Can citizen science monitor whale-shark aggregations? Investigating bias in mark–recapture modelling using identification photographs sourced from the publicTim K. Davies A F , Guy Stevens B , Mark G. Meekan C , Juliane Struve D and J. Marcus Rowcliffe E
A Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.
B Maldivian Manta Ray Project, Catemwood House, Corscombe, Dorchester, Dorset, DT2 0NT, UK.
C Australian Institute of Marine Science, UWA Oceans Institute (MO96), 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
D University of Florida, Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 7922 NW 71st Street, Gainesville, FL 32653, USA.
E Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
F Corresponding author. Email: email@example.com
Wildlife Research 39(8) 696-704 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR12092
Submitted: 10 May 2012 Accepted: 30 September 2012 Published: 24 October 2012
Context: The conservation status of the whale shark, Rhincodon typus, remains uncertain. Throughout their range, whale sharks are a focus for wildlife tourism and many identification photographs taken by tourists have become available online, presenting a potentially valuable source of data for monitoring populations using mark–recapture techniques. However, the suitability of these photographs for mark–recapture models has yet to be investigated.
Aims: We explore the suitability of identification-photographs available from online databases to produce assessments of life-history parameters and conservation status of whale sharks in the Maldives.
Methods: To test the validity of using publically sourced images, we used photo-identification images collected from both experienced researchers and tourists between 2003 and 2008 to construct two databases. Images taken by tourists were compiled from online databases. Researcher and public databases were analysed separately and the results of mark–recapture models then compared.
Key results: The dataset constructed from online public databases did not violate the assumptions of mark–recapture modelling. Estimates of parameters and abundance obtained from models using these data were similar to those produced using data provided by experienced researchers.
Conclusions: Publically sourced data allowed for the accurate estimation of abundance of whale sharks. These estimates were not confounded by the suitability of photographs, probably because of the high encounter rate in the aggregation, the high residency rate of sharks and the retrospective nature of photo-identification, which limited heterogeneity in capture probability between marked and unmarked sharks.
Implications: Our findings support the use of publically sourced data for use in mark–recapture studies of whale sharks, at least in situations where sharks are resident to the location. This approach will be useful in regions where data collected by tourists are available online, and research funding is limited.
Additional keywords: abundance, flickr, photo-identification, online database, resight, survival, threatened species, YouTube.
ReferencesAkaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Theory’. (Eds B. N. Petrov and F. Czaki.) pp. 267–281. (Akademiai Kiado: Budapest.)
Anderson, R. C., and Ahmed, H. (1993). ‘The shark fisheries of the Maldives .’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome.)
Arzoumanian, Z., Holmberg, J., and Norman, B. (2005). An astronomical pattern-matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 999–1011.
| An astronomical pattern-matching algorithm for computer-aided identification of whale sharks Rhincodon typus.CrossRef |
Bradshaw, C. J. A., Mollet, H. F., and Meekan, M. G. (2007). Inferring population trends for the world’s largest fish from mark–recapture estimates of survival. Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 480–489.
| Inferring population trends for the world’s largest fish from mark–recapture estimates of survival.CrossRef |
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., White, G. C., Brownie, C., and Pollock, K. H. (1987). Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture. American Fisheries Society Monograph 5, 437 pp.
Hammond, P. S., Mizroch, S. A., and Donovan, G. P. (1990). Individual recognition of cetaceans: use of photo-identification and other techniques to estimate population parameters. Report of the International Whaling Commission 12, 440 pp..
