
%0 Journal Article
%A Haile-Mariam, M. 
%A Bowman, P. J. 
%A Goddard, M. E. 
%T Genetic parameters of fertility traits and their correlation with production, type, workability, liveweight, survival index, and cell count
%J Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
%D 2004/01/21
%V 55
%N 1
%P 77-87
%K heritability, progeny transmitting ability.
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/AR03059
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/AR03059 
%X First and second parity data on calving interval (CI, days), survival to next lactation (Surv, scored 1 or 0), calving to first service interval (CFS, days), 25-day first service non-return rate (FNRR, scored 1 or 0), and insemination or submission rate (InsemR, scored 1 or 0) of Holstein-Friesian cattle were analysed using a sire model to estimate genetic parameters. The estimated genetic parameters were used to obtain predicted transmitting ability (PTA) of sires for fertility traits and Surv, including 6-week pregnancy rate (6-w PR). PTA for 6-w PR was calculated based on an estimated heritability of 0.07 and genetic and environmental correlations with the other fertility traits and Surv. In addition, approximate genetic correlations of fertility traits and Surv with milk yield, type traits, workability (likability, milking speed, temperament), survival index (a measure of survival calculated from estimated breeding values on survival, likability, and type traits), bodyweight, and cell count were estimated. Heritability (h2) of fertility traits was 2&#8211;4% in the first parity and 1&#8211;2% in the second parity. Genetic correlations between fertility traits were generally higher in magnitude than environmental correlations, particularly in the first parity. The difference in PTA between the best and worst sires was high (21 days in CI and 21% in 6-w PR), showing the scope for selection. Approximate genetic correlations between fertility and most traits that are currently evaluated were low to moderate. Milk, protein and fat yield, body size, overall type, mammary system, udder texture, muzzle width, angularity, body depth, chest width, foot angle, and rear attachment width were unfavourably correlated (0.1&#8211;0.5) with most fertility traits. Fat and protein % were favourably correlated with both CI and 6-w PR (~0.2). Pin set was moderately favourably correlated (0.28) with 6-w PR. Surv was favourably (positively) correlated with temperament, likability, and survival index (~0.5). The wide variation in particular in CI and 6-w PR between bulls and the generally unfavourable approximate genetic correlations of fertility traits with most traits for which selection is currently practiced suggest that genetic evaluation for fertility should be introduced. 
