Articles citing this paper
Nest-box use by arboreal mammals in a peri-urban landscape
Rebecca Durant A B , Gary W. Luck A C and Alison Matthews A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
B Murray–Darling Freshwater Research Centre, PO Box 991, Wodonga, Vic. 3689, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: galuck@csu.edu.au
Wildlife Research 36(7) 565-573 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09058
Submitted: 12 May 2009 Accepted: 23 August 2009 Published: 28 October 2009
25 articles found in Crossref database.
The Greater the Contact, the Closer the Threat: The Influence of Contact with Nature on the Social Perception of Biodiversity Loss and the Effectiveness of Conservation Behaviours
Bosone Lucia, Bertoldo Raquel
Sustainability. 2022 14(24). p.16490
To change or not to change? Perceived psychological barriers to individuals’ behavioural changes in favour of biodiversity conservation
Bosone Lucia,
Chaurand Nadine, Chevrier Marie
Ecosystems and People. 2022 18(1). p.315
Characteristics of tree hollows used by Australian arboreal and scansorial mammals
Goldingay Ross L.
Australian Journal of Zoology. 2011 59(5). p.277
Effects of entrance size, tree size and landscape context on nest box occupancy: Considerations for management and biodiversity offsets
Le Roux Darren S.,
Ikin Karen,
Lindenmayer David B.,
Bistricer Gideon,
Manning Adrian D., Gibbons Philip
Forest Ecology and Management. 2016 366 p.135
Do nest boxes breed the target species or its competitors? A case study of a critically endangered bird
Stojanovic Dejan,
Owens Giselle,
Young Catherine Mary,
Alves Fernanda, Heinsohn Robert
Restoration Ecology. 2021 29(3).
Detecting, but not affecting, nest-box occupancy
Moore Tracey,
de Tores Paul, Fleming Patricia A.
Wildlife Research. 2010 37(3). p.240
Distribution of tree-hollows and hollow preferences by parrots in an urban landscape
Davis Adrian,
Major Richard. E., Taylor Charlotte. E.
Emu - Austral Ornithology. 2014 114(4). p.295
Comparing the thermal suitability of nest-boxes and tree-hollows for the conservation-management of arboreal marsupials
Rowland Jessica A.,
Briscoe Natalie J., Handasyde Kathrine A.
Biological Conservation. 2017 209 p.341
Does nest box use reduce the fitness of a tree‐cavity dependent mammal?
Goldingay Ross L.
Ecological Research. 2017 32(4). p.495
Distribution and abundance of hollow-bearing trees in urban forest fragments
Treby Donna Louise, Castley James Guy
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2015 14(3). p.655
Use of wildlife-friendly structures in residential gardens by animal wildlife: evidence from citizen scientists in a global biodiversity hotspot
Van Helden Bronte E,
Skates Laura M, Close Paul G
Urban Ecosystems. 2024
Catalogue of the Australian social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae)
CARPENTER JAMES M. , BROWN GRAHAM R.
Zootaxa. 2022 5214(4). p.451
Den trees, hollow-bearing trees and nest boxes: management of squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis) nest sites in tropical Australian woodland
Ball Tina,
Goldingay Ross L., Wake Judith
Australian Mammalogy. 2011 33(1). p.106
Temperature variation in nest boxes in eastern Australia
Goldingay Ross L.
Australian Mammalogy. 2015 37(2). p.225
Alien vs. Predator: Impacts of Invasive Species and Native Predators on Urban Nest Box Use by Native Birds
Rogers Andrew M.,
Lermite Françoise,
Griffin Andrea S.,
van Rensburg Berndt J., Kark Salit
Animals. 2023 13(11). p.1807
Specific nest box designs can improve habitat restoration for cavity‐dependent arboreal mammals
Goldingay Ross L.,
Rueegger Niels N.,
Grimson Matthew J., Taylor Brendan D.
Restoration Ecology. 2015 23(4). p.482
Can chainsaw carved hollows provide an effective solution to the loss of natural tree cavities for arboreal mammals?
Terry William,
Goldingay Ross L., van der Ree Rodney
Forest Ecology and Management. 2021 490 p.119122
Conserving and restoring endangered southern populations of the Squirrel Glider (Petaurus norfolcensis) in agricultural landscapes
Crane Mason,
Lindenmayer David B., Banks Sam C.
Ecological Management & Restoration. 2017 18(1). p.15
Occupancy of chainsaw-carved hollows by an Australian arboreal mammal is influenced by cavity attributes and surrounding habitat
Best Katherine,
Haslem Angie,
Maisey Alex C.,
Semmens Kristin, Griffiths Stephen R.
Forest Ecology and Management. 2022 503 p.119747
Enriching small trees with artificial nest boxes cannot mimic the value of large trees for hollow‐nesting birds
Le Roux Darren S.,
Ikin Karen,
Lindenmayer David B.,
Bistricer Gideon,
Manning Adrian D., Gibbons Philip
Restoration Ecology. 2016 24(2). p.252
Chainsaw-Carved Cavities Better Mimic the Thermal Properties of Natural Tree Hollows than Nest Boxes and Log Hollows
Griffiths Stephen,
Lentini Pia,
Semmens Kristin,
Watson Simon,
Lumsden Linda, Robert Kylie
Forests. 2018 9(5). p.235
Do nest boxes in restored woodlands promote the conservation of hollow‐dependent fauna?
Lindenmayer David,
Crane Mason,
Blanchard Wade,
Okada Sachiko, Montague‐Drake Rebecca
Restoration Ecology. 2016 24(2). p.244
Using residents’ attitudes, knowledge and behaviours to improve biodiversity conservation in an Australian rural–urban landscape
Black Rosemary,
Gull Laird Shelby, Perez-Mujica Luisa
Rural Society. 2017 26(3). p.197
Nest box contentions: Are nest boxes used by the species they target?
Goldingay Ross L.,
Rohweder David, Taylor Brendan D.
Ecological Management & Restoration. 2020 21(2). p.115
Artificial refuges for wildlife conservation: what is the state of the science?
Cowan Mitchell A.,
Callan Michael N.,
Watson Maggie J.,
Watson David M.,
Doherty Tim S.,
Michael Damian R.,
Dunlop Judy A.,
Turner James M.,
Moore Harry A.,
Watchorn Darcy J., Nimmo Dale G.
Biological Reviews. 2021 96(6). p.2735
