
%0 Journal Article
%A Johnston, W. H. 
%A Garden, D. L. 
%A Ran&#x010D;i&#x0107;, A. 
%A Koen, T. B. 
%A Dassanayake, K. B. 
%A Langford, C. M. 
%A Ellis, N. J. S. 
%A Rab, M. A. 
%A Tuteja, N. K. 
%A Mitchell, M. 
%A Wadsworth, J. 
%A Dight, D. 
%A Holbrook, K. 
%A LeLievre, R. 
%A McGeoch, S. M. 
%T The impact of pasture development and grazing on water-yielding catchments in the Murray&#8211;Darling Basin in south-eastern Australia
%J Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
%D 2003/09/16
%V 43
%N 8
%P 817-841
%K 
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/EA02236
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/EA02236 
%X Experiments conducted from November 1996 to June 2002 in adjacent small catchments near Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, compared the productivity and hydrology of a heavily fertilised (about 30 kg phosphorus/ha.year) Phalaris aquatica (phalaris) pasture with that of a lightly fertilised (about 14 kg phosphorus/ha every second year) native grassland that contained a mixture of C3 and C4 perennial grasses, dominantly C4 Bothriochloa macra (redgrass).In summer, the native catchment was dominated by C4 perennial grasses while the phalaris catchment was dominated by annual C4 weedy species. During the cooler months, the phalaris pasture contained higher proportions of Vulpia spp., and other less-desirable annual grasses. Throughout the experiment, the native catchment was dominated by redgrass, whereas in the phalaris catchment the persistence of phalaris declined. Redgrass became prominent on the more arid aspects of the phalaris catchment as the experiment progressed.Pasture production in the phalaris catchment was higher in most seasons than the native catchment, which resulted in an overall stocking rate advantage of about 80%. The productivity gain per unit of P input was 0.4 for the phalaris catchment compared with 1 for the native catchment, implying that phosphorus was applied to the phalaris catchment at an excessive rate.During wet periods the native catchment produced substantially more runoff than the phalaris catchment, while in dry times it developed substantially larger soil water deficits. Runoff from the phalaris catchment was higher in suspended and dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus than for the native catchment. Higher runoff from the native catchment combined with its drier soil profile in summer indicated that its deep drainage potential was less than in the phalaris catchment. 
