Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Where do Norway rats live? Movement patterns and habitat selection in livestock farms in Argentina

Daniela P. Montes de Oca A , Rosario Lovera A and Regino Cavia A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires (IEGEBA), UBA-CONICET, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

B Corresponding author. Email: rcavia@ege.fcen.uba.ar

Wildlife Research 44(4) 324-333 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16219
Submitted: 1 December 2016  Accepted: 26 May 2017   Published: 25 July 2017

Abstract

Context: The Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) is recognised as one of the most harmful invasive mammal species in natural, urban and rural environments worldwide. Prevention and control of pest species in livestock farms is necessary to protect animal and human health, but control practices usually do not take into account the biology and ecology of the species to be controlled. The understanding of the biological requirements of Norway rats is necessary for the implementation of efficient management actions.

Aims: The aim of this research was to study movement patterns and habitat selection of Norway rats on livestock farms in central Argentina. We hypothesised that rats select specific areas within the farms according to the farm’s structure and to the availability of resources.

Methods: We conducted live-trapping of rats in a pig farm and a dairy farm, during each of four seasons over 1 year. Traps were active for three consecutive days at each trapping session. Movements and habitat selection were assessed by spool-and-line technique combined with environmental surveys and GIS tools.

Key results: We captured a total of 133 Norway rats and evaluated the movements of 47 individuals. The mean length travelled, registered for one night, was 84.28 ± 38.21 m. They did not travel great linear distances within the farms, but instead performed tortuous trajectories around specific sites. Norway rats selected sites containing food, water and refuges; and avoided travelling across areas with short vegetation. Sites containing food sources were most preferred.

Conclusions: Because food sources for rats were present ad libitum in farms, our findings strongly support the idea that management strategies of prevention and control of this species must include adequate rodent-proof food storage. Also, because rats are found close to livestock, improvement in preventing rats’ access to animal sheds is necessary to prevent contamination of livestock feeders with pathogens carried by rats.

Implications: The present study provides novel information about the ecology of Norway rats on livestock farms. We encourage farmers to follow our recommendations in order to improve rodent-control strategies.

Additional keywords: habitat preference, locomotion, pest ecology, pest management, spatial ecology.


References

Abas, M. (2015). La composición dietaria de la zarigüeya overa Didelphis albiventris y la zarigüeya colorada Lutreolina crassicaudata y su relación con sistemas de producción animal en áreas rurales del centro de la región Pampeana. B.Sc. Thesis, University of Buenos Aires: Buenos Aires.

Abrahams, M. V., and Dill, L. M. (1989). A determination of the energetic equivalence of the risk of predation. Ecology 70, 999–1007.
A determination of the energetic equivalence of the risk of predation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Aebischer, N. J., Robertson, P. A., and Kenward, R. E. (1993). Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74, 1313–1325.
Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Akande, O. A. (2011). A study on wild rat behaviour and control on a pig farm. Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

Anderson, T. J., Berry, A. J., Amos, J. N., and Cook, J. M. (1988). Spool-and-line tracking of the New Guinea spiny bandicoot, Echymipera kalubu (Marsupialia, Peramelidae). Journal of Mammalogy 69, 114–120.
Spool-and-line tracking of the New Guinea spiny bandicoot, Echymipera kalubu (Marsupialia, Peramelidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barnett, S. A., and Spencer, M. M. (1951). Feeding, social behaviour and interspecific competition in wild rats. Behaviour 3, 229–242.

Berg, H. C. (1993) ‘Random Walks in Biology.’ (Princeton University Press: New Jersey.)

Berry, A. J., Anderson, T. J., Amos, J. N., and Cook, J. M. (1987). Spool-and-line tracking of giant rats in New Guinea. Journal of Zoology 213, 299–303.
Spool-and-line tracking of giant rats in New Guinea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Block, W. M., and Brennan, L. A. (1993). The habitat concept in ornithology. In ‘Current Ornithology’. (Ed. D. M. Power.) pp. 35–91. (Plenum Press: New York.)

Boonstra, R., and Craine, I. (1986). Natal nest location and small mammal tracking with a spool and line technique. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, 1034–1036.
Natal nest location and small mammal tracking with a spool and line technique.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown, J. S. (1988). Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22, 37–47.
Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Calenge, C. (2006). The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling 197, 516–519.
The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Calhoun, J. B. (1963) ‘Ecology and sociology of the Norway rat.’ (Department of health, Education and Welfare: USA.)

Cavia, R., Cueto, G. R., and Suárez, O. V. (2012). Techniques to estimate abundance and monitor rodent pests in urban environments. In ‘Integrated Pest Management and Pest Control – Current and Future Tactics’. (Eds M. L. Larramendy and S. Soloneski.) pp. 147–172. (InTech: Rijeka, Croatia.)

