Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Degradation and detection of fox (Vulpes vulpes) scats in Tasmania: evidence from field trials

W. E. Brown A C D , D. S. L. Ramsey B and R. Gaffney A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Invasive Species Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, GPO Box 44 Hobart, Tas. 7000 Australia.

B Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia.

C Present address: Save the Tasmanian Devil Program, Wildlife Management Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, GPO Box 44 Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: Bill.Brown@dpipwe.tas.gov.au

Wildlife Research 41(8) 681-690 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR14152
Submitted: 25 July 2014  Accepted: 2 February 2015   Published: 30 March 2015

Abstract

Context: The Tasmanian Government is attempting to eradicate foxes from Tasmania and carnivore-scat surveys using humans and dogs combined with DNA testing are the main methods of detection. Understanding the rate that scats degrade is a key component for estimating the power of monitoring for detecting cryptic predators and will contribute to a broader understanding of the use of scat monitoring for informing eradication programs.

Aims: To estimate the degradation rate of fox scats and derive an estimate of the abundance of scats available to observers monitoring for fox presence.

Methods: In total, 486 fresh fox scats were placed at nine sites within three bioregions in Tasmania and left to degrade for up to 126 days. Scats were observed periodically by both humans and dogs to determine when they became unrecognisable and/or undetectable.

Key results: Recognition of scats by humans declined faster in summer than in winter and did not vary systematically among bioregions. Median survival times of scats were 19 days in summer and 26 days in winter. Recognition of scats by dogs was higher in summer than in winter, with dogs recognising scats past the time they became unrecognisable to humans. Using estimates of scat degradation derived from human observers, the equilibrium abundance of detectable scats within a fox home range was estimated to be 179–243 scats. However, the abundance of detectable scats on linear features subject to monitoring was estimated to be 10–15 scats.

Conclusions: Using our estimate of the abundance of scats on linear features, the current distribution of fox scats detected in Tasmania may not be as anomalous as has been suggested by others. However, fox detection from scats will be highly dependent on deposition patterns and distribution of scats on linear features and this should be critically reassessed in Tasmania.

Implications: Fox scats are not expected to exhibit systematic regional differences in degradation rates that might have an impact on monitoring strategies. Estimates of the abundance of scats detectable by observers are critical for assessing the effectiveness of scat-monitoring programs. We advocate that a rigorous assessment of future scat-monitoring programs in Tasmania be undertaken to determine their power to detect foxes.

Additional keywords: European red fox, faeces, survival analysis.


References

Anon. (2014). ‘Fox Eradication Program.’ (Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment: Hobart.) Available at http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/invasive-species/current-programs/fox-eradication-program. [Verified 16 July 2014]

Berry, O., Sarre, S. D., Farrington, L., and Aitken, N. (2007). Faecal DNA detection of invasive species: the case of feral foxes in Tasmania. Wildlife Research 34, 1–7.
Faecal DNA detection of invasive species: the case of feral foxes in Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brooks, S., and Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7, 434–455.

Burbidge, A. A., and Manly, B. F. J. (2002). Mammal extinctions on Australian islands: causes and conservation implications. Journal of Biogeography 29, 465–473.
Mammal extinctions on Australian islands: causes and conservation implications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caley, P., and Barry, S. C. (2014). Quantifying extinction probabilities from sighting records: inference and uncertainties. PLoSONE 9, e95857.
Quantifying extinction probabilities from sighting records: inference and uncertainties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cavallini, P. (1994). Faeces count as an index of fox abundance. Acta Theriologica 39, 417–424.
Faeces count as an index of fox abundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Congdon, P. D. (2010). ‘Applied Bayesian Hierarchical Methods.’ (Chapman and Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL.)

Daley, E. A. (2007). ‘Wings: an Introduction to Tasmania’s Winged Insects.’ (Riffles Pty Ltd: Buckland, Tas.) Available at http://eprints.utas.edu.au/5965/. [Verified 15 June 2014]

Davison, A., Birks, J. D. S., Brookes, R. C., Braithwaite, T. C., and Messenger, J. E. (2002). On the origin of faeces: morphological versus molecular methods for surveying rare carnivores from their scats. Journal of Zoology 257, 141–143.
On the origin of faeces: morphological versus molecular methods for surveying rare carnivores from their scats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gelman, A., Meng, X. L., and Stern, H. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica 6, 733–807.

Gonçalves, J., Marks, C. A., Obendorf, D., Amorim, A., and Pereira, F. (2014). The risks of using ‘species-specific’ PCR assays in wildlife research: the case of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) identification in Tasmania. Forensic Science International. Genetics 11, e9–e11.
The risks of using ‘species-specific’ PCR assays in wildlife research: the case of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) identification in Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24742708PubMed |

Lunn, D., Jackson, C., Best, N., Thomas, A., and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2013). ‘The BUGS Book: a Practical Introduction to Bayesian Analysis.’ (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

Marks, C. A., Obendorf, D., Pereira, F., Edwards, I., and Hall, G. P. (2014). The dispersion and detection patterns of mtDNA assigned red fox Vulpes vulpes scats in Tasmania are anomalous. Journal of Applied Ecology 51, 1033–1040.
The dispersion and detection patterns of mtDNA assigned red fox Vulpes vulpes scats in Tasmania are anomalous.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhtF2lt77K&md5=4dceb7da0745967303734d88c86c4632CAS | 25641979PubMed |

Parkes, J. P., and Anderson, D. (2009). Review of the program to eradicate foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from Tasmania. Landcare Research contract report, LC0809/176, Lincoln, New Zealand.

Piggott, M. P. (2004). Effect of sample age and season of collection on the reliability of microsatellite genotyping of faecal DNA. Wildlife Research 31, 485–493.
Effect of sample age and season of collection on the reliability of microsatellite genotyping of faecal DNA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVKrurnJ&md5=6808559b8e29b345043aaccd772810e9CAS |

Sarre, S. D., MacDonald, A. J., Barclay, C., Saunders, G. R., and Ramsey, D. S. L. (2013). Foxes are now widespread in Tasmania: DNA detection defines the distribution of this rare but invasive carnivore. Journal of Applied Ecology 50, 459–468.
Foxes are now widespread in Tasmania: DNA detection defines the distribution of this rare but invasive carnivore.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Saunders, G., Lane, C., Harris, S., and Dickman, C. R. (2006). Foxes in Tasmania: a report on an incursion of an invasive species. Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra.

Saunders, G. R., Gentle, M. N., and Dickman, C. R. (2010). The impacts and management of foxes Vulpes vulpes in Australia. Mammal Review 40, 181–211.
The impacts and management of foxes Vulpes vulpes in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Short, J., and Smith, A. (1994). Mammal decline and recovery in Australia. Journal of Mammalogy 75, 288–297.
Mammal decline and recovery in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Short, J., Bradshaw, S. D., Giles, J., Prince, R. I. T., and Wilson, G. R. (1992). Reintroduction of macropods (Marsupialia: Macropodoidea) in Australia: a review. Biological Conservation 62, 189–204.
Reintroduction of macropods (Marsupialia: Macropodoidea) in Australia: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., and Van Der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Statistical Methodology 64, 583–639.
Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thackway, R., and Cresswell, I. (1997). A biogeographic framework for planning the national system of protected areas in Australia. Natural Areas Journal 17, 241–247.

Webbon, C. C., Baker, P. J., and Harris, S. (2004). Faecal density counts for monitoring changes in red fox numbers in rural Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 768–779.
Faecal density counts for monitoring changes in red fox numbers in rural Britain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |