Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An assessment of ‘turtle-friendly’ lights on the sea-finding behaviour of loggerhead turtle hatchlings (Caretta caretta)

Katharine Robertson A , David T. Booth A C and Colin J. Limpus B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Biological Science, The University of Queensland, Qld 4072, Australia.

B Threatened Species Unit, Queensland Government Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: d.booth@uq.edu.au

Wildlife Research 43(1) 27-37 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR15138
Submitted: 10 July 2015  Accepted: 10 January 2016   Published: 23 March 2016

Abstract

Context: It is well established that artificial light can disrupt the sea-finding ability of sea turtle hatchlings, and some manufactures are now marketing ‘turtle-friendly’ lights that are supposed to be minimally disruptive to this sea-finding behaviour. However, there have been no studies that have tested whether ‘turtle-friendly’ lights are benign to hatchling sea turtle sea-finding ability.

Aims: We tested two different types of ‘turtle-friendly’ lights (LED amber-light peak intensity 620 nm and LED red-light peak intensity 640 nm) to see whether they are disruptive to the sea-finding ability of eastern-coast Australian loggerhead turtle hatchlings.

Methods: Using standard circular-arena experiments, we assessed the directional preference of newly emerged loggerhead turtle hatchlings from the Woongarra Coast of Queensland, Australia, during different moon phases without artificial lighting and in the presence of ‘turtle-friendly’ lights.

Key results: Contrary to expectations, sea-finding ability of hatchlings was disrupted by the amber lights, particularly in the absence of a moon. The less intense red lights were less disruptive to hatchlings; however, misorientation and disorientation events still occurred when lights were within 4 m of hatchlings. The disruptive impact on sea-finding ability increased with the cumulative impact of multiple lights increasing light intensity.

Conclusions: The ‘turtle-friendly’ lights we used disrupted the sea-finding ability of eastern-coast Australian loggerhead turtle hatchlings, with the most pronounced disruption occurring under moonless conditions.

Implications: The use of amber and red LED lights adjacent to the nesting beaches of loggerhead sea turtles should be managed because this lighting has the potential to disrupt the sea-finding ability of sea turtle hatchlings.

Additional keywords: disorientation, light pollution, misorientation, sea-turtle hatchling.


References

Adamany, S. L., Salmon, M., and Witherington, B. E. (1997). Behavior of sea turtles at an urban beach. III. Costs and benefits of nest caging as a management strategy. Florida Scientist 60, 239–253.

Batschelet, E. (1981). ‘Circular Statistics in Biology.’ (Academic Press: London.)

Berry, M., Booth, D. T., and Limpus, C. J. (2013). Artificial lighting and disrupted sea-finding behaviour in hatchling loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on the Woongarra coast, south-east Queensland, Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 61, 137–145.
Artificial lighting and disrupted sea-finding behaviour in hatchling loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on the Woongarra coast, south-east Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bertolotti, L., and Salmon, M. (2005). Do embedded roadway lights protect sea turtles? Environmental Management 36, 702–710.
Do embedded roadway lights protect sea turtles?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16206020PubMed |

Bourgeois, S., Gilot-Fromont, E., Viallefont, A., Boussamba, F., and Deem, S. L. (2009). Influence of artificial lights, logs and erosion on leatherback sea turtle hatchling orientation at Pongara National Park, Gabon. Biological Conservation 142, 85–93.
Influence of artificial lights, logs and erosion on leatherback sea turtle hatchling orientation at Pongara National Park, Gabon.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bustard, H. R. (1967). Mechanism of nocturnal emergence from the nest in green turtle hatchlings. Nature 214, 317.
Mechanism of nocturnal emergence from the nest in green turtle hatchlings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fritsches, K. A. (2012). Australian loggerhead sea turtle hatchlings do not avoid yellow. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 45, 79–89.
Australian loggerhead sea turtle hatchlings do not avoid yellow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harewood, A., and Horrocks, J. (2008). Impacts of coastal development on hawksbill hatchling survival and swimming success during the initial offshore migration. Biological Conservation 141, 394–401.
Impacts of coastal development on hawksbill hatchling survival and swimming success during the initial offshore migration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Horch, K. W., Gocke, J. P., Salmon, M., and Forward, R. B. (2008). Visual spectral sensitivity of hatchling loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea) sea turtles, as determined by single-flash electroretinography. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 41, 107–119.
Visual spectral sensitivity of hatchling loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea) sea turtles, as determined by single-flash electroretinography.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kamrowski, R. L., Limpus, C., Moloney, J., and Hamann, M. (2012). Coastal light pollution and marine turtles: assessing the magnitude of the problem. Endangered Species Research 19, 85–98.
Coastal light pollution and marine turtles: assessing the magnitude of the problem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kamrowski, R. L., Limpus, C., Jones, R., Anderson, S., and Hamann, M. (2014a). Temporal changes in artificial light exposure of marine turtle nesting areas. Global Change Biology 20, 2437–2449.
Temporal changes in artificial light exposure of marine turtle nesting areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24353164PubMed |