Holmberg, J., Norman, B., and Arzoumanian, Z. (2008). Robust, comparable population metrics through collaborative photo-monitoring of whale sharks Rhincodon typus. Ecological Applications 18, 222–233.
| Robust, comparable population metrics through collaborative photo-monitoring of whale sharks Rhincodon typus.CrossRef |
Holmberg, J., Norman, B., and Arzoumanian, Z. (2009). Estimating population size, structure, and residency time for whale sharks Rhincodon typus through collaborative photo-identification. Endangered Species Research 7, 39–53.
| Estimating population size, structure, and residency time for whale sharks Rhincodon typus through collaborative photo-identification.CrossRef |
Ichii, T., Mahapatra, K., Okamura, H., and Okada, Y. (2006). Stock assessment of the autumn cohort of neon flying squid Ommastrephes bartramii in the North Pacific based on past large-scale high seas driftnet fishery data. Fisheries Research 78, 286–297.
| Stock assessment of the autumn cohort of neon flying squid Ommastrephes bartramii in the North Pacific based on past large-scale high seas driftnet fishery data.CrossRef |
Langtimm, C. A., Beck, C. A., Edwards, H. H., Fick-Child, K. J., Ackerman, B. B., Barton, S. L., and Hartley, W. C. (2004). Survival estimates for Florida manatees from the photo-identification of individuals. Marine Mammal Science 20, 438–463.
| Survival estimates for Florida manatees from the photo-identification of individuals.CrossRef |
Meekan, M. G., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Press, M., McLean, C., Richards, A., Quasnichka, S., and Taylor, J. G. (2006). Population size and structure of whale sharks Rhincodon typus at Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 319, 275–285.
| Population size and structure of whale sharks Rhincodon typus at Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia.CrossRef |
Myers, R. A., Baum, J. K., Shepherd, T. D., Powers, S. P., and Peterson, C. H. (2007). Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 315, 1846–1850.
| Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean.CrossRef | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsFSitrw%3D&md5=1dcc8af9a866abcc1fdc7e1e9051f0f7CAS |
Olsen, I. C. (2006). The analysis of continuous mark–recapture data . Ph.D. Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., and Anderson, D. R. (1978). Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs 62, 3–135.
Riley, M. J., Hale, M., Harman, A., and Rees, R. G. (2010). Analysis of whale shark Rhincondon typus aggregations near South Ari Atoll, Maldives Archipelago. Aquatic Biology 8, 145–150.
| Analysis of whale shark Rhincondon typus aggregations near South Ari Atoll, Maldives Archipelago.CrossRef |
Rowat, D., and Gore, M. (2007). Regional scale horizontal and local scale vertical movements of whale sharks in the Indian Ocean off Seychelles. Fisheries Research 84, 32–40.
| Regional scale horizontal and local scale vertical movements of whale sharks in the Indian Ocean off Seychelles.CrossRef |
Rowat, D., Speed, C. W., Meekan, M. G., Gore, M. A., and Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2009). Population abundance and apparent survival of the vulnerable whale shark Rhincodon typus in the Seychelles aggregation. Oryx 43, 591–598.
| Population abundance and apparent survival of the vulnerable whale shark Rhincodon typus in the Seychelles aggregation.CrossRef |
Schwarz, C. J., and Arnason, A. N. (1996). A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics 52, 860–873.
| A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations.CrossRef |
Speed, C. W., Meekan, M. G., and Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2007). Spot the match: wildlife photo-identification using information theory. Frontiers in Zoology 4, 2.
| Spot the match: wildlife photo-identification using information theory.CrossRef |
Stanley, T. R., and Burnham, K. P. (1999). A closure test for time-specific capture–recapture data. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 6, 197–209.
| A closure test for time-specific capture–recapture data.CrossRef |
Taylor, G. (1994). ‘Whale Sharks: the Giants of Ningaloo Reef.’ (Angus & Robertson Publishers: Sydney.)
Van Tienhoven, A. M., Den Hartog, J. E., Reijns, R. A., and Peddemors, V. M. (2007). A computer-aided program for pattern-matching of natural marks on the spotted raggedtooth shark Carcharias taurus. Journal of Applied Ecology 44, 273–280.
| A computer-aided program for pattern-matching of natural marks on the spotted raggedtooth shark Carcharias taurus.CrossRef |
White, G. C., and Burnham, K. P. (1999). Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46, S120–S139.
| Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals.CrossRef |
Williams, B. K., Nichols, J. D., and Conroy, M. J. (2002). ‘Analysis and Management of Animal Populations: Modeling, Estimation, and Decision Making.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)