Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Visibility bias in aerial survey: mark–recapture, line-transect or both?

Jeff Laake A , Michelle J. Dawson B and Jim Hone B C

A National Marine Mammal Laboratory, AFSC, NMFS, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.

B Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.

C Corresponding author: jim.hone@canberra.edu.au

Wildlife Research 35(4) 299-309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR07034
Submitted: 19 March 2007  Accepted: 12 December 2007   Published: 27 June 2008

Abstract

Mark–recapture and line-transect sampling procedures both provide estimators for visibility bias in aerial surveys, and have coexisted in the literature for decades. Mark–recapture estimators of abundance tend to be negatively biased in this context as a result of unmodelled heterogeneity. Line-transect sampling can also be negatively biased if detection probability on the line is less than 1.0. Numerous papers have described hybrid approaches using mark–recapture and line transect methods but there have been some subtle but important differences that may not be apparent to the practitioner. We have used wild horse survey data collected in south-eastern Australia and some imaginary data to highlight these subtle differences. We demonstrate the advantage of using the hybrid approach, which uses the strengths of both mark–recapture and line-transect procedures by fitting a detection function (with p(0) = 1) to the line-transect data to estimate the shape of the detection function, and uses a separate detection function for the mark–recapture data to estimate the intercept (p(0)).


References

Alho J. 1990 Logistic regression in capture–recapture models. Biometrics 46 623 635 DOI

Alpizar-Jara R. Pollock K. H. 1996 A combination line transect and capture–recapture sampling model for multiple observers in aerial surveys. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 3 311 327 DOI

Anderson C. R. Jr Lindzey F. G. 1996 Moose sightability model developed from helicopter surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24 247 259

Anderson D. R. Burnham K. P. 2002 Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods. Journal of Wildlife Management 66 912 918
DOI

Borchers D. L. (1996). Line transect abundance estimation with uncertain detection on the trackline. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Borchers D. L., and Burnham K. P. (2004). General formulation for distance sampling. In ‘Advanced Distance Sampling’. (Eds S. T. Buckland, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers and L. Thomas.) pp. 6–30. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Borchers D. L. Zucchini W. Fewster R. 1998 a Mark–recapture models for line transect surveys. Biometrics 54 1207 1220 DOI

Borchers D. L. Buckland S. T. Goedhart P. W. Clarke E. D. Hedley S. L. 1998 b Horvitz–Thompson estimators for double-platform line transect surveys. Biometrics 54 1221 1237 DOI

Borchers D. L. Laake J. L. Southwell C. Paxton C. G. M. 2006 Accommodating unmodelled heterogeneity in double-observer distance sampling surveys. Biometrics 62 372 378 DOI

Buckland S. T. 1992 Effects of heterogeneity on estimation of probability of detection on the trackline. Report of the International Whaling Commission 42 569 573

Buckland S. T. Turnock B. J. 1992 A robust line transect method. Biometrics 48 901 909
DOI

Buckland S. T. Breiwick J. M. Cattanach K. L. Laake J. L. 1993 Estimated population size of the California gray whale. Marine Mammal Science 9 235 249 DOI

Buckland S. T., Anderson D. R., Burnham K. P., Laake J. L., Borchers D. L., and Thomas L. (2001). ‘Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.’ (Oxford University Press: London.)

Burnham K. P., Anderson D. R., and Laake J. L. (1980). Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildlife Monographs No. 72.

Burnham K. P., Buckland S. T., Laake J. L., Borchers D. L., Marques T. A., Bishop J. R. B., and Thomas L. (2004). Further topics in distance sampling. In ‘Advanced Distance Sampling’. (Eds S. T. Buckland, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers and L. Thomas.) pp. 307–392. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Butterworth D. S. Borchers D. L. 1988 Estimates of g(0) for minke schools from the results of the independent observer experiment on the 1985/86 and 1986/87 IWC/IDCR Antarctic assessment cruises. Report of the International Whaling Commission 38 301 313

Butterworth D. S. Best P. B. Basson M. 1982 Results of analysis of sighting experiments carried out during the 1980/1 Southern Hemisphere minke whale assessment cruise. Report of the International Whaling Commission 32 819 834


Carretta J. V. Forney K. A. Laake J. L. 1998 Abundance of California coastal bottlenose dolphins estimated from tandem aerial surveys. Marine Mammal Science 14 655 675
DOI

Caughley G. 1974 Bias in aerial survey. Journal of Wildlife Management 38 921 933 DOI

Chen S. X. 1999 Estimation in independent observer line transect surveys for clustered populations. Biometrics 55 754 759 DOI

Chen S. X. 2000 Animal abundance estimation in independent observer line transect surveys. Ecological Statistics 7 285 299 DOI

Cook R. D. Jacobsen J. O. 1979 A design for estimating visibility bias in aerial surveys. Biometrics 35 735 742 DOI

Fewster R. M. Laake J. L. Buckland S. T. 2005 Line transect sampling in small and large regions. Biometrics 61 856 858 DOI

Graham A. Bell R. 1989 Investigating observer bias in aerial survey by simultaneous double-counts. Journal of Wildlife Management 53 1009 1016 DOI

Hiby A. R. Hammond P. S. 1989 Survey techniques for estimating abundance of cetaceans. Report of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 11 47 80

Hiby A. R. Lovell P. 1998 Using aircraft in tandem formation to estimate abundance of harbour porpoise. Biometrics 54 1280 1289
DOI

Huggins R. M. 1989 On the statistical analysis of capture experiments. Biometrika 76 133 140 DOI

Huggins R. M. 1991 Some practical aspects of a conditional likelihood approach to capture experiments. Biometrics 47 725 732 DOI

Innes S. Heide-Jorgensen M. Laake J. Laidre K. Cleator H. Richard P. Stewart R. 2002 Surveys of belugas and narwhals in the Canadian high Arctic in 1996. North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission Scientific Publications 4 169 190

Laake J. L. (1978). Line transect estimators robust to animal movement. M.S. Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT.

