
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Pook, EW 
T1  - Canopy Dynamics of Eucalyptus Maculata Hook. I. Distribution and Dynamics of Leaf Populations
JF  - Australian Journal of Botany
JO  - Aust. J. Bot.
Y1  - 1984
VL  - 32
IS  - 4
SP  - 387
EP  - 403
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9840387 
N2  - The canopy dynamics of a regenerated 16-year-old stand of pole and sapling E. maculata were studied for 2&#189; years by repetitive non-destructive measurements in tree crowns accessed from a 20 m high scaffold tower. Average canopy leaf area density over a sample plot of 36 m2 was 0.23 m2 m-3 at a leaf area index of 4.3. Some 75% of leaf area was held in the canopies of overstorey eucalypts above 10 m in height. Average size of leaves increased gradually from top to bottom of tree canopies. Foliage production was usually concentrated in the upper crowns of trees where there was a higher proportion of active shoots, more frequent growth flushes and more rapid turnover of leaves than in lower canopy layers. Leaf area in the upper canopy fluctuated widely but increased in the long term, in mid canopy was more or less maintained and in lowest canopy declined. Crops of developing flower buds present on uppermost branches delayed and/or reduced shoot growth. Foliage production occurred in all months of the year. There was a unimodal annual rhythm of growth rate reaching a maximum in summer and a minimum in winter. Variable water supply, however, influenced production to peak in spring, summer or autumn. No shoot growth occurs in E. maculata at Kioloa when daily mean temperature (averaged for weekly intervals) falls below c. 10&#189;C in winter. An upper temperature limit for growth could not be defined. The species apparently lacks dormancy mechanisms. Shoot growth is 'opportunistic' and occurs whenever environmental conditions are favourable. Patterns of leaf production and leaf fall were variable but peaks showed a general synchrony. Leaf fall, however, tended to lag behind leaf production. Leaves of all ages were shed but main losses were from older cohorts. Some 49% (s.d.&#177;18%) of new leaves were lost while still small or immature, mainly during periods of vigorous shoot growth or low water supply. Browse of immature foliage was light. Normal senescence and leaf fall accounted for almost the entire loss of mature foliage. 
ER  -

