
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Dalal, R. C. 
A1  - Strong, W. M. 
A1  - Weston, E. J. 
A1  - Cooper, J. E. 
A1  - Wildermuth, G. B. 
A1  - Lehane, K. J. 
A1  - King, A. J. 
A1  - Holmes, C. J. 
T1  - Sustaining productivity of a Vertisol at Warra, Queensland, with fertilisers, no-tillage, or legumes. 5. Wheat yields, nitrogen benefits and water-use efficiency of chickpea-wheat rotation
JF  - Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
JO  - Aust. J. Exp. Agric.
Y1  - 1998
VL  - 38
IS  - 5
SP  - 489
EP  - 501
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/EA98027 
N2  - Summary. In this study, the benefits of chickpea&#8211;wheat rotation compared with continuous wheat cropping (wheat&#8211;wheat rotation) were evaluated for their effects on soil nitrate nitrogen, wheat grain yields and grain protein concentrations, and water-use efficiency at Warra, southern Queensland from 1988 to 1996. Benefits in terms of wheat grain yields varied, from 17% in 1993 to 61% in 1990, with a mean increase in grain yield of 40% (825 kg/ha). Wheat grain protein concentration increased from 9.4% in a wheat&#8211;wheat rotation to 10.7% in a chickpea&#8211;wheat rotation, almost a 14% increase in grain protein. There was a mean increase in soil nitrate nitrogen of 35 kg N/ha.1.2 m after 6 months of fallow following chickpea (85 kg N/ha) compared with continuous wheat cropping (50 kg N/ha). This was reflected in additional nitrogen in the wheat grain (20 kg N/ha) and above-ground plant biomass (25 kg N/ha) following chickpea. Water-use efficiency by wheat increased from a mean value of 9.2 kg grain/ha. mm in a wheat&#8211;wheat rotation to 11.7 kg grain/ha.mm in a chickpea&#8211;wheat rotation. The water-use efficiency values were closely correlated with presowing nitrate nitrogen, and showed no marked distinction between the 2 cropping sequences. Although presowing available water in soil in May was similar in both the chickpea&#8211;wheat rotation and the wheat&#8211;wheat rotation in all years except 1996, wheat in the former used about 20 mm additional water and enhanced water-use efficiency. Thus, by improving soil fertility through restorative practices such as incorporating chickpea in rotation, water-use efficiency can be enhanced and consequently water runoff losses reduced. Furthermore, beneficial effects of chickpea in rotation with cereals could be enhanced by early to mid sowing (May&#8211;mid June) of chickpea, accompanied by zero tillage practice. Wheat of &#8216;Prime Hard&#8217; grade protein (&#x2265;13%) could be obtained in chickpea&#8211;wheat rotation by supplementary application of fertiliser N to wheat. In this study, incidence of crown rot of wheat caused by Fusarium graminearum was negligible, and incidence and severity of common root rot of wheat caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana were essentially similar in both cropping sequences and inversely related to the available water in soil at sowing. No other soil-borne disease was observed. Therefore, beneficial effects of chickpea on wheat yields and grain protein were primarily due to additional nitrate nitrogen following the legume crop and consequently better water-use efficiency. 
ER  -

