
%0 Journal Article
%A Stagg, H. M. J. 
%T THE GEOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF THE SCOTT PLATEAU
%J The APPEA Journal
%D 1978/06/30
%V 18
%N 1
%P 34-43
%K 
%R https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ77004
%U https://www.publish.csiro.au/paper/AJ77004 
%X The Scott Plateau and the adjacent Rowley Terrace cover about 130,000 km2 beyond Australia&apos;s Northwest Shelf in water depths ranging from 300 m to 3000 m. The regional geology and structural evolution of the area have been interpreted from about 13,000 km of seismic reflection profiles.The Scott Plateau forms a subsided oceanward margin to the Browse Basin. For much of the period from the Carboniferous to the Middle Jurassic, preceding the breakup which formed this part of the continental margin, the Scott Plateau was probably above sea level shedding sediment into the developing Browse Basin. After breakup in the Bathonian to Callovian, the plateau subsided, until by the Late Cretaceous open marine conditions were prevalent over most of the area, with the probable exception of some structurally high areas which may have remained emergent until early in the Tertiary. Carbonate sedimentation commenced in the Santonian and has continued to the present, with major hiatuses in the Paleocene and Oligocene. Analysis of magnetic and seismic data indicates that, over much of the plateau, economic basement of possible Kimberley Block equivalents is probably no more than 3 to 4 km below sea bed. To the south of the Scott Plateau, the Rowley Terrace is underlain by a wedge of at least 6 km of Mesozoic and Tertiary sediments of the northeast- trending Rowley Sub - basin. The Rowley Sub -basin connects with the Beagle Sub-basin to the southwest and probably connects with the Browse Basin to the northeast. It has been largely unaffected by episodes of faulting, except in the southwest where faulting and folding are pronounced. The petroleum potential of the Scott Plateau is not rated highly. The potential hydrocarbon-bearing sediments here are probably no younger than Palaeozoic. These are quite likely to be only 2 to 4 km thick, and any hydrocarbons generated within them would probably have been lost during the protracted period of emergence and erosion that preceded breakup. The hydrocarbon potential appears to be greater in the Rowley Sub-basin, where Triassic to Cretaceous shale and siltstone source rocks, and Triassic to Lower Cretaceous sandstone reservoir rocks are expected to be present. However, the potential of these sequences is downgraded because hydrocarbon shows in exploration wells on the adjacent part of the Northwest Shelf have been only minor, and by the apparent scarcity of suitable traps. Exploitation of any hydrocarbons would be costly owing to the great water depths. 
