
TY  - JOUR
A1  - McGuirk, BJ 
A1  - Rose, M 
A1  - Scott, R 
T1  - Productivity of classers&apos; grades and sire selection differentials for fleece weight in two Merino studs
JF  - Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
JO  - Aust. J. Exp. Agric.
Y1  - 1982
VL  - 22
IS  - 117
SP  - 274
EP  - 280
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9820274 
N2  - The normal practice in Merino studs is to class the rams visually into three grades: reserve rams from which the stud sires will be chosen; flock rams for use in commercial flocks; and culls. This study examined the productivity of these grades in three drops of rams from each of two studs. In each drop there were differences between the grades in greasy and clean fleece weight. In stud 1 the relative clean and greasy wool percentages in the reserve, flock and cull grades were 11 6,98 and 86, and 11 6,98 and 87 (P < 0.05), respectively. Clean fleece weights were not available on the visual culls in stud 2. In that stud the relative greasy wool percentages of rams in three grades were 112, 98 and 90, and the reserve rams also cut 15% more clean wool than the flock rams (P< 0.05). The differences between the grades in yield and average fibre diameter were less than they were for fleece weight and generally not statistically significant. In stud 1 the reserve rams were 0.6% higher yielding and 0.2 pm stronger than the drop average. The reserve rams were less variable than the other grades in fleece weights, yield and diameter. The largest differences were for fleece weights, where the differences in variation between the grades were significant. The average coefficient of variation for greasy fleece weight among the reserve rams in the two studs was 10.0% compared with the estimate of 13.2% for the whole drop. Selection differentials for fleece weight were estimated for stud sires selected from these six drops of rams. The efficiency of sire selection for either greasy or clean fleece weight was in excess of 70% of the maximum possible. In the four drops in which all sire replacements were selected exclusively from the reserves, the two steps in the sire selection procedure contribution almost equally to the sire selection differentials achieved. 
ER  -

