
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Wulff, Keiran 
T1  - DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY AND FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE UPPER JURASSIC SEDIMENTS IN THE EASTERN BARROW SUB-BASIN
JF  - The APPEA Journal
JO  - The APPEA Journal
Y1  - 1992
VL  - 32
IS  - 1
SP  - 104
EP  - 122
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ91010 
N2  - Callovian to Tithonian syn-rift sediments in the eastern Barrow Sub-basin can be subdivided into five depositional sequences, each separated by regionally correlatable unconformities. Sequence boundary development can be closely related to periods of major changes in basin configuration associated with the sequential breakup of eastern Gondwanaland. Synchronism of major faulting with sequence boundary development during the early and late Callovian, mid Kimmeridgian, and mid Tithonian times supports tectonism being a dominant control on the development of Type 1 unconformities in the eastern Barrow Sub-basin.Upper Jurassic depositional sequences in the eastern Barrow Sub-basin, whether of tectonic or eustatic origin, consist primarily of lowstand systems tracts comprised, wholly or in part, of detached basin floor fan complexes, channelised and canyon-fed fan systems, slump deposits, outer shelf to slope deposits, and deep marine claystones. Inner shelf to shoreface sediments of the transgressive and highstand systems tracts are absent due to episodic, post-depositional uplift and erosion along the Peedamullah Shelf and Flinders Fault System during the Late Jurassic. The periods of uplift and erosion provided much of the sediment redeposited in basinal areas during lowstand times.Depositional models based on regional sequence stratigraphic studies can be integrated with local seismic stratigraphy to provide a mechanism for estimating likely reservoir quality, once controls on sedimentation (namely tectonics, eustasy, and sediment supply) are understood. This is demonstrated by the recognition of at least seven sandstone facies within the Upper Jurassic sedimentary section. Each sandstone has particular characteristics which can be related to the depositional setting. Reservoir quality is best developed in dominantly medium grained, moderate to well sorted sandstones, deposited as detached, basin floor submarine fan sands or interbedded turbidites. In contrast, reservoir quality is poorly developed in the remaining sand-prone facies deposited as slope fans, slumps, or distal turbidites. 
ER  -

