Register      Login
Australian Journal of Zoology Australian Journal of Zoology Society
Evolutionary, molecular and comparative zoology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Quantifying annual patterns in the frequency of mammalian births: do goodness-of-fit tests provide adequate inferences?

Evan Watkins A B and Julian Di Stefano B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science, University of Melbourne, 4 Water Street, Creswick, Vic. 3363, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: juliands@unimelb.edu.au

Australian Journal of Zoology 60(6) 381-387 https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO12056
Submitted: 28 May 2012  Accepted: 4 April 2013   Published: 3 May 2013

Abstract

Hypotheses relating to the annual frequency distribution of mammalian births are commonly tested using a goodness-of-fit procedure. Several interacting factors influence the statistical power of these tests, but no power studies have been conducted using scenarios derived from biological hypotheses. Corresponding to theories relating reproductive output to seasonal resource fluctuation, we simulated data reflecting a winter reduction in birth frequency to test the effect of four factors (sample size, maximum effect size, the temporal pattern of response and the number of categories used for analysis) on the power of three goodness-of-fit procedures – the G and Chi-square tests and Watson’s U2 test. Analyses resulting in high power all had a large maximum effect size (60%) and were associated with a sample size of 200 on most occasions. The G-test was the most powerful when data were analysed using two temporal categories (winter and other) while Watson’s U2 test achieved the highest power when 12 monthly categories were used. Overall, the power of most modelled scenarios was low. Consequently, we recommend using power analysis as a research planning tool, and have provided a spreadsheet enabling a priori power calculations for the three tests considered.


References

Ampadu, C., Wang, D., and Steele, M. (2009). Simulated power of some discrete goodness-of-fit test statistics for testing the null hypothesis of a ‘zig-zag’ distribution. Far East Journal of Theoretical Statistics 28, 157–171.

Baker, J. R. (1938). The evolution of breeding seasons. In ‘Evolution: Essays on Aspects of Evolutionary Biology’. (Ed. G. R. de Beer.) pp. 161–177. (Clarendon Press: Oxford.)

Bausell, R. B., and Li, Y. (2002). ‘Power Analysis for Experimental Research: a Practical Guide for the Biological, Medical, and Social Sciences.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Best, D. J., and Rayner, J. C. W. (1981). Are two classes enough for the χ2 goodness of fit test? Statistica Neerlandica 35, 157–163.
Are two classes enough for the χ2 goodness of fit test?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caughley, G. (1967). Parameters for seasonally breeding populations. Ecology 48, 834–839.
Parameters for seasonally breeding populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Choulakian, V., Lockhart, R. A., and Stephens, M. A. (1994). Camér–von Mises statistics for discrete distributions. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 22, 125–137.
Camér–von Mises statistics for discrete distributions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clutton-Brock, T. H., Maccoll, A., Chadwick, P., Gaynor, D., Kansky, R., and Skinner, J. D. (1999). Reproduction and survival of suricates (Suricata suricatta) in the southern Kalahari. African Journal of Ecology 37, 69–80.
Reproduction and survival of suricates (Suricata suricatta) in the southern Kalahari.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dahiya, R. C., and Gurland, J. (1973). How many classes in the Pearson Chi-square test? Journal of the American Statistical Association 68, 707–712.

Freedman, L. S. (1981). Watson’s U 2 N statistic for a discrete distribution. Biometrika 68, 708–711.

Hood, G. M. (2011). PopTools v. 3.2.5. Available at: http://www.poptools.org.

Koehler, K. J., and Gan, F. F. (1990). Chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests: cell selection and power. Communications in Statistics Simulation and Computation 19, 1265–1278.
Chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests: cell selection and power.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McConnell, S. J., and Tyndale-Biscoe, C. H. (1985). Response in peripheral plasma melatonin to photoperiod change and the effects of exogenous melatonin on seasonal quiescence in the tammar, Macropus eugenii. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 73, 529–538.
Response in peripheral plasma melatonin to photoperiod change and the effects of exogenous melatonin on seasonal quiescence in the tammar, Macropus eugenii.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL2MXktVWjtb4%3D&md5=8f020a292e161def56e3193b244ea88fCAS | 4039367PubMed |

