cats in arid environments
Hanke Petra U., Dickman Christopher R.
Wildlife Research. 2013 40(1). p.45
Niche-separation and conservation biogeography of Madagascar’s fork-marked lemurs (Cheirogaleidae: Phaner): Evidence of a new cryptic species?
Hending Daniel
Global Ecology and Conservation. 2021 29 p.e01738
Comparison of Small-Mammal Sampling Techniques in Tidal Salt Marshes of the Central Gulf Coast of Florida
DeSa Melissa A.,
Zweig Christa L.,
Percival H. Franklin,
Kitchens Wiley M., Kasbohm John W.
Southeastern Naturalist. 2012 11(1). p.89
Uniform performance of mammal detection methods under contrasting environmental conditions in Mediterranean landscapes
Suárez‐Tangil Bruno D., Rodríguez Alejandro
Ecosphere. 2021 12(3).
Spatial and temporal structure of a mesocarnivore guild in midwestern north America
Lesmeister Damon B.,
Nielsen Clayton K.,
Schauber Eric M., Hellgren Eric C.
Wildlife Monographs. 2015 191(1). p.1
Non-invasive hair sampling of Neotropical otters
Pedroso Nuno M.,
Dias Sofia V.,
Diniz-Reis Thais Rovere,
Santos-Reis Margarida, Verdade Luciano Martins
Biota Neotropica. 2018 18(4).
Multiple methods increase detection of large and medium-sized mammals: working with volunteers in south-eastern Oman
Mazzolli Marcelo,
Haag Taiana,
Lippert Beatriz G.,
Eizirik Eduardo,
Hammer Matthias L.A., Al Hikmani Khalid
Oryx. 2017 51(2). p.290
Inferring Species Interactions from Long-Term Monitoring Programs: Carnivores in a Protected Area from Southern Patagonia
Díaz-Ruiz Francisco,
Rodríguez Alejandro,
Procopio Diego,
Zapata Sonia,
Zanón-Martínez Juan Ignacio, Travaini Alejandro
Diversity. 2020 12(9). p.319
Landscape-scale factors determine occupancy of the critically endangered central rock-rat in arid Australia: The utility of camera trapping
McDonald Peter J.,
Griffiths Anthony D.,
Nano Catherine E.M.,
Dickman Chris R.,
Ward Simon J., Luck Gary W.
Biological Conservation. 2015 191 p.93
The applicability of camera trap data to monitor the cryptic Indian pangolin (Manus crassicaudata) populations: A survey from a tropical lowland rainforest in Southwest Sri Lanka
Perera Priyan,
Karawita Hasitha, Jayasinghe Chathuri
Global Ecology and Conservation. 2022 34 p.e02046
A Comparison of Visual and Genetic Techniques for Identifying Japanese Marten Scats - Enabling Diet Examination in Relation to Seasonal Food Availability in a Sub-Alpine Area of Japan
Hisano Masumi,
Hoshino Lisa,
Kamada Shouko,
Masuda Ryuichi,
Newman Chris, Kaneko Yayoi
Zoological Science. 2017 34(2). p.137
Capturing the cryptic: a comparison of detection methods for stoats (Mustela erminea) in alpine habitats
Smith Des H. V., Weston Kerry A.
Wildlife Research. 2017 44(5). p.418
New populations of the black-flanked rock-wallaby (Petrogale lateralis) from the Little Sandy Desert and Murchison, Western Australia
Turpin J. M.,
White N. E.,
Dunlop J. A., Bamford M. J.
Australian Mammalogy. 2018 40(2). p.234
Individual identification via remote video verified by DNA analysis: a case study of the American black bear
Ramsey Alan B.,
Sawaya Michael A.,
Bullington Lorinda S., Ramsey Philip W.
Wildlife Research. 2019 46(4). p.326
Spatial and temporal factors influencing wildlife use of overpass crossing structures and landscape siphons along a major canal
Hamilton Kaela M.,
Bommarito Thomas, Lewis Jesse S.
Biological Conservation. 2024 292 p.110481
How reliable are motion‐triggered camera traps for detecting small mammals and birds in ecological studies?
Ortmann C. R., Johnson S. D.
Journal of Zoology. 2021 313(3). p.202
The pitfalls of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia
Meek Paul D.,
Ballard Guy-Anthony, Fleming Peter J. S.
Australian Mammalogy. 2015 37(1). p.13