Kamrowski, R. L., Limpus, C., Pendoley, K., and Hamann, M. (2014b). Influence of industrial light pollution on the sea-finding behaviour of flatback turtle hatchlings. Wildlife Research 41, 421–434.
Influence of industrial light pollution on the sea-finding behaviour of flatback turtle hatchlings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXjsVWktLw%3D&md5=cebb68603371c4ceb4b7bae202c8efd6CAS |

Karnad, D., Isvaran, K., Kar, C. S., and Shanker, K. (2009). Lighting the way: towards reducing misorientation of olive ridley hatchlings due to artificial lighting at Rushikulya, India. Biological Conservation 142, 2083–2088.
Lighting the way: towards reducing misorientation of olive ridley hatchlings due to artificial lighting at Rushikulya, India.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kyba, C. C. M., Ruhtz, T., Fischer, J., and Holker, F. (2011). Cloud coverage acts as an amplifier for ecological light pollution in urban ecosystems. PLoS One 6, e17307.
Cloud coverage acts as an amplifier for ecological light pollution in urban ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXjtl2lsbo%3D&md5=18c99a1bd589fc7b1c5a8bffd7bbae07CAS |

Limpus, C. J. (1971). Sea turtle ocean finding behaviour. Search 2, 385–387.

Limpus, C. J. (2008). Status of the eastern Australian loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta, population, November 2008. Unpublished report to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.

Limpus, C. J. (2009). ‘A Biological Review of Australian Marine Turtles.’ (Environmental Protection Agency: Brisbane.)

Limpus, C. J., and Kamrowski, R. L. (2013). Ocean-finding in marine turtles: the importance of low horizon elevation as an orientation cue. Behaviour 150, 863–893.

Limpus, C. J., and Limpus, D. J. (2003). Loggerhead turtles in the equatorial and southern Pacific Ocean: a species in decline. In ‘Loggerhead Sea Turtles’. (Eds A. B.Bolten and B. E. Witherington.) pp. 199–209. (Smithsonian Books: Washington, DC.)

Lohmann, K. J., Witherington, B. E., Lohmann, C. M. F., and Salmon, M. (1997). Orientation, navigation, and natal beach homing in sea turtles. In ‘The Biology of Sea Turtles’. (Eds P. Lutz and J. Musick.) pp. 107–136. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

Lorne, J. K., and Salmon, M. (2007). Effects of exposure to artificial lighting on orientation of hatchling sea turtles on the beach and in the ocean. Endangered Species Research 3, 23–30.
Effects of exposure to artificial lighting on orientation of hatchling sea turtles on the beach and in the ocean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mann, T. M. (1978). Impact of developed coastline on nesting and hatchling sea turtles in southeastern Florida. Florida Marine Research Publications 33, 53–55.

