Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The use of nest boxes in urban natural vegetation remnants by vertebrate fauna

Michael J. Harper A C , Michael A. McCarthy B and Rodney van der Ree B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B The Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology, Royal Botanic Gardens, South Yarra, Vic. 3141, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: m.harper@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au

Wildlife Research 32(6) 509-516 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04106
Submitted: 3 November 2004  Accepted: 11 July 2005   Published: 18 October 2005

Abstract

Nest boxes are routinely installed as a substitute for natural tree hollows to provide den and nest sites for a range of hollow-utilising fauna. We installed 120 nest boxes in 20 patches of indigenous vegetation (remnants) across the urban/suburban landscape of Melbourne, south-eastern Australia, and investigated their use by indigenous and exotic vertebrate species over a period of 12 months. Nest-box use was dominated by the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), the common ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) and the common myna (Acridotheres tristis), an aggressive introduced bird. We found that brushtail and ringtail possums utilised nest boxes all year round but more frequently in cooler months (May–August). Common mynas dominated nest-box use during spring/summer, potentially reducing the availability of this resource to indigenous species. We found evidence that the probability of a nest box being occupied by either species of possum was greater in remnants with abundant possum populations. Brushtail possums preferred thick-walled pine nest boxes over thin-walled plywood nest boxes, most likely owing to differences in their thermal insulation properties. Although considerable economic costs would be involved in using nest boxes as a long-term substitute for hollow-bearing trees, nest boxes may provide a temporary hollow resource until hollow-bearing trees are recruited in urban remnants.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank Pavlina Shukuroglou and Jeannie Campbell for proofreading this manuscript and the staff and students at the Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology for discussion and suggestions regarding improvements to the manuscript. This research was undertaken pursuant to the conditions of permit no. 10002113 issued by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria. Financial support for this research was generously supplied by the Holsworth Wildlife Trust and The Baker Foundation.


References

Ambrose G. J. (1982). An ecological and behavioral study of vertebrates using hollows in eucalypt branches. Ph.D. Thesis, La Trobe University, Melbourne.

Coelho, J. R. , and Sullivan, J. B. (1994). Colonization of wildlife nest boxes by honey bee swarms. American Bee Journal 134, 697–699.


Gibbons P. (1999). Habitat tree retention in wood production forests. Ph.D. Thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra.

Gibbons P. , and Lindenmayer D. B. (2002). ‘Tree Hollows and Wildlife Conservation in Australia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)

Golding B. G. (1979). Use of artificial hollows by mammals and birds in the Wombat Forest, Daylesford, Victoria. M.Env.Sci. Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne.

Grant J. (1997). ‘The Nestbox Book.’ (Gould League of Victoria: Melbourne.)

Hall, L. S. , Krausman, P. R. , and Morrison, M. L. (1997). The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25, 173–182.


Harley D. (2005). Patterns of nest box use by Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri): applications to research and conservation. In ‘The Biology of Australian Possums and Gliders’. (Eds R. Goldingay and S. Jackson.) pp. 318–329. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Harper, M. J. , McCarthy, M. A. , van der Ree, R. , and Fox, J. C. (2004). Overcoming bias in ground-based surveys of hollow-bearing trees using double-sampling. Forest Ecology and Management 190, 291–300.
CrossRef |

Harper, M. J. , McCarthy, M. A. , and van der Ree, R. (2005). The abundance of hollow-bearing trees in dry sclerophyll forest and the effect of wind on hollow development. Biological Conservation 122, 181–192.
CrossRef |

Humphrey, S. R. (1975). Nursery roosts and community diversity of Nearctic bats. Journal of Mammalogy 56, 321–346.


Kendeigh, S. C. (1961). Energy of birds conserved by roosting in cavities. Wilson Bulletin 73, 140–147.


Lindenmayer, D. B. , Tanton, M. T. , and Cunningham, R. B. (1991). A critique of the use of nest boxes required for the conservation of Leadbeater’s possum, Gymnobelideus leadbeateri.  Wildlife Research 18, 619–624.
CrossRef |

Lindenmayer, D. B. , Cunningham, R. B. , Donnelly, C. F. , Tanton, M. T. , and Nix, H. A. (1993). The abundance and development of cavities in Eucalyptus trees: a case study in the montane forests of Victoria, southeastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 60, 77–104.
CrossRef |

Lindenmayer, D. B. , Cunningham, R. B. , Pope, M. , Donnelly, C. F. , and Gibbons, P. (2000). Cavity sizes and types in Australian eucalypts from wet and dry forest types – a simple rule of thumb for estimating size and number of cavities. Forest Ecology and Management 137, 139–150.
CrossRef |

Lindenmayer, D. B. , MacGregor, C. , and Gibbons, P. (2002). Comment – Economics of a nest box program for the conservation of an endangered species: a re-appraisal. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 2244–2247.
CrossRef |

Lindenmayer, D. B. , MacGregor, C. I. , Cunningham, R. B. , Incoll, R. D. , Crane, M. , Rawlins, D. , and Michael, D. R. (2003). The use of nest boxes by arboreal marsupials in the forests of the central highlands of Victoria. Wildlife Research 30, 259–264.
CrossRef |

Link, W. A. , Cam, E. , Nichols, J. D. , and Cooch, E. G. (2002). Of BUGS and birds: Markov chain Monte Carlo for hierarchical modeling in wildlife research. Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 277–291.


