Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Visibility bias in aerial survey: mark–recapture, line-transect or both?

Jeff Laake A , Michelle J. Dawson B and Jim Hone B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Marine Mammal Laboratory, AFSC, NMFS, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.

B Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia.

C Corresponding author: jim.hone@canberra.edu.au

Wildlife Research 35(4) 299-309 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07034
Submitted: 19 March 2007  Accepted: 12 December 2007   Published: 27 June 2008

Abstract

Mark–recapture and line-transect sampling procedures both provide estimators for visibility bias in aerial surveys, and have coexisted in the literature for decades. Mark–recapture estimators of abundance tend to be negatively biased in this context as a result of unmodelled heterogeneity. Line-transect sampling can also be negatively biased if detection probability on the line is less than 1.0. Numerous papers have described hybrid approaches using mark–recapture and line transect methods but there have been some subtle but important differences that may not be apparent to the practitioner. We have used wild horse survey data collected in south-eastern Australia and some imaginary data to highlight these subtle differences. We demonstrate the advantage of using the hybrid approach, which uses the strengths of both mark–recapture and line-transect procedures by fitting a detection function (with p(0) = 1) to the line-transect data to estimate the shape of the detection function, and uses a separate detection function for the mark–recapture data to estimate the intercept (p(0)).


Acknowledgements

We thank the pilot, P. Potroz, and the Australian Alps Liaison Committee and the University of Canberra for funding. The New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service provided logistic support. We thank Alex Zerbini, Kim Goetz, David Anderson and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that led to useful improvements in the manuscript.


References

Alho, J. (1990). Logistic regression in capture–recapture models. Biometrics 46, 623–635.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Alpizar-Jara, R. , and Pollock, K. H. (1996). A combination line transect and capture–recapture sampling model for multiple observers in aerial surveys. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 3, 311–327.
CrossRef |

Anderson, C. R. , and Lindzey, F. G. (1996). Moose sightability model developed from helicopter surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24, 247–259.


Anderson, D. R. , and Burnham, K. P. (2002). Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods. Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 912–918.
CrossRef |

Borchers D. L. (1996). Line transect abundance estimation with uncertain detection on the trackline. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Borchers D. L., and Burnham K. P. (2004). General formulation for distance sampling. In ‘Advanced Distance Sampling’. (Eds S. T. Buckland, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers and L. Thomas.) pp. 6–30. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Borchers, D. L. , Zucchini, W. , and Fewster, R. (1998a). Mark–recapture models for line transect surveys. Biometrics 54, 1207–1220.
CrossRef |

Borchers, D. L. , Buckland, S. T. , Goedhart, P. W. , Clarke, E. D. , and Hedley, S. L. (1998b). Horvitz–Thompson estimators for double-platform line transect surveys. Biometrics 54, 1221–1237.
CrossRef |

Borchers, D. L. , Laake, J. L. , Southwell, C. , and Paxton, C. G. M. (2006). Accommodating unmodelled heterogeneity in double-observer distance sampling surveys. Biometrics 62, 372–378.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Buckland, S. T. (1992). Effects of heterogeneity on estimation of probability of detection on the trackline. Report of the International Whaling Commission 42, 569–573.


Buckland, S. T. , and Turnock, B. J. (1992). A robust line transect method. Biometrics 48, 901–909.
CrossRef |

Buckland, S. T. , Breiwick, J. M. , Cattanach, K. L. , and Laake, J. L. (1993). Estimated population size of the California gray whale. Marine Mammal Science 9, 235–249.
CrossRef |

Buckland S. T., Anderson D. R., Burnham K. P., Laake J. L., Borchers D. L., and Thomas L. (2001). ‘Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.’ (Oxford University Press: London.)

Burnham K. P., Anderson D. R., and Laake J. L. (1980). Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildlife Monographs No. 72.