Clapperton, B. K. (2006) ‘A Review of the Current Knowledge of Rodent Behaviour in Relation to Control Devices’. (Science & Technical Publishing, Department of Conservation: Wellington.)

Coto, H. (Ed.) (1997). ‘Biología y control de ratas sinantrópicas.’ (Editorial Abierta: Buenos Aires.)

Cowan, P. E. (1977). Neophobia and neophilia: new-object and new-place reactions of three Rattus species. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 91, 63–71.
Neophobia and neophilia: new-object and new-place reactions of three Rattus species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cowan, D. P., Quy, R. J., and Lambert, M. S. (2003). Ecological perspectives on the management of commensal rodents. In ‘ACIAR Monograph Series 96’. pp. 433–439. (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra)

Crawley, M. J. (2007) ‘The R book.’ (Imperial College London: Silwood Park, UK.)

Davis, D. E., Emlen, J. T., and Stokes, A. W. (1948). Studies on home range in the brown rat. Journal of Mammalogy 29, 207–225.
Studies on home range in the brown rat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dowding, J. E., Murphy, E. C., and Veitch, C. R. (1999). Brodifacoum residues in target- and non-target species following an aerial poisoning operation on Motuihe Island, Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 23, 207–214.

Drummond, D. C. (2001). Rodents and biodeterioration. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 48, 105–111.
Rodents and biodeterioration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

ESRI (1999). ‘ArcView GIS.’ (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.: New York.)

Feng, A. Y., and Himsworth, C. G. (2014). The secret life of the city rat: a review of the ecology of urban Norway and black rats (Rattus norvegicus and Rattus rattus). Urban Ecosystems 17, 149–162.
The secret life of the city rat: a review of the ecology of urban Norway and black rats (Rattus norvegicus and Rattus rattus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gardner-Santana, L. C., Norris, D. E., Fornadel, C. M., Hinson, E. R., Klein, S. L., and Glass, G. E. (2009). Commensal ecology, urban landscapes, and their influence on the genetic characteristics of city-dwelling Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). Molecular Ecology 18, 2766–2778.
Commensal ecology, urban landscapes, and their influence on the genetic characteristics of city-dwelling Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXpvFeiu74%3D&md5=b243b74f6c22af332106ca3b6f2c49d9CAS |

Glass, G. E. (1997). Hantaviruses. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 10, 362.
Hantaviruses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gómez Villafañe, I. E., and Busch, M. (2007). Spatial and temporal patterns of brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) abundance variation in poultry farms. Mammalian Biology 72, 364–371.

Gómez Villafañe, I. E., Bilenca, D., Cavia, R., Miño, M. H., Cittadino, E. A., and Busch, M. (2001). Environmental factors associated with rodent infestations in Argentine poultry farms. British Poultry Science 42, 300–307.
Environmental factors associated with rodent infestations in Argentine poultry farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gómez Villafañe, I. E., Bilenca, D. N., Cavia, R., and Busch, M. (2003). Intra-farm variation of rodent infestations on poultry farms of central Argentina. British Poultry Science 44, 669–673.
Intra-farm variation of rodent infestations on poultry farms of central Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gómez Villafañe, I. E., Muschetto, E., and Busch, M. (2008). Movements of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) in two poultry farms, Exaltación de la Cruz, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 15, 203–208.

Gómez Villafañe, I. E., Cavia, R., Vadell, M. V., Suárez, O. V., and Busch, M. (2013). Differences in population parameters of Rattus norvegicus in urban and rural habitats of central Argentina. Mammalia 77, 187–193.

Guidobono, J. S., León, V., Gómez Villafañe, I. E., and Busch, M. (2010). Bromadiolone susceptibility in wild and laboratory Mus musculus L. (house mice) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Pest Management Science 66, 162–167.
| 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXjvVSlsw%3D%3D&md5=6347e0cce0fd071236ab597d8ae2ce08CAS |

Gurnell, J. (1980). The effects of prebaiting live traps on catching woodland rodents. Acta Theriologica 25, 255–264.
The effects of prebaiting live traps on catching woodland rodents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hanski, I., Barrett, G. W., and Peles, J. D. (2013) ‘Landscape Ecology of Small Mammals.’ (Springer Science & Business Media: New York.)

Hardy, A. R. and Taylor, K. D. (1979). Radio tracking of Rattus norvegicus on farms. In ‘A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking’. (Eds C. J. Amlaner and D. W. Macdonald.) pp. 657–665 (Elsevier: Oxford.)

Hooge, P. N., and Eichenlaub, B. (2000). Animal movement extension to Arcview. V.2.0. United States Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center. Biological Science Office, Anchorage, AK.

IGM (1998). ‘Atlas geográfico de la República Argentina.’ (Instituto Geográfico Militar: Buenos Aires.)