Laake J. (1999). Distance sampling with independent observers: reducing bias from heterogeneity by weakening the conditional independence assumption. In ‘Marine Mammal Survey and Assessment Methods’. (Eds G. Amstrup, S. Garner, J. Laake, B. Manly, L. McDonald and D. Robertson.) pp. 137–148. (Balkema: Rotterdam.)

Laake J. L., and Borchers D. L. (2004). Methods for incomplete detection at distance zero. In ‘Advanced Distance Sampling’. (Eds S. T. Buckland, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers and L. Thomas.) pp. 108–189. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Laake J. L. Calambokidis J. C. Osmek S. D. Rugh D. J. 1997 Probability of detecting harbor porpoise from aerial surveys: estimating g(0). Journal of Wildlife Management 61 63 75
DOI

Linklater W. Cameron E. 2002 Escape behaviour of feral horses during a helicopter count. Wildlife Research 29 221 224 DOI

Manly B. F. J. McDonald L. L. Garner G. W. 1996 Maximum likelihood estimation for the double-count method with independent observers. Journal of Agricultural Biological & Environmental Statistics 1 170 189 DOI

Marques F. F. C., and Buckland S. T. (2004). Covariate models for the detection function. In ‘Advanced Distance Sampling’. (Eds S. T. Buckland, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers and L. Thomas.) pp. 31–47. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Marsh H. Sinclair D. F. 1989 Correcting for visibility bias in strip transect aerial surveys of aquatic fauna. Journal of Wildlife Management 53 1017 1024 DOI

Melville G. J. Welsh A. H. 2001 Line transect sampling in small regions. Biometrics 57 1130 1137 DOI

Otis D. L., Burnham K. P., White G. C., and Anderson D. R. (1978). Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs No. 62.

Palka D. 1995 Abundance estimate of the Gulf of Maine harbor porpoise. Report of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 16 27 50

Pollock K. H. Kendall W. L. 1987 Visibility bias in aerial surveys: a review of estimation procedures. Journal of Wildlife Management 51 502 510
DOI

Potvin F. Breton L. Rivest L.-P. Gringas A. 1992 Application of a double-count aerial survey technique for whitetailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus, on Anticosti Island. Canadian Field Naturalist 106 435 442

Quang P. X. Becker E. F. 1997 Combining line transect and double count sampling techniques for aerial surveys. Journal of Agricultural Biological & Environmental Statistics 2 230 242
DOI

Rugh D. J. Ferrero R. C. Dahlheim M. E. 1990 Inter-observer count discrepancies in a shore-based census of gray whales (Eschrictius robustus). Marine Mammal Science 6 109 120 DOI

Samuel M. D. Garton E. O. Schlegel M. W. Carson R. G. 1987 Visibility bias during aerial surveys of elk in north central Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management 51 622 630 DOI

Schweder T. 1990 Independent observer experiments to estimate the detection function in line transect surveys of whales. Report of the International Whaling Commission 40 349 355

Schweder T. Hagen G. Helgeland J. Koppervik I. 1996 Abundance estimation of northeastern Atlantic minke whales. Report of the International Whaling Commission 46 391 405


Schweder T. Skaug H. J. Dimakos X. K. Langaas M. ¥ien N. 1997 Abundance of northeastern Atlantic minke whales, estimates for 1989 and 1995. Report of the International Whaling Commission 47 453 483


Skaug H. Schweder T. 1999 Hazard models for line transect surveys with independent observers. Biometrics 55 29 36
DOI

Steinhorst R. K. Samuel M. D. 1989 Sightability adjustment methods for aerial surveys of wildlife populations. Biometrics 45 415 425 DOI

Swann D. E. Averill-Murray R. C. Schwalbe C. R. 2002 Distance sampling for Sonoran Desert tortoises. Journal of Wildlife Management 66 969 975 DOI

Thomas L., Laake J. L., Strindberg S., Marques F. F. C., Buckland S. T., et al. (2006). Distance 5.0. Release 1. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom. http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance/

Walter M. J. Hone J. 2003 A comparison of 3 aerial survey techniques to estimate wild horse abundance in the Australian Alps. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31 1138 1149

White G. C. Burnham K. P. 1999 Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 120 138
Supplement

Zeh J. E., Clark C. W., George J. C., Withrow D., Carroll G. M., and Koski W. R. (1993). Current population size and dynamics. In ‘The Bowhead Whale: 409489’. (Eds J. J. Burns, J. J. Montague and C. J. Cowles.) Society of Marine Mammals Special Publication No. 2.



Export Citation