Burnham K. P., Buckland S. T., Laake J. L., Borchers D. L., Marques T. A., Bishop J. R. B., and Thomas L. (2004). Further topics in distance sampling. In ‘Advanced Distance Sampling’. (Eds S. T. Buckland, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers and L. Thomas.) pp. 307–392. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Butterworth, D. S. , and Borchers, D. L. (1988). Estimates of g(0) for minke schools from the results of the independent observer experiment on the 1985/86 and 1986/87 IWC/IDCR Antarctic assessment cruises. Report of the International Whaling Commission 38, 301–313.


Butterworth, D. S. , Best, P. B. , and Basson, M. (1982). Results of analysis of sighting experiments carried out during the 1980/1 Southern Hemisphere minke whale assessment cruise. Report of the International Whaling Commission 32, 819–834.


Carretta, J. V. , Forney, K. A. , and Laake, J. L. (1998). Abundance of California coastal bottlenose dolphins estimated from tandem aerial surveys. Marine Mammal Science 14, 655–675.
CrossRef |

Caughley, G. (1974). Bias in aerial survey. Journal of Wildlife Management 38, 921–933.
CrossRef |

Chen, S. X. (1999). Estimation in independent observer line transect surveys for clustered populations. Biometrics 55, 754–759.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Chen, S. X. (2000). Animal abundance estimation in independent observer line transect surveys. Ecological Statistics 7, 285–299.
CrossRef |

Cook, R. D. , and Jacobsen, J. O. (1979). A design for estimating visibility bias in aerial surveys. Biometrics 35, 735–742.
CrossRef |

Fewster, R. M. , Laake, J. L. , and Buckland, S. T. (2005). Line transect sampling in small and large regions. Biometrics 61, 856–858.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Graham, A. , and Bell, R. (1989). Investigating observer bias in aerial survey by simultaneous double-counts. Journal of Wildlife Management 53, 1009–1016.
CrossRef |

Hiby, A. R. , and Hammond, P. S. (1989). Survey techniques for estimating abundance of cetaceans. Report of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 11, 47–80.


Hiby, A. R. , and Lovell, P. (1998). Using aircraft in tandem formation to estimate abundance of harbour porpoise. Biometrics 54, 1280–1289.
CrossRef |

Huggins, R. M. (1989). On the statistical analysis of capture experiments. Biometrika 76, 133–140.
CrossRef |

Huggins, R. M. (1991). Some practical aspects of a conditional likelihood approach to capture experiments. Biometrics 47, 725–732.
CrossRef |

Innes, S. , Heide-Jorgensen, M. , Laake, J. , Laidre, K. , Cleator, H. , Richard, P. , and Stewart, R. (2002). Surveys of belugas and narwhals in the Canadian high Arctic in 1996. North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission Scientific Publications 4, 169–190.


Laake J. L. (1978). Line transect estimators robust to animal movement. M.S. Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT.

Laake J. (1999). Distance sampling with independent observers: reducing bias from heterogeneity by weakening the conditional independence assumption. In ‘Marine Mammal Survey and Assessment Methods’. (Eds G. Amstrup, S. Garner, J. Laake, B. Manly, L. McDonald and D. Robertson.) pp. 137–148. (Balkema: Rotterdam.)

Laake J. L., and Borchers D. L. (2004). Methods for incomplete detection at distance zero. In ‘Advanced Distance Sampling’. (Eds S. T. Buckland, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers and L. Thomas.) pp. 108–189. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Laake, J. L. , Calambokidis, J. C. , Osmek, S. D. , and Rugh, D. J. (1997). Probability of detecting harbor porpoise from aerial surveys: estimating g(0). Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 63–75.
CrossRef |

Linklater, W. , and Cameron, E. (2002). Escape behaviour of feral horses during a helicopter count. Wildlife Research 29, 221–224.
CrossRef |

Manly, B. F. J. , McDonald, L. L. , and Garner, G. W. (1996). Maximum likelihood estimation for the double-count method with independent observers. Journal of Agricultural Biological & Environmental Statistics 1, 170–189.
CrossRef |

Marques F. F. C., and Buckland S. T. (2004). Covariate models for the detection function. In ‘Advanced Distance Sampling’. (Eds S. T. Buckland, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers and L. Thomas.) pp. 31–47. (Oxford University Press: Oxford.)