Jackson, T. P., and Van Aarde, R. J. (2003). Advances in vertebrate pest control: implications for the control of feral house mice on Marion Island. South African Journal of Science 99, 130–136.

Jacob, J. (2008). Response of small rodents to manipulations of vegetation height in agro-ecosystems. Integrative Zoology 3, 3–10.
Response of small rodents to manipulations of vegetation height in agro-ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keen, W. H. (1982). Habitat selection and interspecific competition in two species of plethodontid salamanders. Ecology 63, 94–102.
Habitat selection and interspecific competition in two species of plethodontid salamanders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kelt, D. A., and Van Vuren, D. H. (2001). The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area. American Naturalist 157, 637–645.
The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1critlyitg%3D%3D&md5=20455e3843ad3fe963ed0a246c21df5fCAS |

Klemann, N., and Pelz, H. J. (2006). The feeding pattern of the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) in two differently structured habitats on a farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97, 293–302.
The feeding pattern of the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) in two differently structured habitats on a farm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kosoy, M., Khlyap, L., Cosson, J.-F., and Morand, S. (2015). Aboriginal and invasive rats of genus Rattus as hosts of infectious agents. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) 15, 3–12.
Aboriginal and invasive rats of genus Rattus as hosts of infectious agents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lambert, M. S., Quy, R. J., Smith, R. H., and Cowan, D. P. (2008). The effect of habitat management on home-range size and survival of rural Norway rat populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1753–1761.
The effect of habitat management on home-range size and survival of rural Norway rat populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Leveau, L. M., Teta, P., Bogdaschewsky, R., and Pardiñas, U. F. (2006). Feeding habits of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) along a longitudinal–latitudinal gradient in central Argentina. Ornitologia Neotropical 17, 353–362.

Lima, S. L. (2002). Putting predators back into behavioral predator–prey interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 70–75.
Putting predators back into behavioral predator–prey interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lore, R. K. and Schultz, L. A. (1989). The ecology of wild rats: Applications in the laboratory. In ‘Ethoexperimental Approaches to the Study of Behaviour’. (Eds R. J. Blanchard, P. F. Brain, D. C. Blanchar and S. Parmigiani.) pp. 607–622. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York.)

Lovera, R., Fernández, M. S., and Cavia, R. (2015). Wild small mammals in intensive milk cattle and swine production systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 202, 251–259.
Wild small mammals in intensive milk cattle and swine production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Macdonald, D., and Fenn, M. (1995). Rat ranges in arable areas. Journal of Zoology 236, 349–353.
Rat ranges in arable areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Macdonald, D. W., Mathews, F., and Berdoy, M. (1999). The behaviour and ecology of Rattus norvegicus: from opportunism to kamikaze tendencies. In ‘Ecologically-based Rodent Management’. (Eds G. R. Singleton, H. Leirs, L. A. Hinds and Z. Zhang.) pp. 49–80. (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra.)

Manly, B., McDonald, L., and Thomas, D. (1993). ‘Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies.’ (Springer: Netherlands.)

Marsh, R., E. (1994). Roof rats. In ‘The Handbook: Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage’. (Eds S. E. Hygnstrom, R. M. Timm and G. E. Larson.) Paper 6, pp. 125–132. (University of Nebraska: Lincoln.)

Massa, C., Teta, P., and Cueto, G. R. (2014). Effects of regional context and landscape composition on diversity and composition of small rodent assemblages in Argentinian temperate grasslands and wetlands. Mammalia 78, 371–382.
Effects of regional context and landscape composition on diversity and composition of small rodent assemblages in Argentinian temperate grasslands and wetlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. (1999) ‘Generalized Linear Models.’ (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.)

McMillan, B. R., and Kaufman, D. W. (1995). Travel path characteristics for free-living white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 73, 1474–1478.
Travel path characteristics for free-living white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miles, M. A., Souza, A., and Povoa, M. (1981). Mammal tracking and nest location in Brazilian forest with an improved spool-and-line device. Journal of Zoology 195, 331–347.
Mammal tracking and nest location in Brazilian forest with an improved spool-and-line device.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mills, J. N., Ellis, B. A., Mckee, K. T., Maiztegui, J. I., and Childs, J. E. (1991). Habitat associations and relative densities of rodent populations in cultivated areas of central Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 72, 470–479.
Habitat associations and relative densities of rodent populations in cultivated areas of central Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mohr, C. O. (1947). Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. American Midland Naturalist 37, 223–249.
Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moors, P. J. (1985). Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) on the Noises and Motukawao Islands, Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 8, 37–54.