Loyn, R. H. , McNabb, E. G. , Volodina, L. , and Willig, R. (2001). Modelling landscape distributions of large forest owls as applied to managing forests in north-east Victoria, Australia. Biological Conservation 97, 361–376.
CrossRef |

Mackowski C. M. (1984). The ontogeny of hollows in blackbutt (Eucalyptus pilularis) and its relevance to the management of forests for possums, gliders and pine. In ‘Possums and Gliders’. (Eds A. P. Smith and I. D. Hume.) pp. 553–567. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Mayle, B. A. (1990). A biological basis for bat conservation in British woodlands – a review. Mammal Review 20, 159–195.


McComb, W. C. , and Noble, R. E. (1981). Microclimates of nest boxes and natural cavities in bottomland hardwoods. Journal of Wildlife Management 45, 284–289.


Menkhorst P. W. (1984 a). The application of nest boxes in research and management of possums and gliders. In ‘Possums and Gliders’. (Eds A. P. Smith and I. D. Hume.) pp. 517–524. (Surrey Beatty: Sydney.)

Menkhorst, P. W. (1984b). Use of nest boxes by forest vertebrates in Gippsland: preference and demand. Australian Wildlife Research 11, 225–264.


Nixon, C. M. , Havera, S. P. , and Hansen, P. (1984). Effects of nest boxes on fox squirrel demography, condition and shelter use. American Midland Naturalist 112, 157–171.


Paton D. C. (1996). Overview of feral and managed honeybees in Australia: distribution, abundance, extent of interactions with native biota, evidence of impacts and future research. Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Canberra.

Pell, A. S. , and Tidemann, C. R. (1997a). The impact of two exotic hollow-nesting birds on two native parrots in savannah and woodland in eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 79, 145–153.
CrossRef |

Pell, A. S. , and Tidemann, C. R. (1997b). The ecology of the common myna in urban nature reserves in the Australian Capital Territory. Emu 97, 141–149.


Pirnat, J. (2000). Conservation and management of forest patches and corridors in suburban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 52, 135–143.
CrossRef |

Roulston G. F. (1935). ‘Reminiscences of the Early Days of Dandenong.’ (Dandenong and District Historical Society: Melbourne.)

Russell, B. G. , Smith, B. , and Augee, M. L. (2003). Changes to a population of common ringtail possums (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) after bushfire. Wildlife Research 30, 389–396.
CrossRef |

Saunders, D. A. (1979). The availability of tree hollows to use as nest sites by whitetailed black cockatoos. Australian Wildlife Research 6, 205–216.
CrossRef |

Saunders, D. A. , Smith, G. T. , Ingram, J. A. , and Forrester, R. I. (2003). Changes in a remnant of salmon gum Eucalyptus salmonophloia and York gum E. loxophleba woodland, 1978 to 1997. Implications for woodland conservation in the wheat–sheep regions of Australia. Biological Conservation 110, 245–256.
CrossRef |

Smith A. (1997). Squirrel gliders, Pittwater Council and housing development: on the brink. Your bush, their habitat, our act. Is the Threatened Species Conservation Act working? Nature Conservation Council, Sydney.

Soderquist, T. , and Mac Nally, R. (2000). The conservation value of mesic gullies in dry forest landscapes: mammal populations in the box–ironbark ecosystem of southern Australia. Biological Conservation 93, 281–291.
CrossRef |

Spiegelhalter D. , Thomas A. , Best N. , and Lunn D. (2003). ‘WinBUGS User Manual. Version 1.4.’ (MRC Biostatistics Unit: Cambridge, UK.)

Stains, H. J. (1961). Comparison of temperatures inside and outside two tree dens used by raccoons. Ecology 42, 410–413.


Statham, M. , and Statham, H. L. (1997). Movements and habits of brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr) in an urban area. Wildlife Research 24, 715–726.
CrossRef |

Thomson, J. A. , and Owen, W. H. (1964). A field study of the Australian ringtail possum Pseudocheirus peregrinus (Marsupialia: Phalangeridae). Ecological Monographs 34, 27–52.


van der Ree R. (2004). The impact of urbanisation on the mammals of Melbourne: do atlas records tell the whole story or just some of the chapters? In ‘Urban Wildlife, More Than Meets The Eye’. (Eds D. Lunney and S. Burgin.) pp. 195–204. (Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales: Sydney.)

Vitousek, P. M. , Mooney, H. A. , Lubchenco, J. , and Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499.
CrossRef |

Willner, G. R. , Gates, J. E. , and Devlin, W. J. (1983). Nest box use by cavity-nesting birds. American Midland Naturalist 109, 194–201.


Wormington, K. R. , and Lamb, D. (1999). Tree hollow development in wet and dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest in southeast Queensland, Australia. Australian Forestry 62, 336–345.



Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (33)