
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Marsland, S. 
A1  - Bi, D. 
A1  - Uotila, P. 
A1  - Fiedler, R. 
A1  - Griffies, S. 
A1  - Lorbacher, K. 
A1  - O'Farrell, S. 
A1  - Sullivan, A. 
A1  - Uhe, P. 
A1  - Zhou, X. 
A1  - Hirst, A. 
T1  - Evaluation of ACCESS climate model ocean diagnostics in CMIP5 simulations
JF  - Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Journal
JO  - Aust. Meteor. and Ocean. J.
Y1  - 2013
VL  - 63
IS  - 1
SP  - 101
EP  - 119
KW  - 
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1071/ES13007 
N2  - Global and regional diagnostics are used to evaluate the ocean performance of the Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator coupled model (ACCESS-CM) contributions to the Climate Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5). Two versions of ACCESS-CM have been submitted to CMIP; namely CSIRO-BOM ACCESS1.0 and CSIRO-BOM ACCESS1.3. Results from six of the core CMIP5 experiments (piControl, historical, rcp45, rcp85, 1pctCO2, and abrupt4xCO2) are evaluated for each of the two ACCESS-CM model versions. Overall, both model versions exhibit a reasonable and stable representation of key diagnostics of ocean climate performance in the pre-industrial control simulations, including a meridional overturning circulation with North Atlantic Deep Water maxima in the range 22&#x2013;24 Sv, and a poleward heat transport maximum of around 1.5 PW. For the projected climate change scenarios considered the ACCESS-CM results are in reasonable agreement with responses found in other CMIP models, with the familiar ocean warming, and reduction in strength of meridional overturning and poleward heat transport. Drifts in the control simulations of both global ocean salinity and global sea-level are opposite in sign for ACCESS1.0 and ACCESS1.3, suggesting problems exist in the closure of the hydrological cycle. The simulation of ocean climate change over the historical period shows a weak response compared to observations, which manifests as a late response of ocean warming and sea level rise starting around 1990 in the model, compared to the mid 1960s in observations. Further historical simulations are underway to ascertain if this late response in ACCESS is a robust model feature, or just low frequency variability. If the weak response over the historical period proves robust, the likely cause is a too strong cooling from atmospheric aerosols. Broadening the set of experiments to further investigate the relative warming response of the ACCESS-CM to greenhouse gases compared to the cooling response to aerosols is underway, and preliminary results do suggest that the cooling due to aerosols is strong in the historical simulations. 
ER  -

