
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Pallikathekathil, Z.J. 
A1  - Marsden, J.R. 
A1  - Suttill, R.J. 
A1  - Mussared, M. 
A1  - Qiuguo, L. 
T1  - A QUICK-LOOK EVALUATION OF THE SANDING POTENTIAL OF PRODUCTION WELLS IN THE YOLLA FIELD
JF  - The APPEA Journal
JO  - The APPEA Journal
Y1  - 2005
VL  - 45
IS  - 1
SP  - 77
EP  - 96
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ04007 
N2  - The preliminary downhole completions and surface facilities for the Yolla field had been designed based on the well test results from the Yolla&#x2013;1 well. This well had produced insignificant sand during production testing, but during the field development planning, there was a concern raised regarding the propensity of some zones to sand. If the zones were prone to sanding, then the design of completions and surface facilities would have to be re-worked on with steps taken to mitigate any sanding. Mitigation steps would include perforation strategy (selective zone perforation, oriented perforation), sand screen or gravel pack.Therefore, a quick-look evaluation of the sanding potential of the particular zones of interest was undertaken to be completed within the project time frame. The sand zones analysed were Sand&#x2013;2718, &#x2013;2755, &#x2013;2809, and &#x2013;2973 from the Eastern View Coal Measures(EVCM).Yolla&#x2013;2 well had the most complete data set available. A mechanical earth model (MEM) containing information on rock properties, pressures and in-situ stresses was constructed based on open-hole log data from the Yolla&#x2013;2 appraisal well. Laboratory tests provided some uni-axial compressive strength (UCS) data for calibration of the model. The MEM data were input into sanding analyses, for various reservoir depths and for selected completion and perforation options. Since some MEM parameters were poorly constrained, best- and worst-case scenarios and sensitivities were evaluated to assess the influence of geomechanical parameters on sanding propensity.When Yolla&#x2013;3 and &#x2013;4 were drilled, more complete sets of logs were acquired and used to improve confidence in the earlier evaluations, and to check the validity of certain assumptions that had been made. With revised evaluation for Yolla&#x2013;3 and &#x2013;4, decisions on the completion strategy and perforation intervals were taken and implemented in the field development planAfter completion, both Yolla&#x2013;3 and Yolla&#x2013;4 were tested and sanding rates were monitored. After initial transient production of sand during clean-up, sand rates produced were insignificant. This confirmed the results of the quicklook geomechanical analyses that had been conducted. 
ER  -