Nathan, R., Getz, W. M., Revilla, E., Holyoak, M., Kadmon, R., Saltz, D., and Smouse, P. E. (2008). A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 19052–19059.
A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFamurfP&md5=e85cc333b1b175c1de671432afc38fbeCAS |

Nelson, L., and Clark, F. W. (1973). Correction for sprung traps in catch/effort calculations of trapping results. Journal of Mammalogy 54, 295–298.
Correction for sprung traps in catch/effort calculations of trapping results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Noble, J., Todd, P. M., and Tucif, E. (2001). Explaining social learning of food preferences without aversions: an evolutionary simulation model of Norway rats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 268, 141–149.
Explaining social learning of food preferences without aversions: an evolutionary simulation model of Norway rats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzmsleqsg%3D%3D&md5=d39df2636938f4f877da21a41bda17e9CAS |

Pinheiro, J., and Bates, D., DebRoy, S., and Sarkar, D. (2011). The R Development Core Team 2011 nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–102. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.

R Core Team (2013). ‘R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna.)

Ryser, J. (1995). Activity, movement and home range of Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) in Florida. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History 38, 177–194.

Shanahan, D. F., Mathieu, R., and Seddon, P. J. (2007). Fine-scale movement of the European hedgehog: an application of spool-and-thread tracking. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 31, 160.

Sikes, R. S., and Gannon, W. L. (2011). Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 92, 235–253.
Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Singleton, G. R., and Brown, P. R. (1999). Management of mouse plagues in Australia: integration of population ecology, bio-control and best farm practice. In ‘Advances in Vertebrate Pest Management’. (Eds D. P. Cowan and C. J. Feare.) pp. 189–203. (Filander Verlag: Fürth, Germany.)

Singleton, G. R., Leirs, H., Hinds, L. A., and Zhang, Z. (1999). Ecologically-based management of rodent pests – re-evaluating our approach to an old problem. In ‘Ecologically-based Rodent Management’. (Eds G. R. Singleton, H. Leirs, L. A. Hinds and Z. Zhang.) pp. 17–29. (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra.)

Singleton, G. R., Brown, P. R., Jacob, J., Aplin, K. P, and Sudarmaji, (2007). Unwanted and unintended effects of culling: a case for ecologically-based rodent management. Integrative Zoology 2, 247–259.
Unwanted and unintended effects of culling: a case for ecologically-based rodent management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Soriano, A., León, R. J. C., Sala, O. E., Lavado, R. S., Deregibus, V. A., Cauhepe, M. A., Scaglia, O. A., Velázquez, C. A., and Lemcoff, J. H. (1992). Río de la Plata grassland. In ‘Ecosystems of the World 8A. Natural grasslands. Introduction and Western Hemisphere’. (Ed. R. Coupland.) pp. 367–407. (Elsevier: Amsterdam.)

Stapp, P. (1997). Community structure of shortgrass-prairie rodents: competition or risk of intraguild predation? Ecology 78, 1519–1530.

Taylor, K. D., and Quy, R. J. (1978). Long distances movements of a common rat (Rattus norvegicus) revealed by radio-tracking. Mammalia 42, 63–71.
Long distances movements of a common rat (Rattus norvegicus) revealed by radio-tracking.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Timm, R. M. (1994). Norway rats. In ‘Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage’. (Eds S. E. Hygnstrom, R. M. Timm and E. L. Gary.) pp. 105–120. (University of Nebraska: Lincoln.)

Traweger, D., and Slotta-Bachmayr, L. (2005). Introducing GIS-modelling into the management of a brown rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.) (Mamm. Rodentia Muridae) population in an urban habitat. Journal of Pest Science 78, 17–24.
Introducing GIS-modelling into the management of a brown rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.) (Mamm. Rodentia Muridae) population in an urban habitat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Traweger, D., Travnitzky, R., Moser, C., Walzer, C., and Bernatzky, G. (2006). Habitat preferences and distribution of the brown rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.) in the city of Salzburg (Austria): implications for an urban rat management. Journal of Pest Science 79, 113–125.
Habitat preferences and distribution of the brown rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.) in the city of Salzburg (Austria): implications for an urban rat management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vadell, M. V., Cavia, R., and Suárez, O. V. (2010). Abundance, age structure and reproductive patterns of Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus in two areas of the city of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Pest Management 56, 327–336.
Abundance, age structure and reproductive patterns of Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus in two areas of the city of Buenos Aires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vadell, M. V., Gómez Villafañe, I. E., and Cavia, R. (2014). Are life-history strategies of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) and house mice (Mus musculus) dependent on environmental characteristics? Wildlife Research 41, 172–184.
Are life-history strategies of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) and house mice (Mus musculus) dependent on environmental characteristics?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Webster, J. P., Ellis, W. A., and Macdonald, D. W. (1995). Prevalence of Leptospira spp. in wild brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) on UK farms. Epidemiology and Infection 114, 195.
Prevalence of Leptospira spp. in wild brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) on UK farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7nt1Wluw%3D%3D&md5=982e0eebfa38ce6ff7a1487d3785b41bCAS |

Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., Smith, G. M. (2009). ‘Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York.)