
%0 Journal Article
%A Bunt, R.J.W. 
%A Powell, W.D. 
%A Scholefield, T. 
%T THE TUBRIDGI GAS FIELD REJUVENATED
%J The APPEA Journal
%D 2001/06/30
%V 41
%N 1
%P 429-447
%K 
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ00020
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/AJ00020 
%X Difficulties in defining the structural character of the reservoir horizons at the Tubridgi Gas Field arise from gas charging of thin, often laterally discontinuous, silts and sands within the overburden. The gas charging of these shallow, low permeability units results in a seismic representation of the field as a time low. Historically, conversion from time to a reliable depth image has been problematic due to the variable nature of the gas charging, the relatively sparse, multi-vintage 2D seismic coverage and the corresponding difficulties in defining an accurate velocity field.After the unsuccessful drilling program in 1997 when three out of the five wells were plugged and abandoned, a revised interpretation methodology was developed, incorporating all available geophysical data, but placing a much greater emphasis on geological information from each of the wells in the area.The new depth map and geological model were tested by the drilling of Tubridgi&#x2013;16 to &#x2013;18 in August 1999. These three wells intersected the Birdrong Sandstone within one metre of prognosis, with two wells located structurally up-dip of the previous 17 wells drilled on the field. This accuracy resulted in a 97% increase in remaining reserves and a much higher level of confidence in the structural configuration of the Tubridgi field.A core of the Lower Gearle Sandstone in the Tubridgi 18 well highlighted the potential of this zone which has subsequently been evaluated in greater detail and potentially represents an additional productive horizon for the field. 