McFarlane, R. W. (1963). Disorientation of loggerhead hatchlings by artificial road lighting. Copeia 1963, 153.
Disorientation of loggerhead hatchlings by artificial road lighting.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mrosovsky, N. (1968). Nocturnal emergence of hatchling sea turtles: control by thermal inhibition of activity. Nature 220, 1338–1339.
Nocturnal emergence of hatchling sea turtles: control by thermal inhibition of activity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF1M%2FnvVCjtA%3D%3D&md5=45e7419b3e61f5d1c89f3380e8306b92CAS | 5701356PubMed |

Mrosovsky, N., and Carr, A. (1967). Preference for light of short wavelengths in hatchling green sea turtles, Chelonia mydas, tested on their natural nesting beaches. Behaviour 28, 217–231.
Preference for light of short wavelengths in hatchling green sea turtles, Chelonia mydas, tested on their natural nesting beaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF2s3itFaquw%3D%3D&md5=aec1e6deb3a40f9aad10159b9c1d4733CAS | 6038298PubMed |

Mrosovsky, N., and Shettleworth, S. J. (1968). Wavelength preferences and brightness cues in the water finding behaviour of sea turtles. Behaviour 32, 211–257.
Wavelength preferences and brightness cues in the water finding behaviour of sea turtles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF1M7ltVejtA%3D%3D&md5=4f0a6a0d75a831873ab3bf3d340c2696CAS | 5717260PubMed |

Mrosovsky, N., and Shettleworth, S. J. (1975). Orientation circle of leatherback turtle, Dermochelys coriacea. Animal Behaviour 23, 568–591.
Orientation circle of leatherback turtle, Dermochelys coriacea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pendoley, K., and Kamrowski, R. L. (2015). Influence of horizon elevation on the sea-finding behaviour of hatchling flatback turtles exposed to artificial light glow. Marine Progress Series 529, 279–288.
Influence of horizon elevation on the sea-finding behaviour of hatchling flatback turtles exposed to artificial light glow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pilcher, N. J., and Simon, E. (2001). Effects of prolonged retention in hatcheries on green turtle (Chelonia mydas) hatchling swimming speed and survival. Journal of Herpetology 35, 633–638.
Effects of prolonged retention in hatcheries on green turtle (Chelonia mydas) hatchling swimming speed and survival.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Salmon, M., and Witherington, B. E. (1995). Artificial lighting and seafinding by loggerhead hatchlings: evidence for lunar modulation. Copeia 1995, 931–938.
Artificial lighting and seafinding by loggerhead hatchlings: evidence for lunar modulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Salmon, M., Wyneken, J., Fritz, E., and Lucas, M. (1992). Seafinding by hatchling sea turtles: role of brightness, silhouette and beach slope as orientation cues. Behaviour 122, 56–77.
Seafinding by hatchling sea turtles: role of brightness, silhouette and beach slope as orientation cues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tuxbury, S. M., and Salmon, M. (2005). Competitive interactions between artificial lighting and natural cues during seafinding by hatchling marine turtles. Biological Conservation 121, 311–316.
Competitive interactions between artificial lighting and natural cues during seafinding by hatchling marine turtles.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Witherington, B. E. (1991). Orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles at sea off artificially lighted and dark beaches. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 149, 1–11.
Orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles at sea off artificially lighted and dark beaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Witherington, B. E., and Bjorndal, K. A. (1991a). Influences of artificial lighting on the sea ward orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta. Biological Conservation 55, 139–149.
Influences of artificial lighting on the sea ward orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Witherington, B. E., and Bjorndal, K. A. (1991b). Influences of wavelength and intensity on hatchling sea turtle phototaxis: implications for sea-finding behavior. Copeia 1991, 1060–1069.
Influences of wavelength and intensity on hatchling sea turtle phototaxis: implications for sea-finding behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Witherington, B. E., and Martin, R. E. (2003). Understanding, assessing, and resolving light-pollution problems on sea turtle nesting beaches. 3rd edn revised. Florida Marine Research Institute Technical Reports TR-2, St. Petersburg, FL.

Witherington, B. E., Bjorndal, K. A., and McCabe, C. M. (1990). Temporal pattern of nocturnal emergence of loggerhead turtle hatchlings from natural nests. Copeia 1990, 1165–1168.
Temporal pattern of nocturnal emergence of loggerhead turtle hatchlings from natural nests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zar, J. H. (2010). ‘Biostatistical Analysis.’ 5th edn. (Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.)