Marsh, H. , and Sinclair, D. F. (1989). Correcting for visibility bias in strip transect aerial surveys of aquatic fauna. Journal of Wildlife Management 53, 1017–1024.
CrossRef |

Melville, G. J. , and Welsh, A. H. (2001). Line transect sampling in small regions. Biometrics 57, 1130–1137.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Otis D. L., Burnham K. P., White G. C., and Anderson D. R. (1978). Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs No. 62.

Palka, D. (1995). Abundance estimate of the Gulf of Maine harbor porpoise. Report of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 16, 27–50.


Pollock, K. H. , and Kendall, W. L. (1987). Visibility bias in aerial surveys: a review of estimation procedures. Journal of Wildlife Management 51, 502–510.
CrossRef |

Potvin, F. , Breton, L. , Rivest, L.-P. , and Gringas, A. (1992). Application of a double-count aerial survey technique for whitetailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus, on Anticosti Island. Canadian Field Naturalist 106, 435–442.


Quang, P. X. , and Becker, E. F. (1997). Combining line transect and double count sampling techniques for aerial surveys. Journal of Agricultural Biological & Environmental Statistics 2, 230–242.
CrossRef |

Rugh, D. J. , Ferrero, R. C. , and Dahlheim, M. E. (1990). Inter-observer count discrepancies in a shore-based census of gray whales (Eschrictius robustus). Marine Mammal Science 6, 109–120.
CrossRef |

Samuel, M. D. , Garton, E. O. , Schlegel, M. W. , and Carson, R. G. (1987). Visibility bias during aerial surveys of elk in north central Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management 51, 622–630.
CrossRef |

Schweder, T. (1990). Independent observer experiments to estimate the detection function in line transect surveys of whales. Report of the International Whaling Commission 40, 349–355.


Schweder, T. , Hagen, G. , Helgeland, J. , and Koppervik, I. (1996). Abundance estimation of northeastern Atlantic minke whales. Report of the International Whaling Commission 46, 391–405.


Schweder, T. , Skaug, H. J. , Dimakos, X. K. , Langaas, M. , and ¥ien, N. (1997). Abundance of northeastern Atlantic minke whales, estimates for 1989 and 1995. Report of the International Whaling Commission 47, 453–483.


Skaug, H. , and Schweder, T. (1999). Hazard models for line transect surveys with independent observers. Biometrics 55, 29–36.
CrossRef | PubMed |

Steinhorst, R. K. , and Samuel, M. D. (1989). Sightability adjustment methods for aerial surveys of wildlife populations. Biometrics 45, 415–425.
CrossRef |

Swann, D. E. , Averill-Murray, R. C. , and Schwalbe, C. R. (2002). Distance sampling for Sonoran Desert tortoises. Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 969–975.
CrossRef |

Thomas L., Laake J. L., Strindberg S., Marques F. F. C., Buckland S. T., et al. (2006). Distance 5.0. Release 1. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom. http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance/

Walter, M. J. , and Hone, J. (2003). A comparison of 3 aerial survey techniques to estimate wild horse abundance in the Australian Alps. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 1138–1149.


White, G. C. , and Burnham, K. P. (1999). Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46, 120–138.Supplement


Zeh J. E., Clark C. W., George J. C., Withrow D., Carroll G. M., and Koski W. R. (1993). Current population size and dynamics. In ‘The Bowhead Whale: 409489’. (Eds J. J. Burns, J. J. Montague and C. J. Cowles.) Society of Marine Mammals Special Publication No. 2.




� MJD previously published as M. J. Walter.


Rent Article (via Deepdyve) Export Citation Cited By (27)