Moe, T. F., Kindberg, J., Jansson, I., and Swenson, J. E. (2007). Importance of diel behaviour when studying habitat selection: examples from female Scandinavian brown bears (Ursus arctos). Canadian Journal of Zoology 85, 518–525.
Importance of diel behaviour when studying habitat selection: examples from female Scandinavian brown bears (Ursus arctos).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nelson, R. J., and Desjardins, C. (1987). Water availability affects reproduction in deer mice. Biology of Reproduction 37, 257–260.
Water availability affects reproduction in deer mice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2FltFSktg%3D%3D&md5=10c991ceadadd21f51fcc6e17d04a55cCAS | 3676383PubMed |

Nelson, R. J., Gubernick, D. J., and Blom, J. M. C. (1995). Influence of photoperiod, green food, and water availability on reproduction in male California mice (Peromyscus californicus). Physiology & Behavior 57, 1175–1180.
Influence of photoperiod, green food, and water availability on reproduction in male California mice (Peromyscus californicus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXlslOqt70%3D&md5=c5e031d6fadb6d0b203aaf0e0f75667bCAS |

Paplinska, J. Z., Moyle, R. L. C., Temple-Smith, P. D. M., and Renfree, M. B. (2006). Reproduction in female swamp wallabies, Wallabia bicolor. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18, 735–743.
Reproduction in female swamp wallabies, Wallabia bicolor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pettitt, A. N., and Stephens, M. A. (1977). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit statistic with discrete and grouped data. Technometrics 19, 205–210.
The Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit statistic with discrete and grouped data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Quinn, G. P., and Keough, M. J. (2002). ‘Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Reiter, R. J. (1974). Circannual reproductive rhythms in mammals related to photoperiod and pineal function: a review. Chronobiologia 1, 365–395.
| 1:STN:280:DyaE28%2FmsFKjtg%3D%3D&md5=282a8904eabc2ebe607225625205c684CAS | 4619797PubMed |

Robertshaw, J. D., and Harden, R. H. (1986). The ecology of the dingo in north-eastern New South Wales IV. Prey selection by dingoes, and its effect on the major prey species, the swamp wallaby, Wallabia bicolor (Desmarest). Australian Wildlife Research 13, 141–163.
The ecology of the dingo in north-eastern New South Wales IV. Prey selection by dingoes, and its effect on the major prey species, the swamp wallaby, Wallabia bicolor (Desmarest).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shelmidine, N., Borries, C., and McCann, C. (2009). Patterns of reproduction in Malayan silvered leaf monkeys at the Bronx zoo. American Journal of Primatology 71, 852–859.
Patterns of reproduction in Malayan silvered leaf monkeys at the Bronx zoo.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19472173PubMed |

Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1995). ‘Biometry.’ 3rd edn. (W.H. Freeman and Co.: New York.)

Steele, M., and Chaseling, J. (2006). Powers of discrete goodness-of-fit test statistics for a uniform null against a selection of alternative distributions. Communications in Statistics Simulation and Computation 35, 1067–1075.
Powers of discrete goodness-of-fit test statistics for a uniform null against a selection of alternative distributions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Steele, M., Smart, N., Hurst, C., and Chaseling, J. (2009). Evaluating the statistical power of goodness-of-fit tests for health and medicine survey data. In ‘18th World Imacs Congress and Modsim09 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Interfacing Modelling and Simulation with Mathematical and Computational Sciences’. (Eds R. S. Anderssen, R. D. Braddock and L. T. H. Newham.) pp. 192–196. (Cairns: Australia.)

Underwood, A. J. (1997). ‘Experiments in Ecology. Their Logical Design and Interpretation using Analysis of Variance.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Vandenbergh, J. G., and Vessey, S. (1968). Seasonal breeding of free-ranging rhesus monkeys and related ecological factors. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 15, 71–79.
Seasonal breeding of free-ranging rhesus monkeys and related ecological factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaF1c7mtVyisQ%3D%3D&md5=5947ba261269baa84865fc56e5df5ee6CAS | 4966619PubMed |

Watson, G. S. (1961). Goodness-of-fit tests on a circle. Biometrika 48, 109–114.

Zar, J. H. (1999). ‘Biostatistical Analysis.’ 4th edn. (Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ).

Zhang, S. Y., Liang, B., and Wang, L. X. (2000). Seasonality of matings and births in captive Sichuan golden monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana). American Journal of Primatology 51, 265–269.
Seasonality of matings and births in captive Sichuan golden monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Flt1SntQ%3D%3D&md5=6b943360f23c05c20c6a11d22b6875e0CAS |